ROCOR decides Met Lavr & MP Alexei to sign unity in May

Feel free to tell our little section of the Internet why you're right. Forum rules apply.


Post Reply
User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

ROCOR decides Met Lavr & MP Alexei to sign unity in May

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

SYNOD OF BISHOPS: December 11, 2006
An Expanded Session of the Synod of Bishops Concludes

An expanded session of the Synod of Bishops was held in New York City from December 7-10, presided over by His Eminence Metropolitan Laurus. Participating in this session were the following bishops: Archbishop Mark of Berlin and Germany; Archbishop Hilarion of Sydney, Australia and New Zealand; Archbishop Kyrill of San Francisco and Western America; Bishop Evtikhii of Ishim and Siberia; Bishop Michael of Geneva and Western Europe; Bishop Daniel of Erie; Bishop Gabriel of Manhattan; Bishop Agapit of Stuttgart and Bishop Peter of Cleveland.

Also participating in this session was Bishop Agathanel of Tavrichesk and Odessa, but only in matters connected with the adoption of the “Act of Canonical Communion,” and with his diocese, in which he and his clergymen had ceased commemorating the First Hierarch. On the latter matter, the Synod of Bishops made the following decision:

  1. Bishop Agathangel is to immediately restore the commemoration of the First Hierarch in his diocese by declaring that the cessation of commemoration of the Primate is a violation of canonical norms.

  2. His Grace Bishop Agathangel is given a three-month period to normalize the situation of the clergymen of his diocese.

The Synod of Bishops made the following decision on the report made by Protopriest Alexander Lebedeff on the 8 th joint meeting of the Commissions:

  1. To take his report into consideration and approve the Commissions' document titled “Summation of the Joint Work of the Commissions.”

  2. To include the text of the document, already adopted at the 6 th joint meeting of the ecclesiastical Commissions and approved by the Holy Synods of both parts of the Russian Orthodox Church, the “Addendum to the ‘Act of Canonical Communion.'”

  3. To approve the plan proposed by the Commissions on the time, place and rite of the ceremony of the signing of the “Act of Canonical Communion” in May 2007.

  4. To instruct Priest Serafim Gan, in coordination with the President of the Commission on talks with the Moscow Patriarchate, His Eminence Archbishop Mark, to develop a detailed plan for a visit to Russia by a delegation of the Russian Church Abroad, to be headed by His Eminence Metropolitan Laurus.

In January, 2007, a delegation headed by His Grace Bishop Peter of Cleveland will be sent to Buenos Aires and South America to conduct services and lead meetings to discuss the approaching execution of the Act of Canonical Communion.

In addition to these matters, other current events in church life were discussed.

On Saturday, December 9, the participants of the Synod of Bishops performed a funeral in absentia for His Eminence Metropolitan Vitaly, who reposed on September 12/25 of this year, along with a multitude of clergymen and a male choir under the direction of Peter A Fekula. His Eminence Metropolitan Laurus and His Eminence Archbishop Hilarion both delivered eulogies. The following day, His Eminence Metropolitan Laurus and the aforementioned bishops officiated at Divine Liturgy at the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Sign at the headquarters of the Synod of Bishops in New York on its feast day, the Kursk-Root Icon of the Mother of God, and the 25th anniversary of the glorification of the Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of Russia.

User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Address of the Synod of Bishops of the ROCOR

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

SYNOD OF BISHOPS: December 11, 2006
Address of the Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia to the God-loving Flock

"Grace be with you, mercy, and peace,
from God the Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ,
the Son of the Father, in truth and love." (2 John 1:3)

The Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia greets its brother archpastors, reverend pastors, monastics and pious laypersons, and congratulates them on the feast day of the Kursk-Root Icon of the Mother of God, the Protectress of the Russian diaspora.

It was in the presence of this great holy icon that the sessions of the expanded Synod of Bishops were held, expanded because of the importance of the matters at hand, primarily the reestablishment of the canonical unity of the Local Russian Church.

