Jerusalem Patriarchate - Oros of 1775

PFC Nektarios · Post by **PFC Nektarios** » Mon 26 January 2004 11:54 pm

Thank you OOD, I printed your post out, because its too long to read on here, thank you for your reply I look forward to reading it completley.

In Christ
OL

Daniel · Post by **Daniel** » Tue 27 January 2004 8:22 am

bogoliubtsy wrote:
Why does a statement made by the EP a couple hundred years ago carry weight, but not the ones today? Perhaps there were those back in the time of this "oros" who were against it, just as there are those today who are against the EP's current statements.

There were people in Constantinople that were opposed to the oros, they were mostly the westeren educated and latin minded though.

Aaron · Post by **Aaron** » Tue 27 January 2004 7:26 pm

OOD,

Thanks so much for your very informative post. I had some questions about the Orthodox position on baptisms performed outside the Church and now they're all cleared up. I am going to save it to a file and save it for future reference.

In Christ,
Aaron

romiosini · Post by **romiosini** » Tue 27 January 2004 8:29 pm

Lord Have Mercy!

bogoliubtsy · Post by **bogoliubtsy** » Wed 28 January 2004 3:22 pm

Arystarcus,
Maybe for the sake of a balanced perspective you should consider saving the two links Anastasios posted.

Daniel · Post by **Daniel** » Wed 28 January 2004 4:10 pm

bogoliubtsy wrote:
Arystarcus,
Maybe for the sake of a balanced perspective you should consider saving the two links Anastasios posted.

What is unbalanced about OOD's post?

OrthodoxyOrDeath · Post by **OrthodoxyOrDeath** » Wed 28 January 2004 4:45 pm

Aaron,

You are quite welcome. If I had the time I would have wrote myself - the article I posted is intended for a certain audience and might seems harsh for people considering Orthodoxy.