Anyways, I think it is pointless to keep arguing this. We obviously have different viewpoints on the MP and on how we should react if in this situation. I think you are a good person, but that we don't need to debate this endlessly Smile.
Fair enough. I don't expect you to keep arguing. I do though have some extra points I want to add that you can take on board as food for thought, or it might be of interest to someone else to read.
I think the main difference between your argument and my argument is the focus on 'I' or 'us'. * Please see extracted quotes:
So what if I'm starving by the Nazis. So I go fight for the Soviets who have just burned down my Church, how could I justify that?
Let's say I do go actually fight for the Soviets, when I come back I am going to go back into the Catacombs and follow the Catacombnik bishops since I believe the MP is in heresy and then they will make me suffer just like the Nazis did, possibly even worse than the Nazis made me suffer.
A. I am not real likely to want to defend a government who just burned down the Church and killed my priest a few days ago, regardless of the suffering I am experiencing.
B. What would be the point, I go fight to keep myself from being killed by Nazis only to come back after the war to be killed by Soviets (or at least have my life turned into a living hell by them, and even if I am not alive, my family would suffer that for being Catacombniks).
Your focus seems to be your own suffering. The intent of my argument is other's suffering.