jgress wrote:That's what you say, but why should I believe your assertions rather than the assertions of Bp Akakije's supporters? And your arguments in any case rest on the assumption that the Greek GOC is the ultimate arbiter, when the whole point of the Akakijans' case is that the Greek GOC does not have the authority to make these kinds of decisions for Serbia. In any case, basing this whole business on obscure questions of legality shows a radical misunderstanding of the Church.
There is a huge difference between assertions and facts! The Holy Synod through its encyclical speaks with facts.
jgress wrote:Every jurisdiction has broken the rules, but we don't conclude from this that the Church has disappeared. What matters is that the true faith is still being preached and that we believe God continues to send His Spirit down on us, no matter how many rules we break.
We dare anyone to find a single canon that the GOC Synod of Metropolitans has broken on the Serbian matter.
jgress wrote:If I did, and if I lived in Serbia and had to make a choice, I would make a decision based on who I believed would be a genuinely good bishop.
You mean based on your own personal sentimental criteria? If you ask us we can name ten pious and loving and caring and "genuinely good" (whatever this means) "GOC" bishops who are totally uncanonic and their ordination is totally against the Holy Canons!