Ekaterina wrote:ON THE RESTORATION OF EUCHARISTIC UNITY IN THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH
[...]
Secondly, if the Moscow Patriarchate has no grace, then surely ROCOR has no grace. After the catastrophe of World War II, ROCOR was re-formed with bishops and clergy who escaped from the Soviet Union, mostly from the Ukraine and Belarus. They had all been ordained or consecrated by bishops of the MP, to which they themselves had belonged. Having escaped the Soviet nightmare and joined ROCOR, they went on to consecrate other ROCOR bishops who have consecrated our present bishops, who in turn have ordained clergy. Therefore, if our post-War bishops from the Soviet Union had no grace, then do we? [...]
Priest Andrew Phillips29 September/12 October 2005,
New Hieromartyr John, Archbishop of Riga.
This argument is ridiculous, the MP before the revolution is not the same as the MP after the Sergianist betrayal. The ROCOR comes from the MP before Revolution. But with the Sergianist betrayal, the bishops of the MP entered in the category of those who fall during persecution. The crime is not having fallen but their unrepentance.
When we confess our sins, we are not to look for excuse as they are doing : "yes we saved the church". This shows they are unrepentant...