Patriarch Germanos V Concening the"Name-Worshippers"

Moderators: Mark Templet, Mark Templet

User avatar
Priest Siluan
Moderator
Posts: 1939
Joined: Wed 29 September 2004 7:53 pm
Faith: Russian Orthodox
Jurisdiction: RTOC
Location: Argentina
Contact:

Patriarch Germanos V Concening the"Name-Worshippers"

Post by Priest Siluan »

Official seal AdNs 1650 of Cons/pie, 1913.

Patriarchate. M of 9132 register

To the Very Holy Synod conducting the Church of Russia, our loved sister in the Holy Spirit, we give the fraternal kiss in Christ.

We have read and re-read with the greatest attention, together with our Holy Synod, the letter dated 28th of this month N° 7664, that Your Greatness has sent to us about the former monks of Mt Athos being now in Russia, who have fallen into the newly appeared heresy of the onomatotheists, and who persist in it with bad will and stubbornness, in spite of the many kinds of advice from the Church and the announcement that was done to them, that they will be definitely and forever expelled from Mount Athos and punished as per the sacred canons if they continue to perseverate in the heresy and in the disobedience and in the impiety to the Church, who has definitively condemned and disavowed their foolish doctrine as heretical and stained with blasphemy.

But Satan, who is the father of the lie and of the heresies, has to such an extent darkened their minds and denatured their hearts, that, far from returning to reason in spite of all kinds of advice that were given to them verbally or in writing, from distance as well as proximity by the Church, they go as far as listening to those who dare “insult” and “blaspheme” when the subject is about things that they do not know, rather than listening to the motherly voice of the Church, who called them with love and eagerness.

They were already enough punished for the sin that they committed against piety, Church and monachal discipline; one would wish that the loss that these men have suffered would not go farther and that the damage suffered would remain external, “so that the spirit would be saved on the day of our Lord Jesus Christ”.

But alas, as your Greatness has made it known to us, Satan, the killer of men deviated the reason and hardened the heart of those men, so that, even now, they refuse to come back to reason and to acknowledge and confess their mistake. That is how, in spite of being punished a first time already, they persist in the wrong way and continue to blaspheme against piety and Church. It is thus necessary to take new and rigorous measures against those recalcitrant men who refuse to repent. The judgement and the action of the Church towards them must go farther, and the penalties promulgated by the sacred canons against the hardened heretics must be applied rigorously, so that the heresy is definitely punished and the faithful are defended against the error and danger of being contaminated.

As those men are, at the present time, out of our Very Holy Ecumenical Throne, they are no longer under our ecclesial jurisdiction. From the political and ecclesial points of view, they are under the jurisdiction of our sister the Very Holy Church of Russia, as they came from Russia and returned there. Applying all of the measures promulgated in the circumstances by the holy canon is thus facilitated.

The ecclesial judgement to be taken and applied in the future towards those heretics, former monks of Mount Athos, is under the authority of our sister the Very Holy Church of Russia and will be, from all angles, more effective, if the matter would be pursued by her, as it is in her territory that the heresy of the onoimatotheist was born and still subsists.

Considering the above, and after deliberating and judging attentively with the Metropolitans, our dear brothers in the Holy Spirit, we have decided, during the session of the Holy Synod, to entrust to the direct care of the Ecclesial Authority of Russia, all that concerns the ulterior lot of the onomatotheist monks that settled in Russia, irrespectively of their ranks, so that, in her capacity of legal authority of which they depend, and with the whole power of our great Church of Christ, she decides and implements all that is necessary according to the sacred canons, in inviting the leaders of the heresy and those most prominent in it, to exonerate themselves, by applying to them the legal penalties and, as far as their numerous supporters are concerned, by ignorance or by other reason, by seeing to it that they return to the fold (of the Church).

The Russian Ecclesial Authority is wholly allowed to admit to the Holy Office and to the Holy Communion those who sincerely repented. It will be allowed to let the monks vest themselves as priests and celebrate liturgy, after a time of probation, but also, conversely, to exclude from priesthood the monks and priests who will persist stubbornly in the heresy and attempt to spread it within the people.

She will be allowed, as said above, with all the needed authority and in agreement with the clauses of the holy canons related to it, to take all decisions and to proceed to all legal acts towards its leaders and supporters without any exception. As it is not improbable that these men, after repenting, if they return to mount Athos, will cause worry and scandal there, we have decided that none of these men will return to Mount Athos, which we consider just and necessary.

