Lord Have Mercy!

An online Synaxaristes including martyrologies and hagiographies of the lives of the Orthodox Church's saints. All Forum Rules apply. No polemics. No heated discussions. No name-calling.


romiosini

Lord Have Mercy!

Post by romiosini »

Lord Have Mercy!

Last edited by romiosini on Sat 17 September 2005 9:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
bogoliubtsy
Sr Member
Posts: 666
Joined: Wed 16 April 2003 4:53 pm
Location: Russia

Post by bogoliubtsy »

I will only speak of ROCOR.

A saint is officially glorified by a local Church. Then that Church invites the other local Churches to include the saint in their calendars. Since relations between ROCOR and the Autocephalous Churches have been strained for some time, this "invitation" for glorification is not always extended between ROCOR and the other Churches. However, there are cases where the glorification just makes sense to all. For instance, with St. Herman of Alaska, who was glorified by ROCOR and the OCA almost at the same time. Also, with St. Xenia of Petersburg who was also glorified in Russia, the Optina Elders, St. John of Kronstadt, etc.

Interestingly, St. Peter the Aleut(I don't believe he was officially glorified by ROCOR, but I could be wrong) is included in an icon commonly used as ROCOR's All Saints of North America icon. However, St. John of San Francisco, who has not been officially recognized yet by the OCA, does not appear to be present in the OCA's most commonly used icon of the same feast.

Nektarios14
Member
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri 10 January 2003 7:48 pm
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Post by Nektarios14 »

However, St. John of San Francisco, who has not been officially recognized yet by the OCA, does not appear to be present in the OCA's most commonly used icon of the same feast.

Isn't there an OCA Monastery though named after Saint John of San Francisco? Were they always under the OCA or were they recieved in after they were established....?

bogoliubtsy
Sr Member
Posts: 666
Joined: Wed 16 April 2003 4:53 pm
Location: Russia

Post by bogoliubtsy »

Νεκτάριος wrote:

However, St. John of San Francisco, who has not been officially recognized yet by the OCA, does not appear to be present in the OCA's most commonly used icon of the same feast.

Isn't there an OCA Monastery though named after Saint John of San Francisco? Were they always under the OCA or were they recieved in after they were established....?

Yes, there is. As well as a parish or two named after him, and OCA parishes which have St. John's image included in frescoes of the Saints of North America. Still, the OCA does not list him in their calendar of saints. I spoke with Fr. John Matusiak about this a couple of years ago. He said the reason St. John is not included in the OCA's calendar is because ROCOR never gave the invitation for the OCA to accept the ROCOR's glorification. With time, I'm sure St. John will be officially recognized, because, as you noted, local glorification is already taking place within the OCA.

OrthodoxyOrDeath

Post by OrthodoxyOrDeath »

Romiosini,

I can assure you no Orthodox Christian will go along with the ecumenist church on this one...how sad; and what spiritually sick mind would even suggest such a grossly demented concept as this.

http://www.orthodoxnews.netfirms.com/12 ... etired.htm

Anastasios
Sr Member
Posts: 886
Joined: Thu 7 November 2002 11:40 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: GOC-Archbishop Kallinikos
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

Post by Anastasios »

St Nektarios's Icon stands in the Cathedral of St Markella (GOC) in Astoria, NY.

The Synod in Resistance recognizes St Nicholas Planas.

Don't know about the others.

anastasios

Disclaimer: Many older posts were made before my baptism and thus may not reflect an Orthodox point of view.
Please do not message me with questions about the forum or moderation requests. Jonathan Gress (jgress) will be able to assist you.
Please note that I do not subscribe to "Old Calendar Ecumenism" and believe that only the Synod of Archbishop Kallinikos is the canonical GOC of Greece. I do believe, however, that we can break down barriers and misunderstandings through prayer and discussion on forums such as this one.

User avatar
Seraphim Reeves
Member
Posts: 493
Joined: Sun 27 October 2002 2:10 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Seraphim Reeves »

OOD,

I've been told in passing many times, that it was likely that Athenagoras was in fact a Mason. After going through some of the books in my collection, I found a testimony to this, in a book published by an RC traditionalist group called Previews of the New Papacy, page 170. It's a caption accompanied by a photo of the person (a Mason himself) who made the claim...

According to reliable sources, Athenagoras was a Mason. For example, grandmaster of the Italian Freemasonry, Giuliano di Bernardo (left) states this clearly in his book The Philosophy of Freemasonry: "Many Anglican, Orthodox, and Lutheran bishops were members of Masonry ... the Primate of the Anglican church, Fisher, and patriarch Athenagoras were Masons. And Pope John XXIII initiated the ecumenical dialogue with them in an ambience of fraternal understanding." (30 Dias, March 1992)

Seraphim

Post Reply