Jean-Serge wrote:Canonically speaking, a bishop who got his seat thanks to the political power should be deposed. So are they real bishops? I doubt it and I do not know.
To say that a hierarch should be deposed is quite a different matter from saying that he, along with the entire flock of people under him, is thrust out of the Church if he is not, is quite another. The deposition of bishops who violate the canons, but are not heretical, is an administrative matter, not a matter of the faith, and certainly not a matter of the continued communion of those churchmen who are under such hierarchs.
Worse even, they di not repent but found justifications to their collaboration with the communist regime saying, we saved the church through collaborating etc... I have never seen such a fake repentance. The problem is not that they collaborated. The case happened during persecution by the Romans. But people were asked after that to repent sincerely and had an epitimy...
I fully agree. The actions of the hierarchs of the MP at this time was reprehensible, but in all this, they did not teach heresy. The common Russian laity under the MP not only never consented to heresy, but gave many confessors and martyrs to join the ranks of the saints of ages past. I'll side with these martyrs rather than armchair western theologians who judge them excluded from the church because their hierarchs betrayed them.