Fr. Seraphim speaks on ecumenism and the correctness disease

Patristic theology, and traditional teachings of Orthodoxy from the Church fathers of apostolic times to the present. All forum Rules apply. No polemics. No heated discussions. No name-calling.


Post Reply
bogoliubtsy
Sr Member
Posts: 666
Joined: Wed 16 April 2003 4:53 pm
Location: Russia

Fr. Seraphim speaks on ecumenism and the correctness disease

Post by bogoliubtsy »

— What should be our response to this worldly “ecumenical” movement? Fortunately, our bishops of the Russian Church Outside of Russia have given us a sound policy to follow: we do not participate in the Ecumenical Movement, and our Metropolitan [Philaret] has warned other Orthodox Christians of the disastrous results of their ecumenical course if they continue; but at the same time our bishops have refused to cut off all contact and communion with Orthodox Churches involved in the Ecumenical Movement, recognizing that it is still a tendency that has not yet come to its conclusion (the Unia with Rome) and that (at least in the case of the Moscow Patriarchate and other churches behind the Iron Curtain) it is a political policy forced upon the Church by secular authorities. But because of this policy, our Church suffers attacks both from the left side (from ecumenists who accuse us of being “uncharitable,” “behind the times,”and the like) and from the right side (by groups in Greece that demand that we break communion with all Orthodox Churches and declare them to be without grace).

— Indeed, if one looks at the state of the Orthodox Church in Greece, we can see that the Ecumenical Movement has produced a reaction that has often become excessive, and sometimes is almost as bad as the disease it seeks to cure. The more moderate of the Old Calendarist groups in Greece has a position similar to that of our Russian Church Abroad; but schism after schism has occurred among the Old Calendarists over the question of “strictness.” A few years ago one of these groups cut off communion with our Russian Church Abroad because our bishops refused to declare that all other Orthodox Churches are without grace; this group now declares that it alone has grace, only it is Orthodox. Recently this group has attracted some converts from our Russian Church Abroad, and we should be aware that this attitude is a danger to some of our American and European converts: with our calculating, rationalistic minds it is very easy to think we are being zealous and strict, when actually we are chiefly indulging our passion for self-righteousness.

— One Old Calendarist bishop in Greece has written to us that incalculable harm has been done to the Orthodox Church in Greece by what he calls the “correctness disease,” when people quote canons, Fathers, the typicon in order to prove they are “correct” and everyone else is wrong. Correctness can truly become a “disease” when it is administered without love and tolerance and awareness of one’s own imperfect understanding. Such a “correctness” only produces continual schisms, and in the end only helps the Ecumenical Movement by reducing the witness of sound Orthodoxy.

— Conspicuous among Orthodox today—certain to be with us into the 1980’s—is the worldly spirit by which Orthodoxy is losing its savor, expressed in the Ecumenical Movement, together with the reaction against it, which is often excessive precisely because the same worldly spirit is present in it. …

User avatar
Seraphim Reeves
Member
Posts: 493
Joined: Sun 27 October 2002 2:10 pm
Location: Canada

Year?

Post by Seraphim Reeves »

— What should be our response to this worldly “ecumenical” movement? Fortunately, our bishops of the Russian Church Outside of Russia have given us a sound policy to follow: we do not participate in the Ecumenical Movement, and our Metropolitan [Philaret] has warned other Orthodox Christians of the disastrous results of their ecumenical course if they continue; but at the same time our bishops have refused to cut off all contact and communion with Orthodox Churches involved in the Ecumenical Movement, recognizing that it is still a tendency that has not yet come to its conclusion (the Unia with Rome) and that (at least in the case of the Moscow Patriarchate and other churches behind the Iron Curtain) it is a political policy forced upon the Church by secular authorities. But because of this policy, our Church suffers attacks both from the left side (from ecumenists who accuse us of being “uncharitable,” “behind the times,”and the like) and from the right side (by groups in Greece that demand that we break communion with all Orthodox Churches and declare them to be without grace).

What year was this article written in?

Seraphim

bogoliubtsy
Sr Member
Posts: 666
Joined: Wed 16 April 2003 4:53 pm
Location: Russia

Post by bogoliubtsy »

Not exactly sure, but it had to be before the 83' anathema as Fr.Seraphim reposed in 1982... if that's the info you're looking for..?

Daniel
Member
Posts: 443
Joined: Thu 10 July 2003 9:00 pm

Re: Year?

Post by Daniel »

seraphim reeves wrote:

and from the right side (by groups in Greece that demand that we break communion with all Orthodox Churches and declare them to be without grace).

What year was this article written in?

Seraphim

This puts it sometime after 1971.

OrthodoxyOrDeath

Post by OrthodoxyOrDeath »

I would like to point out the Letter Saint Philaret wrote to the priest.

http://www.euphrosynoscafe.com/forum/vi ... .php?t=948

This letter explained to a priest in the world the proper understanding of the ROCOR Synods understanding of no grace in the MP. Obviously this priest, as well as the entire Catacomb Church, was confused and unaware of the this proper understanding.

Could it be that Fr. Seraphim, who was a monk in the wilderness, was also a few shades off in his understanding? After all, Saint Philaret, who was the Metropolitan, should know his synod's position the best of all, should he not?

And I don't know why I even find myself trying to show that the ROCOR had the same ecclesiological understanding as the GOC when they consecrated our Bishops. The truth written by the Holy Fathers stands solidly and assuredly on its own - how well the ROCOR followed them or not is a much lesser question.

Post Reply