Fasting = one meal per day?

The practice of living the life in Christ: fasting, vigil lamps, head-coverings, family life, icon corners, and other forms of Orthopraxy. All Forum Rules apply.


Post Reply
User avatar
Jean-Serge
Protoposter
Posts: 1451
Joined: Fri 1 April 2005 11:04 am
Location: Paris (France)
Contact:

Re: Fasting = one meal per day?

Post by Jean-Serge »

jgress wrote:

I don't agree with you about human strength. The strength to endure long fasts, pray unceasingly and endure torture and death for the faith is not natural to fallen humans. It comes from God. So a strong faith and humility are essential from the beginning. We can't achieve salvation by our own efforts, but only by God's grace. Therefore the ONLY path lies through obedience.

Yes, I agree, it is potentially unlimited thanks to God's grace. I wanted to add this too. But God's grace comes with the concept of synergy that says that God add his grace to your efforts, depending on them (no pain, no gain), depending on your virtues, on your life and globally all the good works you do are made thanks to God (see commentary for the Sunday of the Pharisian and Publican attributed to Saint John Chrysosotom). To quote the Elder Siluan of the Athos : "God gives the prayer to the one who prays", which expresses the concept of synergy. But I am far from unceasing prayer and so on!

The idea I have of obedience is a bit different. I was never requested blind obedience when I joined True orthodoxy first with ROCIE (2005). The notion of blind obedience where sometimes the abba gives stupid things to do (or that seems stupid) is typical to monastic places. There was also a sort of idea that they were no longer spiritual fathers, but it can be a problem of language because by "spiritual father", some people think confessor, other staretz (like Saint Seraphin, so a real living saint) and finally nobody knows exactly what is the scope of the job of the relationship, blind obedience or taking advice? This is why I feel entirely OK with the idea of having wise advisors, the fact that you use the word "obedience" troubles me a bit. From what I observed, we were never in a situation of abdicating our will but in the situation of receiving advice from the confessor; he was not a dictator requiring obedience. What I always heard that grace came in addition to one's efforts (synergy) but due to the simple fact of obeying, never. Any source, out of monastic context?

I am also very cautious with which would be a mistaken notion of spiritual fatherhood, in particular with total obedience, due to the 2 quotations below from here:

Elder Makarios of Optina Monastery : "It is certainly a great consolation, and a great help on the way, to find a director under whose wise guidance our will is cured of self-will, our mind of self-regard. But in these days, it is most difficult to find one."

Bishop Ignatios Brianchaninov, cautioned those in his care: "Conceited and self-opinionated people love to teach and give directions. They are not concerned as to the value of their advice. It does not occur to them that they can cause irreparable damage to their neighbor by their misguided advice, which is taken by an inexperienced beginner with irresponsible confidence ... . They want to make an impression on the beginner, and subject him morally to themselves. They want human praise. They want to be reputed saints, astute elders, teachers with spiritual insight. They want to nourish their insatiable vanity."

And naturally I gave no advice to people regarding their spiritual lives but simply tells a personal experience that people should not apply to themselves.

I hope there are no misunderstandings.

Priidite, poklonimsja i pripadem ko Hristu.

jgress
Moderator
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu 4 March 2010 1:06 pm
Jurisdiction: GOC/HOTCA

Re: Fasting = one meal per day?

Post by jgress »

No the "obedience" I'm talking about is not total in that sense. In my experience, my confessing priest only expected obedience in certain matters: keeping my prayer rule; keeping the fasts according to his instructions; receiving Communion when he tells me to; and finally particular penances. I think these are all things that your regular confessor should have a say in. But I never experienced the total monastic-type obedience, since I'm not a monk. ;)

User avatar
Jean-Serge
Protoposter
Posts: 1451
Joined: Fri 1 April 2005 11:04 am
Location: Paris (France)
Contact:

Re: Fasting = one meal per day?

Post by Jean-Serge »

I found the quotation of Saint John Palamas regarding fasting being one meal a day at sunset, this being easy for anybody. It is in Homily 9 "In the time of fasting and prayer".

The forty day period of fast is not your whole life and every day your fasting ends when the sun sets. Going without food to this extent is surely easy and reasonable for nearly everyone.

Page 62 in Saint Gregory Palamas, The homilies (Mount Thabor Publishing)

Priidite, poklonimsja i pripadem ko Hristu.

User avatar
aszurkus
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue 21 January 2025 10:39 am
Faith: Christian Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

Re: Fasting = one meal per day?

Post by aszurkus »

I hope everyone is having a good Great Lent! Could anyone clarify directly—does the akrivia of “one meal after 3 PM” mean that’s the only time you can drink liquids, or is liquid permitted only after 3 PM and into the night? Or can liquids be consumed throughout the day, with food restricted to the one meal at 3 PM?

