Does anyone know the whereabouts of Fr Anthimos (Florian Bichir)?
He had a website TOCRomanian???
Christ is Risen
Thank You
Petros
Moderator: Mark Templet
Does anyone know the whereabouts of Fr Anthimos (Florian Bichir)?
He had a website TOCRomanian???
Christ is Risen
Thank You
Petros
petros_p wrote:Does anyone know the whereabouts of Fr Anthimos (Florian Bichir)?
He had a website TOCRomanian???
Christ is Risen
Thank You
Petros
Inthe same place
Fr. Anthimos
About Anthimos / Florian Bichir are existing many topics - all they are not favorable for him. In the Euphrosynos café can you find:
The real face of "Padre" Anthimos Bichir!
by Theoktisis » Thu 1 November 2007 3:47 pm
The real face of "Padre" (Father) Anthimos (Florian) Bichir.
I am sending this message to all decent and pious Orthodox-folks, in order to be aware that this character, Florian Bichir on his lay-name, is not at all what he is pretenfding to be.
First of all, let us see his „traditionalist" mask:
To: orthodox-tradition@ yahoogroups.com
From: "Fr. Anthimos" padrerom@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [paradosis] New bihops in GOC - Makarios
With delight I inform you that the our H.Synod haves a new Bishop. In the meeting of yesterday elected Bishop for Russia the archimandrite Nektarios Yasouski (for St.Petesburg) as Bishop of Olympou. The area of this whilom diocess is in central Greece (on the foothill of mount Olympos).
Today morning took place his ordination in the cathedral of Athens by H.B. Archbishop Makarios, Metropolitans Kallinikos, Efthimios and Christoforos and Bishop Athanasios.In the liturgy officiated 8 priestes.
At the Saturday the Theofilestatos Nektarios will depart from Russia.
His e-mail is Pantanassa_spb@ mail.ru
http://olympius.livejournal. com/
Lost month, Genuine Ortodox Church of Greece hedet by His Beatitudine Maharios, Archbishop of Athens and all Greece decide to ordain ieromonk Athanasios, like Bishop Athanasios of Gardikiou.
Spiritual father of Bishop Athanasios is His Eminence Metropolitan Kallinikos of Lamia.
Fr. Anthimos BICHIR
Traditional Orthodox Church of Romania
Exarh: H.E.Metropolitan Christophoros
http://www.omologitis.org
under Genuine Orthodox Church of Greece
headed by H.B. Archbishop MAKARIOS
here http://euphrosynoscafe.com/forum/search ... 44&start=7
and here http://euphrosynoscafe.com/forum/search ... thor=padre
So, let us see the other face of this fake Orthodox-Traditionalist.
(You can see photos of his ordination as a GOC-Makarios priest at http://web.archive.org/web/200312260615 ... nation.htm
This site is no longer available, since it was very uncomfortable with his new-calendarist laudative-look! (see below).
It is worthly to be known that on the 17-th of October this year, Bichir released oficially his book, called „Orthodox Polemics", with (!!!) the „blessing" of new-calendarist „metropolitan" Lawrence of Ardeal (from Official Church of Romania), known for his agressive ecumenism and also for his rabid hate against the Tradition! He is, from far, the most progressist „hierarch" from entire new-calendarist synod. Also, the Introductory Chapter of this book was written by prof. Necula Constantin from Theological College „Andrei Saguna" from Sibiu. This Necula has also a bad reputation amidst students (being very ecumenist and filo-papist). (see more about this event here http://ro.altermedia.info/religietradit ... _7809.html )
Let us now see his activity as a religious writer. Florian Bichir is a journalist at „Evenimentul Zilei" newspaper (translated ~ „Daily Event" or „Event-of-the-Day"). Here is the website of the so-called newspaper: www.evz.ro and here you can see almost all his „articles" http://www.hotnews.ro/articole_autor_58 ... -Zilei.htm
I will try to resume in very shortly phrases what this articles are about.
There is one single word describing this: new-calendarist conformatism and laudation of official „hierarchs". He is very mysterious about his cnfession and Calendar, so in Romania nobody knows that he is a GOC-priest. He is also writing about pseudo-Feasts of new-calendarists, as you may see here: http://www.hotnews.ro/articol_12363-Cal ... ecetos.htm , where he is writing about the services held in N-Style churches on 6-th of January (new style calendar, meaning on the false-Epiphany of our Lord, Jesus Christ).
Here, http://www.evz.ro/article.php?artid=318980 , in the article called „Episcocracy and Church-Democracy", Bichir is very happy about the presence of layman in the Supreme Church-Council (new-style). Those layman are politicians and public freemasons!!!
