Not that I would consider looking at it for one minute anyway.
But I fully expected to read that the anchors were negative toward the recent disaster. Perhaps too tentative, thereby catering to "Public Opinion", that devil - but I was shocked to read this, the only paragraph to which I paid much attention in this article which mostly didn't interest me. I see the dissection of what happened on the court as irrelevant almost, as surely it was all programmed in advance. No one would imagine that the court would be "allowed" to refuse this evil agenda.
"Conservatives watching Fox News and hoping for a pro-traditional values perspective are likely to be seriously disappointed as well. The new Fox star, Megyn Kelly, is getting rave reviews from the liberals for defending homosexual and transgender rights. A special report by Peter LaBarbera examines how Fox has been almost as biased on this issue as other media, calling the channel “unfair, unbalanced and afraid.” The word “afraid” describes the general failure to challenge the homosexual movement, into which Fox News has been pouring a significant amount of money for many years. Indeed, some “conservatives” have gone way over to the other side, with Greg Gutfeld, another rising Fox star, insisting that homosexual marriage is a conservative concept."
http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTop ... Scalia.htm
This channel has been POURING MONEY into homosexual causes all these years ? What a disgusting commentary on their 2-facedness.
Also, did anyone else read that something like 301 + so-called "Republicans" have signed on that they approve this heinous decision ? More and more Republicans are reputedly joining the list. What in the WORLD ??