A mass exodus of Christians just occurred, in which four thousand Christians are now fleeing from the northeastern Syrian city of Hassakeh from the Islamic invasion of ISIS.
On Thursday, June 25, ISIS entered Hassakeh, rushing into numerous neighborhoods, compelling 120,000 people to flee the city. Amongst these 120,000 people were four thousand Christians. According to one report:
http://shoebat.com/2015/07/02/mass-exod ... -invasion/
Lord have mercy.
Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.
If ISIS is an "Islamic" invasion, then how come the news media is always reporting on ISIS blowing up churches and mosques, and not synagogues? Islamic terrorists preferring to blow up mosques over synagogues? Is this even logical or plausible?
It would be more accurate to brandish ISIS as an invasion of the Israeli Secret Intelligence Services
We cannot trust the lying press or the liars in the U.S. government. They have been caught and exposed repeatedly as lying and fabricating news events to manipulate public sentiment.
They have a vested interest in scare-mongering Americans and the West into an irrational fear of ISIS and Islamic terror everywhere, so Americans will support the wholesale military slaughter of Arabs/Muslims around the world.
"Yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service. And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me."
It is quite obvious why ignorant Christians and other lovers of this world are all readily prepared to accept the notion that Islamic terror poses the single greatest threat to civilization.
Islam terror groups are perceived as an external threat. It is a foreign enemy invading. Most Americans (especially ignorant Christians duped by the Zionists) have no knowledge of Islam or even much experience with Moslems, so they know hardly anything about it. They don't have any Moslem friends, which in itself would be commendable, if they were not such hypocrites, because Christians need not befriend the enemies of Christ. But then these hypocrites who wouldn't dream of associating with Moslems other than in circumstances where they encounter a few unavoidable acquaintances in the workplace, go and befriend countless Jews, who are no less the enemies of Christ than Moslems.
Moslems are easier to identify. They often look different, with darker skin, hair and other features, and different manners of dress. All this makes it so easy to hone in on them as a very easily identifiable perceived threat.
The simple-minded solution of these hypocrites? Subscribe to that devil Bush's Doctrine of Preemption: simply go and bomb them all before they come and get us.
The real reason why these sectarians, who style themselves Christians, like to blame all the violence and terror in the world on Islam, is because they are lovers of this world (and hence enemies of God) who do not want to acknowledge their own evil deeds, and culpability.
If they were to acknowledge that the real threat to America and the West is not some foreign rag-tag group of ISIS terrorists, but in fact their own idolatry of Hollywood and the leaders of their own government, then their convicted conscience would dictate the necessity of having to give up all their sinful vices, including the Hollywood films and television shows and satanic songs and other pleasurable entertainments they are so addicted to. Criticizing our leaders comes at a price: we might actually have to suffer a bit of persecution for the cross of Christ.
The quickest way to bring some persecution your way is to stand up and boldly oppose the stiff-necked Jews and their war against Christ and the Church, conducted through media outlets such as Hollywood and the press.
The quickest way to make upwards of $30 million a year, like Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, etc. is to bow down to the demands of the Jews and go work for the diabolical Fox News network, condemning radical Islam every other breath, while hypocritically defending radical Judaism, constantly calling Israel our greatest friend.
Lovers of this world don't want to abandon their servitude to their favorite television shows, movies, and music, so they deny that Hollywood is pushing the homosexual agenda down our throats. Muslims don't make all the TV shows and films in America, where seemingly almost every single one has a 'homosexual' character these days.
Speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their conscience seared with a hot iron, these hypocrites go about vilifying radical Islam at every turn, while ignoring the threat of radical terrorist Judaism, a.k.a. ISIS.
Excellent, Cyprian ! I am SO GLAD someone finally stood up against all this shameful hate projected onto Muslims.
When what you are saying perceptively is that it's a convenient avenue to dump all their own hate for themselves for being
such weakling cogs of the machine onto a largely unknown group which has never hurt them !
How has any Muslim hurt any member of this Cafe ? Can anyone come forward with a TRUE story rather than a shrill lie ?
It's almost like the "open season on Muslims" by not just the devotees of Fox News but included in that station's mentality, many otherwise upright Orthodox, is an excuse to get out all the deep dark frustrations and anger lurking in their subsconscious minds.
I would go so far as to call it a type of "abuse". For that is when a stronger person irrationally takes out his own fury on person perceived as weaker or defenseless, such as a child or a wife. Here, it is unleashed onto a whole people, perhaps a fifth of the globe. Does that sound rational ?
The mainstream media never give REAL Muslims [ as opposed to pet, tame in-house vetted "Muslims playing an acting role only" ] a chance to speak in defense of the ridiculous phony statements made every day in America. By the way, this campaign could not succeed in France, where knowledge is too great of Algeria, the former French colony. Only here would this primitive attempt succeed to sway minds without letting the other side speak for themselves. It's because Americans refuse to want to learn anything of substance about any foreign country, but particularly never Islamic ones due to the unending drivel about the latest supposed activities of the DREAD made-up "issis".
The only time Americans are allowed to hear about foreigners is in the context of whether that country accepts, applauds or hesitates over homosexuals ! This is how diabolical the entire media programming campaign AND the forces behind it are.
How many times have you ever seen a REAL Muslim interviewed on any major station to give his side of the accusations made ?
Never, it's always an Israeli ambassador or supposed specialist who is given the entire stage to fabricate any lies he wishes.
No rebuttal is permitted. How fair is this ? No one is allowed on camera who is not already in the pocket of Tel Aviv. No American politician, no journalist, no academic is considered to be interviewed if he or she is not approved by the "right people".
I challenge those Orthodox who continually regurgitate these tired lies about "the Hagarenes" to actually go talk to a Muslim.
I met a nice woman from Saudi Arabia the other day at the library. She was all the things that American and other Western women are not : modestly dressed, modest in behavior, feminine, laughing, vital, full of life, curious, and above all, a real person. Most American women of her age are phony, superficial and frankly have almost nothing to contribute of any value. She never once brought up Islam in any form. She wisely said nothing about the life here and tried to strike an upbeat note though one can imagine it would be a shock to come straight from a warm and loving family like hers into a society which can only be described as deranged. She seemed to handle all this with aplomb rather than even a hint of criticism of America or modern Western mores.
She was immensely grateful to get the specialized advanced training for which she was sent by her employer to a particular program.
She was mainly worried about finding the right husband for, as she said "Having children is the reason for marriage, having a family life together". Isn't that refreshing rather than "threatening" ??
That really woke me up, Cyprian, when you said that each film has to have a homosexual role in it now.
I knew I couldn't watch of any of these media productions which go by the innocent title of "movie". But now I can see better why I would never tolerate even a second of this programming.
A little unrelated, but speaking about how it's now usual to include them in one's circle of friends if one has no spiritual discernment, I was shocked when a woman of maybe 60 wrote on a forum casually "My homosexual friends say that ..."
I immediately stopped reading her post and lost all respect for her as one of the more knowledgeable people in that arena.
She had projected a conservative image, raised in Episcoplianism but attending Catholic school.
How could she and so many others not care with whom they associate ?
