Blackout drill - possible false flag?

[Maria]

Maria, you said:

Our solar system is a binary system with an asteroid belt consisting of the remains of a planet that blew up a long time ago. My father who was an astronomer said that our sun (a binary sun system) is slowly dying, but we still have billions of years left.

Can you provide evidence for this claim? I can find no evidence that our system is binary. Why do you believe it?

My dad was a mathematician and taught physics and astrophysics at the university. He was simply teaching the wisdom of his time. He was working with the US government so he had access to the latest research by JPL and NASA. He said that our solar system is a binary one from the latest evidence, but that the "dead" star companion was way out in space in its own orbit, but that it is not visible as it does not give out rays like our primary sun. He mentioned something about telltale wobbles and the science of magnetic attraction that can be calculated with highly advanced math and that those calculations indicate a missing planet and a smaller companion dwarf sun. I do not have access to his lecture notes. My mom might but she does not know how to operate his computer.

[jgress]

Yes the so-called Nemesis hypothesis. It was seriously entertained for a while, but as far as I know the consensus of astronomers now is there is no brown dwarf orbiting the Sun.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis_(h ... ical_star)

[Maria]

Yes the so-called Nemesis hypothesis. It was seriously entertained for a while, but as far as I know the consensus of astronomers now is there is no brown dwarf orbiting the Sun.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis_(h ... ical_star)

Yes, the government now has discredited the "Nemesis" hypothesis, but according to my father, very high level mathematics (far above advanced calculus and differential equations) such as that taught at Georgia Tech proves that we do have a missing planet in now what is the asteroid belt (its debris field) and that there is a dwarf burnt-out sun. Since this companion dwarf has its own unique orbit, it traverses the sun every 3600 years, usually without incident. But lately, we are getting a lot of huge meteors and comets that are probably associated with this interloper. What happened in approximately 1600 BC?

[arcmode]

Since this companion dwarf has its own unique orbit, it traverses the sun every 3600 years, usually without incident.

Where do you get this number? We should admit what we know and what we do not know.

[jgress]

Since this companion dwarf has its own unique orbit, it traverses the sun every 3600 years, usually without incident.

Where do you get this number? We should admit what we know and what we do not know.

Sorry, arcmode, but I couldn't resist noting that you don't seem to apply the same skeptical rigor to the various conspiracy websites you constantly bring up.

Robert Conquest quipped "everyone is a reactionary in the subject he knows something about". Perhaps here one could say "everyone is a skeptic in the subject he knows something about.

[arcmode]

Sorry, arcmode, but I couldn't resist noting that you don't seem to apply the same skeptical rigor to the various conspiracy websites you constantly bring up.

How could you possibly know how much skeptical rigor I have applied to anything?

You would have to have applied such skeptical rigor to those sites yourself, and found that their claims were not factual in order to accuse me of not having done the same.

If you have done so, please provide some evidence of your efforts, or apply some skeptical rigor to your own assumptions and don't tell me what I have or have not done.

[Maria]

Arcmode,

I linked the Marshall Masters only as an example of someone who believes in this dwarf companion star, but who is heavily involved in New Age propaganda, so I do not trust him. I just wanted to get a response from the readers, but I did not endorse him in any way. There are others out there who are more credible.

The two government sites concerning dwarf companion stars and binary systems should be factual unless you are skeptical about what they have to say.