Hieromonk Ambrose wrote:Suaiden wrote: my bet is that it annoys to no end both you and your student, Fr Aidan, that you can't seem to find out what's going on.
Dear Father Deacon,
Whatever internal processes you have initiated to handle the heresy and the gross ecumenism of the Encyclical is naturally your internal business and who would expect it to be open to outsiders? Why should we be annoyed by a quite correct way of handling problems? Naturally we await with interest the conclusion of your investigation and whether your Church will allow the Metropolitan to continue in office in light of the Encyclical.
[/quote]
Wow. Once you start lying it seems you can't stop. Your only interest is to cause chaos and maximum damage to our Church! We knew all along that certain clergy, when they abandoned the Synod, cited you and Fr Aidan as the reasons they left. Think I don't keep track? Think I haven't made a few claims to you to see how they would "move up the chain"? You play the same game with members of the ROCOR-A, and even fewer of them believe the careful misrepresentations you present ("ROCOR never changed", for example).
You can fool people on the Paradosis list, which is now basically overrun by ROCOR-MP clergy and a few stalwart exceptions, but here? No. We aren't so silly. I'm quite happy to speak here.
But the main point, and one on which Fr Aidan and myself completely agree with you and Father Dcn Augustine is that the Encyclical is heretical.
But you are in communion with those same heretics. So you have no basis to state that you can agree with us. That encyclical is heretical, but we are not in communion with any of you, so whatever happens with us, we are not in communion with the heretics in the letter. You are. So is Father Aidan. And you both know it and can pretend otherwise.
Just more lies.
Suaiden wrote:Besides the false claim that Fr Augustine is counselling Bishops and priests to stop commemorating the Metropolitan.
It is not a false claim, Father Deacon, Here, again,are the words of Fr Hierodeacon Augustine:
Hierodcn Augustine (Fetter):
Now that we have proof of a document, and investigation underway, and until
this is resolved, I'd never go to a Liturgy in which Met. Evloghios name is
commemorated. Nor would any bishop or priest who knows what the situation is
commemorate him. Draw your own conclusion about what that means in American
Archdiocese now.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OrthodoxW ... sage/20367
-oOo-
Again, he corrected himself and said "something will be done". He didn't say what and you can't extrapolate it from an angry first reaction, though you are pretending you can! You don't know what he is doing, what I'm doing, what the Metropolitan or Archbishop John or any of us are doing, you don't know who is being commemorated or what we are doing. And you have no idea what is going on. It's why you are going on any forum you can find to talk about this to keep pressing, perhaps to find someone else who will ask us, not obviously connected with you.
They will get the same answer. And if you do find out, we already know how.
See, I learned a lot from watching Catacombniks in Russia. Specifically, how to guard against KGB agents.
Now stop lying.