Moscow, Beijing to sign declaration on [new] world order

The resting place of threads that were very valid in 2004, but not so much in 2024. Basically this is a giant historical archive.


Post Reply
User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5127
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Moscow, Beijing to sign declaration on [new] world order

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

Moscow, Beijing to sign declaration on world order
14:28

MOSCOW, June 29 (RIA Novosti) - Chinese leader Hu Jintao will arrive here Thursday to sign a joint declaration on world order in the 21st Century, a spokesman for the Russian Foreign Ministry wrote in an article published in the government daily Rossiiskaya Gazeta Wednesday.

"This is a crucial document that reflects the convergence of Russia and China's fundamental positions on key issues in modern world order - our common view for the outlook of the development of humankind," Alexander Yakovenko wrote.

According to Yakovenko, the declaration will affirm the parties' commitment to forming a new fair and rational world order and to increasing the role of the UN in international politics.

Russia and China will announce the unacceptability of monopolizing global affairs, dividing states into those who lead and those who are led, imposing models for social development from the outside and applying double standards, he wrote.

Yakovenko wrote the sides will urge the international community to combine efforts in order to create a new architecture of security by shaping a global strategy to counteract new threats and challenges under the UN aegis, the article reads.

Russia and China have launched work on a mid-term program for developing bilateral trade and economic relations for 2006-2010, he wrote.

According to Yakovenko, the document will provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential for bilateral cooperation and offer specific recommendations for solving the existing problems that in some cases stall the development of Russian-Chinese trade and economic cooperation. Economic cooperation remains the pivotal sphere of Russian-Chinese interaction, he wrote.

User avatar
joasia
Protoposter
Posts: 1858
Joined: Tue 29 June 2004 7:19 pm
Jurisdiction: RTOC
Location: Montreal

Post by joasia »

Yakovenko wrote the sides will urge the international community to combine efforts in order to create a new architecture of security by shaping a global strategy to counteract new threats and challenges under the UN aegis, the article reads.

"Architecture"...interesting choice of words since the freemasons believe in the Great Architect.

I wonder who will be the leader of this new security. Who will be the king of the new world order?

Create in me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me. (Ps. 50)

User avatar
TomS
Protoposter
Posts: 1010
Joined: Wed 4 June 2003 8:26 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by TomS »

joasia wrote:

"Architecture"...interesting choice of words since the freemasons believe in the Great Architect.

[DELETED NONSENSE BY MOD...] If they had said "We see this as a great leap forward", would that say the same thing because they used the word "Great" in the sentence?

[MORE DELETED NONSENSE BY MOD...]

----------------------------------------------------
They say that I am bad news. They say "Stay Away."

OrthodoxyOrDeath

Post by OrthodoxyOrDeath »

Tom,

There is no need or room for you to be so abrasive, which is your general method of communicating with everyone here lately. I think that is about enough of this, please reflect on this and I will know how you want to move forward by your next post. I hope you plan to contribute in the future, but it won't be at the expense of the climate of the forum.

User avatar
TomS
Protoposter
Posts: 1010
Joined: Wed 4 June 2003 8:26 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by TomS »

OrthodoxyOrDeath wrote:

..and I will know how you want to move forward by your next post. I hope you plan to contribute in the future, but it won't be at the expense of the climate of the forum.

What? You consider the statement "Gimme a Break" to be abusive?

"Bite me, pal." Now that is abusive.

----------------------------------------------------
They say that I am bad news. They say "Stay Away."

OrthodoxyOrDeath

Post by OrthodoxyOrDeath »

It has nothing at all to do with what I find abrasive - you can call me names for all I care; The problem is that most of your messages are insulting to most people.

Let's just be nice. We all think are lives have some degree of privacy, even from those closest to us, until one day we find out we were in a fish bowl and that everything we've done has either brought us closer to God or has driven us away. And what an aweful feeling it is when we are not wanted by love.

Post Reply