Nektarios,
Weren't you the one who was defending the Antiochians (whom I expect you are still affiliated with?) a few months ago for the exact same thing? Which is worse, a priest communing non-chalcedonians (the OCA situation you mention), or an entire jurisdiction publically and via written statements officially saying it's ok to do so (Antiochians)? I don't mean to slam the Antiochians here, I'm simply trying to figure out what your thinking is, since it comes across as inconsistent. If I remember correctly, back in the day you were saying that what one priest or bishop does, does not invalidate the entire jurisdiction? I also seem to remember that even then, you had major problems with the OCA (it struck me as odd that you defended the Antiochians with such gusto, but didn't bat an eyelash at criticizing the OCA)? You remind me of me, over the past few years. 