The Resolution of the IV All-Diaspora Council stated: "Bowing down before the podvig [spiritual feats] of the Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of Russia, glorified both by the Russian Church Abroad and by the Russian Church in the Fatherland, we see within them the spiritual bridge which rises above the abyss of the lethal division in the Russian Church and makes possible the restoration of that unity which is desired by all."

On the basis of this Resolution, the Council of Bishops of May 15-19, 2006, decreed: "To confirm the Act of Canonical Communion in principle, though with the stipulation that certain points be resolved…" This decision of the Council of Bishops also states that "the final confirmation of the text of the 'Act,' as well as details as to its ceremonial signing, is conferred upon the Synod of Bishops."

The Synod of Bishops, during its meeting of August 24/September 6, 2006, decreed: "On the basis of the decision of the Council of Bishops of May 15-19, 2006, to confirm and approve the 'Act on Canonical Communion' in its revised form as prepared by the church Commissions at the seventh joint meeting," and "n accordance with the directions of the Council of Bishops of 2006, to instruct the Commission on discussions with the Moscow Patriarchate, jointly with the Commission on dialog with the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, to work out the details of the ceremony of the signing of the 'Act' and the Rite of establishment of canonical communion of both parts of the Russian Orthodox Church." Further, in the same decision, we read: "To consider at the next expanded session of the Synod of Bishops, to be scheduled at the time of the feast day of the Kursk-Root Icon of the Mother of God this year, on the proposals prepared by the joint Commissions at their next meeting."

The Synod of Bishops, gathering now in its expanded form, after exhaustive deliberation, on November 25/December 8, 2006, unanimously adopted the Resolution stating: "To approve the proposals of the Commissions on the time, place and Rite of the ceremonious signing of the 'Act of Canonical Communion,'" and instructed designated individuals to "develop a detailed plan for a visit to Russia of a delegation of the Russian Church Abroad headed by His Eminence Metropolitan Laurus for the ceremonious signing of the 'Act.'"

Of course, at this stage, it proved impossible to fully resolve all questions, as was noted in the Epistle of the Council of Bishops of 2006: "We do not intend to idealize the situation; without a doubt, there are problems in both parts of the Russian Church which demand correction." This is pointed to by the members of the IV All-Diaspora Council, who proposed in their Resolution that these matters be relegated to a future Local [ Pomestny ] Council: "We hope that the forthcoming Local Council of One Russian Church will settle remaining unresolved church problems."

One of these problems is the continuing participation of representatives of the Moscow Patriarchate in the World Council of Churches. The IV All-Diaspora Council addressed this fact in its Resolution: "From discussions at the Council it is apparent that the participation of the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate in the World Council of Churches evokes confusion among our clergy and flock. With heartfelt pain we ask the hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate to heed the plea of our flock to expediently remove this temptation."

Therefore, the Synod of Bishops viewed in a positive light the resolution of the Diocese of the Midwest of the Orthodox Church in America, in which the Diocesan Assembly requested the immediate withdrawal of the Orthodox Church in America from the National and World Councils of Churches. It becomes clear that the desire to remove this temptation is shared by the flocks of other Local Orthodox Churches.

We regard with pain that the discussion of the process of reconciliation of the two parts of the Russian Orthodox Church is not being conducted in the spirit of peace and mutual respect in all places. Especially harsh expressions are appearing in internet forums, in which some anonymous writers spread completely false information on the negotiating process, and also slander the First Hierarch, the bishops and clergymen of our Church.

In it September Address, the Synod of Bishops stated: "We do not intend to depart from our positions of principle, in particular with regard to the ecumenical movement. We intend to continue to firmly speak out in condemnation of the so-called 'branch theory' and of joint prayer with heretics, which is emphasized in our anathema of ecumenism adopted by the Council of Bishops of 1983. This is reflected in the documents of the church Commissions confirmed by both Holy Synods and published in the official publications of the two parts of the Russian Orthodox Church. From this we see that in the Moscow Patriarchate, our attitude towards the heresy of ecumenism has long ago been absorbed. That is why we are not compromising the inherited principles which have always guided us…

"We will continue to maintain the spirit of our great fathers, the founders of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, following their legacy and the historical path of our Church. To carry this great inheritance to Russia is the mission we strive to fulfill."

