I am not disobeying my spiritual father as he did not share my quasi sedevacantist views (sh. don't tell anyone its a secret
) sort a cut me loose. I am still searching for a sedevacantist priest that is close enough to serve as my confessor (my old one I went to once a month and he was 200 miles away). I may go to the CMRI Bishop that has a chapel up in Plainville.
OOD, what you are seeing at that site is the relatively good stuff. there's a lot worse out there BELIEVE ME. However NOW makes it a very strict point to not publish anything that is not verrified by several sources. BTW, my site was just listed in the archive of NOW yesterday, I'm psyked.
What is necessary for a Mass (would the term "Missa" be better for you? I know I like it better but maybe that's just my opinions that Latin always outranks English) to have grace (to use your terminology) is for it to one, contain the actual canon as approved by the Church and two, if nothing else to have the words "This is My Body...." "This is My Blood, shed for you and for MANY" (Pro Multis not Pro Omnis as the Novus ordites pray).
And there is also a theological position that heretics and those incommunion with heretics loose the ability to form the intention necessary for the confecting of any Sacrament.
However the root problem of the Novus Ordo Sacraments is in the consecration of the Bishop. The new form removes what was previously seen as necessary for the consecration of a Bishop.
It is indeed sad when the Anglican Book of Common Prayer is closer to the real Catholic Mass (The Mass of St. Gregory, the Mass of the Ages, the Mass for which teh Martyrs (of the reformation) died) than is the Novus Ordo service.
Joe Zollars
PS: my former spiritual father also considers feeneyites to be heretics, and therefore I now consider him to be a heretic.