Alexander Szurkus ☦︎

eish
Member
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon 11 March 2024 2:15 pm
Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Autonomous Metropolia

Re: Fasting = one meal per day?

Post by eish »

aszurkus wrote: Tue 4 March 2025 12:05 pm

I hope everyone is having a good Great Lent! Could anyone clarify directly—does the akrivia of “one meal after 3 PM” mean that’s the only time you can drink liquids, or is liquid permitted only after 3 PM and into the night? Or can liquids be consumed throughout the day, with food restricted to the one meal at 3 PM?

Dry fasting is not a universal rule. It used to be more common. Asking on a public forum implies that one is not under the guidance of a spiritual father and needs help while presumably still searching for a church. In that case it makes more sense to keep the more general, less strict rule (or try) until a confessor can be found. He will need to assign a rule appropriate to your condition. The clergy could advise you better than I can but they may also be hesitant to give advice when they don't know you and you are not under their care.

A word of advice when you're on your own: slow progress. You can crash pretty suddenly if you eat wrong or too little for a month and a half.

User avatar
Suaidan
Protoposter
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu 8 April 2004 2:31 pm
Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Autonomous Metropolia of the Americas
Location: Northeast PA

Re: Fasting = one meal per day?

Post by Suaidan »

aszurkus wrote: Tue 4 March 2025 12:05 pm

I hope everyone is having a good Great Lent! Could anyone clarify directly—does the akrivia of “one meal after 3 PM” mean that’s the only time you can drink liquids, or is liquid permitted only after 3 PM and into the night? Or can liquids be consumed throughout the day, with food restricted to the one meal at 3 PM?

I agree with @eish on this one. If you are new to fasting, focus on the abstinence and less on the amount of time not eating, and try to find guidance from a priest in the true Church. Even xerophagy allows for water (and bread) so if you are new to fasting, it should really be done under the guidance of a priest. This means even in the early Church they understood water was allowed (and that means black coffee and tea are generally also allowed outside days people were communing, and they could drink liquids after.)

And as a priest, no, I am not giving random fasting advice that can be misunderstood over the Internet. I've had enough cases of trying to answer "by the book" and then getting attacked because they misunderstood the answer and screwed up badly.

(And yes, I did put the xerophagy thing on Gab, Twitter and Youtube up to encourage experienced Orthodox to do something. I've been Orthodox over 25 years (and no, "not since I was born"; I'm going on 50). One should not follow any strict example of fasting to puff oneself up on their social media apps.

EDIT: Deleted/edited posts with a warning.

Fr Joseph Suaidan (Suaiden, same guy)

User avatar
aszurkus
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue 21 January 2025 10:39 am
Faith: Christian Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

Re: Fasting = one meal per day?

Post by aszurkus »

Suaidan wrote: Tue 4 March 2025 3:12 pm
aszurkus wrote: Tue 4 March 2025 12:05 pm

I hope everyone is having a good Great Lent! Could anyone clarify directly—does the akrivia of “one meal after 3 PM” mean that’s the only time you can drink liquids, or is liquid permitted only after 3 PM and into the night? Or can liquids be consumed throughout the day, with food restricted to the one meal at 3 PM?

I agree with @eish on this one. If you are new to fasting, focus on the abstinence and less on the amount of time not eating, and try to find guidance from a priest in the true Church. Even xerophagy allows for water (and bread) so if you are new to fasting, it should really be done under the guidance of a priest. This means even in the early Church they understood water was allowed (and that means black coffee and tea are generally also allowed outside days people were communing, and they could drink liquids after.)

And as a priest, no, I am not giving random fasting advice that can be misunderstood over the Internet. I've had enough cases of trying to answer "by the book" and then getting attacked because they misunderstood the answer and screwed up badly.

(And yes, I did put the xerophagy thing on Gab, Twitter and Youtube up to encourage experienced Orthodox to do something. I've been Orthodox over 25 years (and no, "not since I was born"; I'm going on 50). One should not follow any strict example of fasting to puff oneself up on their social media apps.

EDIT: Deleted/edited posts with a warning.

Thank you for your help and concern—I truly appreciate your guidance and the reminder that fasting should always be done under the direction of a Priest. I am indeed speaking with my Priest about this and will continue to follow his advice when it comes to my own fasting, rather than applying anything strictly on my own.

That said, I’m curious about the akrivia, not because I intend to follow it rigidly, but just because I’d like to understand it better. When you mention that water (and by extension black coffee, and tea) was allowed in the early Church, does that mean that even on strict fasting days and during xerophagy, it was assumed that one would drink water throughout the day to stay hydrated? I’d like to learn more about how this was approached historically.

Again, I really appreciate your time and wisdom on this!

Alexander Szurkus ☦︎

Post Reply