The Name-Worshiping Heresy vs Monastic practice

Feel free to tell our little section of the Internet why you're right. Forum rules apply.


Post Reply
User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

The Name-Worshiping Heresy vs Monastic practice

Post by Maria »

I am quoting this post that Fr. Silouan originally posted in another forum at St. Euphrosynos Cafe:

----- Original Message -----
From: Fr. Panagiotes Carras
To: Orthodox Info Egroup
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:21 PM
Subject: [OrthodoxInfo] ΤΗΕ ΝΑΜΕ-WORSHIPPING HERESY

ΤΗΕ ΝΑΜΕ-WORSHIPPING HERESY

The Name-Worshipping Heresy is barely 100 years old. It was started in 1907 by a Russian monk named Illarion who wrote a book that was intended to populariz­e the Jesus prayer. Instead of inspiring piety, this book created a heresy. In his book, Illarion spoke of his spiritual experience with the Jesus Prayer and came to the conclusion that The name of God is God Himself and can produce miracles. The book became extremely popular among the Russian monks on Mount Athos. Many of them argued that, since according to the ancient Greek philosopher, Plato, the name of an object exists before the object itself does, so the name of God must pre-exist before the world was created, and that it (the Name) cannot be anything but God Himself. Among other things, this was thought to mean that knowledge of the secret name of God alone allows one to perform miracles. A similar concept exists in Jewish Kabbalah and in Buddhism.

The main proponent on Mount Athos of the Name-Worshipping Heresy was Hieromonk Anthony Bulatovich, who published a few books on the subject. The opponents of the Name-Worshipping Heresy, the other Athonite monks, considered this teaching to be pantheism and incompatible with Christianity. They argued that, before the Creation, God did not need this name so the name was created and is actually an empty sound having no mystical attributes in and of itself.

In Russia, the most vocal opponent was Archbishop Antony (Khrapovitsky) of Kiev. In 1912, by decision of the Holy Synod, Hilarion's book was forbidden in Russia. In September 1912, the Name-Worshipping Heresy was condemned by Patriarch Joachim III of Constantinople and in February 1913 it was proclaimed to be pantheism by Patriarch Germanus V of Constantinople. The heresy was also condemned by the Russian Holy Synod in 1913 and by Patriarch Gregory of Antioch. The well-known Father Cherubim was one of the most vocal opponents of this teaching on Mount Athos.

In October 1918 the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church no longer allowed Name-Worshippers to participate in church services unless they repented. The decision was signed by the Patriarch of Moscow, Saint Tikhon. In its decision the Holy Synod stated that: Hieroschemamonk Anthony was not allowed to serve as long as: he continues to disobey Church authority and spread his musings which have been condemned by the Church hierarchy to the harm of the Church.

The heresy was continued in Paris where the proponents of the heresy of Sophia, Florensky and Bulgakov also supported the Name-Worshipping heresy. Hilarion's book was reprinted in 1998 and today the leading advocate of this blasphemy is the deposed Russian Bishop Gregory Lourie, who recently was allowed to receive Holy Communion at the Holy Transfiguration Monastery in Brookline, Massachusetts. Archbishop Hilarion Alfeyev, an advocate of the Awake Sleeper Heresy, wrote in 1999: Even though the movement of the 'Name-worshippers' was crushed at the beginning of the century on the orders of the Holy Synod, discussion of the matter regained impetus in the years preceding the Moscow Council (1917–18) ... Thus the Church's final assessment of 'Name-worshipping' remains an open question to this day.
This heresy has attracted certain clergy and laity who consider themselves intellectuals. It is being resurrected in order to lead many away from the Faith of the Gospels and the Holy Church.

Bishop Photios of Marathon recently submitted an introductory study to our Holy Synod concerning this heresy: http://www.hotca.org/orthodoxy/theologi ... orshipping

In Christ,
+Fr. Panagiotes

My former confessor in GOARCH was a spiritual son of Elder Ephraim, so he attended priestly retreats at the Ephramite monasteries whenever they were offered. At a Bible study, he mentioned that these Ephramite monks have a tradition of going outside (when the weather permits) around midnight and forming a circle under the moon and/or stars. Then they start chanting the Jesus Prayer. This priest told us that it was an awesome religious experience, one that he relished and would not miss. Yes, the weather was often cold, but this prayer experience was very invigorating.