The participants of this expanded session of the Synod of Bishops confirm this good intention, hoping that the process of reconciliation between the two parts of the Russian Orthodox Church will further serve towards bringing into church life all the people of Russia, "in the Fatherland and in the diaspora."

In the spirit of love and peace, we speak all of you, dear fathers, brothers and sisters, the words of the Apostle:

"Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment" (I Corinthians 1:10).

The Epistle of the Council of Bishops of 2006 contains the following appeal:

"And so, we turn to our dear flock with the prayerful call to set aside quarrels and differences, and to join together for the salvific task of reestablishing the unity of the Russian Church."

We repeat this plea, and also these words of edification from the "Epistle of the Council of Bishops to the God-loving Flock":

"We now call upon our God-loving flock to prayerfully support the constructive task begun by our IV All-Diaspora Council. Its culmination will be the reestablishment of the unity of the Local Russian Church desired by all."

"Finally, brethren, farewell. Be perfect, be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace; and the God of love and peace shall be with you" (2 Corinthians 13:11). Amen.

  • Laurus,
    Metropolitan of Eastern America and New York,
    First Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia.

  • Mark, Archbishop of Berlin and Germany.

  • Hilarion, Archbishop of Sydney, Australia and New Zealand.

  • Kyrill, Archbishop of San Francisco and Western America.

  • Evtikhii, Bishop of Ishim and Siberia.

  • Michael, Bishop of Geneva and Western Europe.

  • Gabriel, Bishop of Manhattan.

  • Agapit, Bishop of Stuttgart.

  • Peter, Bishop of Cleveland.

November 26/December 9, 2006

User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Exceptions!

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

It is interesting to note that reports from the Synod were reporting that Bps Daniel, Agathagel, and Gabriel did not sign the document for union, but it ends up that Bp Gabriel did sign and the only bishops obstaining from signing for union were Bishops Daniel and Agathangel.

User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

Act of Canonical Communion slated for signature in May 2007
http://www.tass.ru/eng/level2.html?NewsID=11074090

NEW YORK, December 12 (Itar-Tass) - The Hierarchal Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (ROCOR) has approved proposals made by the negotiating commissions of the ROCOR and the Moscow Patriarchate about a date and venue of a ceremony to sign an Act of Canonical Communion of the two branches of the Russian Orthodox Church.

An enlarged session of the ROCOR Hierarchal Synod took place here from December 7 to 10 under the chairmanship of Metropolitan Lavr (Laurus).

In an address to the faithful, the ROCOR Hierarchal Synod announced that it had unanimously passed a resolution that reads as follows: "We resolve to approve the Commissions' proposals about a date, venue and a sequence of rites for a ceremonial signing of the Act of Canonical Communion". The Synod assigned certain clergymen to work out a detailed plan for a visit to Russia by a ROCOR delegation led by Metropolitan Lavr to sign the Act, The signing ceremony is to be held in May 2007.

User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

NRS Interview with Bishop Gabriel of Why He Signed Union Act

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

According to NRS at http://nrs.com/print/131206_163345_11560.html

Bishop Gabriel said that his signature under the Act is for the sake of sobornost and avoid divisiveness. Возможность раскола, между тем, сохраняется, поскольку свои подписи под документом отказались ставить епископ Таврический и Одесский Агафангел и епископ Ирийский Даниил.The division, however, continues, because their signatures to the document are missing the names of the Bishop of Odessa, Agafangel, and the Bishop of Erie, Daniel. Последний отказался участвовать в заседании Синода, заявив свое несогласие с его политикой и сославшись на нездоровье.The latter had refused to participate in the meeting of the Holy Synod, stating his disagreement with the synod's policies and referring to the crisis

Post Reply