Having taken the above decisions, which we judge useful and in conformity with the circumstances and the ecclesial order, these decisions being aimed at their punishment after judging the adepts of the heresy and at the defence of the orthodox, we hurry to communicate them to Your Greatness by this fraternal letter. We doubt in no way that, after this fraternal declaration, your Greatness will hurry to accept it and implement, as he will deem necessary, everything that will contribute to the prosecution and extirpation of the evil that threatens the orthodox people of the pious Russian Empire, and that will defend it against all contagion from the fallen former monks of Mount Athos.

Your Greatness will deign to hold us informed about everything that will be done on this matter.

Thereon,…

11 December 1913 Signed:

The Patriarch of Constantinople

Germanos
PFMA. 0. 797. On. 83. llomd. 3 cm. ft. 59. Jl. 193-195

Archimandrit Nilos
Member
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue 25 April 2006 8:34 am

Re: Patriarch Germanos V Concening the"Name-Worshippers"

Post by Archimandrit Nilos »

I think there are "Name-Worshippers" to-day, also among so called "True Orthodox Christians". This is very sad. Who belongs to them ?

User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

Re: Patriarch Germanos V Concening the"Name-Worshippers"

Post by Maria »

Archimandrit Nilos wrote:

I think there are "Name-Worshippers" to-day, also among so called "True Orthodox Christians". This is very sad. Who belongs to them ?

You might want to ask this question in the Private Forums as any responses would most likely be polemic in nature.

Back on topic:

What are the signs of "Name-Worshippers"?

We are to venerate the Holy Name of Jesus, but when does it cross over into worship of a name as God Himself?

Could the Jewish tradition of not enunciating or pronouncing the name of God be part of Name-Worshipping?

Could it be that the Protestantizing influence of Messianic Jews has also affected Orthodox Christians today?

I remember when the Jerusalem Bible was initially published in the early 1960s. The editorial committee used the term YAHWEH whenever the context allowed. Immediately, the Jews complained that they were guilty of blasphemy for the use of YAHWEH. Thus, in the newly revised Jerusalem Bible, this term YAHWEH is no where to be found. In addition, in order to satisfy the feminists, a gender neutral language was employed.

So, another question presents itself: Should Orthodox Christians also avoid the term "YAHWEH" and "I am Who am," and prefer the simple phrase: "the Lord God."

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

User avatar
GOCPriestMark
Moderator
Posts: 621
Joined: Mon 8 August 2005 10:13 pm
Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC-Metropolitan Kirykos
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Patriarch Germanos V Concening the"Name-Worshippers"

Post by GOCPriestMark »

Maria wrote:

So, another question presents itself: Should Orthodox Christians also avoid the term "YAHWEH" and "I am Who am," and prefer the simple phrase: "the Lord God."

As far as I know, every icon of our Lord Jesus Christ contains the words "I AM" in the halo (most usually in Greek). So, I would not think the Church shies away from proclaiming Jesus Christ as the I AM of the Old Testament. What language it is proclaimed in should not make any difference.

==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==

Priest Mark Smith
British Columbia

User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

Re: Patriarch Germanos V Concening the"Name-Worshippers"

Post by Maria »

GOCPriestMark wrote:
Maria wrote:

So, another question presents itself: Should Orthodox Christians also avoid the term "YAHWEH" and "I am Who am," and prefer the simple phrase: "the Lord God."

As far as I know, every icon of our Lord Jesus Christ contains the words "I AM" in the halo (most usually in Greek). So, I would not think the Church shies away from proclaiming Jesus Christ as the I AM of the Old Testament. What language it is proclaimed in should not make any difference.

Thanks for this information, Father.

I am wondering if the Messianic Jews and their use of G-d (omitting the vowel) is part of this Name Worshipping Heresy.

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

Fr. Panagiotes
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed 19 October 2005 3:26 pm
Jurisdiction: HOTCA
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: Patriarch Germanos V Concening the"Name-Worshippers"

Post by Fr. Panagiotes »

Archimandrit Nilos wrote:

I think there are "Name-Worshippers" to-day, also among so called "True Orthodox Christians". This is very sad. Who belongs to them ?

Sad to say but a few of the HOCNA hierarchs and clergy support this heresy which is also supported by the Moscow Patriarchate and the OCA.

Post Reply