His admiration for Freemasonry goes further, so he consideres necessary that the public image of this antichristic institution should be „ameliorated". So he writes another garbage: „Freemasons fair-trade" http://www.evz.ro/article.php?artid=318018 , making a very short, but friendly history of this occult organization. Here http://www.evz.ro/article.php?artid=326182 he is defending the actual „Patriach" of Romania, Daniel, about not being a freemason, despite the fact that it is well known that he is a Freemason on 33 degree-rank! This fact was revealed in a TV-Show on April 2005, when a public romanian Freemason, Olimpian Ungherea, revealed this occult „confession" of the present Patriach.
Not so long time ago, a masonic ceremony was held in the OrtHODOX Cathedral of Timisoara (it was a Maltese Knigts ceremony of initiation)! Here is a video: http://laurentiudumitru.ro/blog/2007/10 ... timisoara/
On the 31-st of October 2007, he is making a study http://www.evz.ro/article.php?artid=328883 of the first 30 days of patriarchate of Daniel. Resuming, Bichir's laudative appreciations are given towards:
So, Bichir is threatening the Conservatives among new-calendar folks, clearely not agreeing with the ecumenist path of Daniel's doctrine!
Before the ellection of Daniel, it was a time when it seemed that Bartholomew of Ardeal was about to win the patriarchal-throne of Romania. So Bichir wrote a very flattering article about this hierarch (who is traditionalist only in appearence, but in fact he is very determined to impose anti-Orthodox measures and laws). I will give here a single edificative example: http://www.crestinortodox.ro/Mitropolit ... 14742.html „Metrop. Bartholomew wants the unification [between Orthodox and catholics] of Paschal dates" ( my note: by calculating an average date between the pseudo-pascha of Latins and Orthodox Pascha)...!
Bichir is naming Bartholomew „lion of Ardeal" (Ardeal is a province out of 3 of Romanian state, situated in Central and west-central territories among Muntenia (the southern part), and Moldavia (north+N-eastern part). Also, Bartholomew is called „a very proeminent brightning figure".... and, I am quotating: „I [Bichir] was a deffender of Metrop. Bartholomew every time I have considered to be imperious necessary".
What more can I say ? Bartholomew was an oppresive hierarch, sergianist beyond limits, who collaborated with ex-Security of Comunist atheistic State, making „reports" of the true Servants of God, who were imprisoned and tortured if they refused to be colaborationists with antichrists!
Another hyposthasis of Bichir: making freemasonic-illuminati gestures of hands: http://stiri.zoot.ro/FLORIAN-BICHIR-Ono ... 68938.html
And... the „best" for last: kindly describing the [herretical] personality of the deceased Pope John II!
http://web.archive.org/web/200601120135 ... 005_2.html
If you feel like, I will translate more detailed all the above links, so all of you can better understand... what is like the real face of FLORIAN BICHIR, abusively ordained as priest of GOC!
Pictures from his ordination by Bishop Christopher, Metropolitan of Mesogaia Exarch of the Genuine Orthodox Church of Romania:
http://web.archive.org/web/200312260615 ... nation.htm
Archimandrit Nilos wrote:About Anthimos / Florian Bichir are existing many topics - all they are not favorable for him.
Many people write bad thing about another here. But it is not the "truth" necessarily, it just is personal opinions, and even slanders. As for Father Anthimos, I never meet him, but I heard he is a good and traditionalist priest and he deserves respect. In EC, we should allow that clergymen to be only called by their name just like laymen.
Many people write bad thing about another here. But it is not the "truth" necessarily, it just is personal opinions, and even slanders. As for Father Anthimos, I never meet him, but I heard he is a good and traditionalist priest and he deserves respect. In EC, we should allow that clergymen to be only called by their name just like laymen.
Bravo Father! I wish we could realize what our real situation is: we are in this world that is spiritually like the site of an atomic bomb blast. There is so much destruction and the whole landscape is laid waste. God is trying in these last days to find any signs of life to save. He finds a few people well enough to help him dig some of the survivors out of the wreckage, and many people wish to do nothing but find fault with everyone. They say, "Well, he has no medical expertise to help the injured." Rather than rolling up our sleeves and trying to do the best we can, we sit in our wretchedness and point out the injuries of all those who come to help. Yes, I know their are false shepherds out there, but that is not proven over the internet by trying these people in abstention.
My own sins are so great that I shutter to think why God uses me as a priest. I pray with tears that at the end of my life He has compassion on me and says, "Priest Mark, you were mostly useless, but given the situation you managed to serve Me in the decrepit state you were in, I forgive you your shortcomings."
I challenge anyone on here to say as many words in prayer for the souls of someone they deride as they do defaming them on this board.
God help me a sinner.
Fr. Mark Templet
ROAC