Is this part of the ancient monastic tradition?

Or is this part of ΤΗΕ ΝΑΜΕ-WORSHIPING HERESY?

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

User avatar
nun.xenia
Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon 16 August 2010 3:28 pm
Jurisdiction: Hierarchial Conference of ROAC
Location: Russia
Contact:

Re: The Name-Worshiping Heresy vs Monastic practice

Post by nun.xenia »

Is this part of the ancient monastic tradition?

No, it is not. The Jesus prayer is to be done in inner isolation, not by some collective chanting. The services of the Divine office are for the collective chanting, not the Jesus Prayer.

I can recommend you this interesting book of the history of the Jesus Prayer:

Or is this part of ΤΗΕ ΝΑΜΕ-WORSHIPING HERESY?

No, it is not either. What you call "ΤΗΕ ΝΑΜΕ-WORSHIPING" does not imply any worshiping rites nor anything of that kind.

nun Xenia

JHunt777
Newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue 12 May 2009 4:47 am
Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: ROCOR

Re: The Name-Worshiping Heresy vs Monastic practice

Post by JHunt777 »

nun.xenia wrote:

> Is this part of the ancient monastic tradition?

No, it is not. The Jesus prayer is to be done in inner isolation, not by some collective chanting. The services of the Divine office are for the collective chanting, not the Jesus Prayer.

It is not at all uncommon historically, particularly but not exclusively in the poorer sketes of Mt. Athos and elsewhere where literacy or access to all of the necessary service books might be a problem, for the services to be substituted with the collective saying of the Jesus Prayer in church. In the West, the monastery of St. John the Baptist in Essex, founded by Fr. Sophrony the disciple of St. Silouan of Mt. Athos, is particularly well known for continuing this tradition. Every day the fathers at the monastery gather in church to say the Jesus Prayer for about 2.5 hrs every morning and 2.5 hrs every evening. This collective repetition does not substitute for the private, solitary, and continual repetition of the Jesus Prayer. While this is a practice perhaps more common in small and poor sketes than it is in larger monasteries that have all of the necessary service books, it is not an aberration from monastic tradition.

User avatar
nun.xenia
Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon 16 August 2010 3:28 pm
Jurisdiction: Hierarchial Conference of ROAC
Location: Russia
Contact:

Re: The Name-Worshiping Heresy vs Monastic practice

Post by nun.xenia »

JHunt777 wrote:
nun.xenia wrote:

> Is this part of the ancient monastic tradition?

No, it is not. The Jesus prayer is to be done in inner isolation, not by some collective chanting. The services of the Divine office are for the collective chanting, not the Jesus Prayer.

It is not at all uncommon historically, particularly but not exclusively in the poorer sketes of Mt. Athos and elsewhere where literacy or access to all of the necessary service books might be a problem, for the services to be substituted with the collective saying of the Jesus Prayer in church. In the West, the monastery of St. John the Baptist in Essex, founded by Fr. Sophrony the disciple of St. Silouan of Mt. Athos, is particularly well known for continuing this tradition. Every day the fathers at the monastery gather in church to say the Jesus Prayer for about 2.5 hrs every morning and 2.5 hrs every evening. This collective repetition does not substitute for the private, solitary, and continual repetition of the Jesus Prayer. While this is a practice perhaps more common in small and poor sketes than it is in larger monasteries that have all of the necessary service books, it is not an aberration from monastic tradition.

Yes, I know about this rule. But what was described by Maria sounds different. They go outdoors around midnihts to chant. Strange. If this is a "Midnight service" (I do not know its name in English), then it can be done without a book, it is possible to remember it by heart. But it looks like as something diffeent, some special rool of that particular monastery (some monasteries have this or that rule of their own).

jgress
Moderator
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu 4 March 2010 1:06 pm
Jurisdiction: GOC/HOTCA

Re: The Name-Worshiping Heresy vs Monastic practice

Post by jgress »

As far as I know the Ephraimite monasteries do not espouse Name-worshipping. Where their particular traditions concerning the Jesus prayer come from is another question.

User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

Re: The Name-Worshiping Heresy vs Monastic practice

Post by Maria »

Thank you for all your responses.

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

Post Reply