Yes, I did hear that the "preventative pill" actually acts often as an abortifacient instead of a preventing fertilisation.
Ok, so if there is no official position on the matter (and I have got the feeling that according to some Orthodox out there that for them even that assertion is not actually true patristically) what do you think is likely to be the stronger of the two positions if one were to generalise and say, "more often than not," or, "On general principle it is more in keeping with Patristic and Orthodox ideals to..."
What would you say in that case? Because I think it is fair to say that Orthodoxy, while it may allow some discretion in these matters pastorally, does have ethical and spiritual ideals that would better reflect one over the other. And Roman Catholic advocates of NFP have, I think, made very solid and reasonable cases for NFP on such grounds as that NFP follows a more ascetical spirit than being able to do it anytime you want to without having pregnancy being a consideration or motivation to exercise self-control or responsibility. Pleasure without responsibility it seems to me is something not really in the plan of God in such cases. What do you think?
(You can tell, that I am leaning in favour towards the Roman Catholic arguments for NFP. I do find their arguments very compelling, I will admit. However, I would like to hear some other views I might not have considered, or to know if I am feeling something that is possibly correct, that NFP is the stronger of the two positions even if only in general sense -- without dogmatising about it.