Appendix III: Answer to a Critic

尼古拉前执事 · Post by **尼古拉前执事** » Wed 25 May 2005 8:38 pm

Reader Benjamin · Post by **Reader Benjamin** » Fri 17 June 2005 8:52 pm

I recognize many of the things that the Critic has said. Other wise I don’t know what else to say.

romiosini · Post by **romiosini** » Thu 4 August 2005 1:17 pm

See, what the Critics of Father Seraphim Rose, whom are, firstly Archbishop Lazar Puhalo who claim that those articles and statements are fake and creations of Father Seraphim. From where and from what? Father Seraphim has left proof with his sources. And his sources were direct from Orthodox Christian Sources. Another Priest that openly said that those things Father Seraphim was saying were false was Father Stylian (Stanley) Harakas, who said that he never heard such things. If only these alleged "educated" theologians studied all possible Orthodox Sources, then they would notice that these statements of Father Seraphim would very Orthodox. Or according to Archbishop Lazar, Saint Basil the New (March 26) was just simply heretic, right? According to him, these were heretical teachings. And Saint Theodora of Alexandria's experience was also just deluded fantasies. How so? If the Saints of God were witnesses to such experiences, then how these Theologians would prove them wrong and accuse them of falseness?