I will never read Br. Nathanael's blogs again.

TomS · Post by **TomS** » Mon 27 August 2007 9:09 am

Sean wrote:
Ihttp://911revisited.com/video.html

You are also very gullible.

Christophoros · Post by **Christophoros** » Mon 27 August 2007 3:01 pm

For those who haven't seen "Brother" Nathaniel, here is the self-appointed arbitrator of the truth at his finest.

joasia · Post by **joasia** » Mon 27 August 2007 11:17 pm

More evidence of his mental instability. And he holds the Crucifix during this obvious demonic dance.

Could he be involved with a satanic cult? Either that or he is drunk. Either way, he's not a real monk. He's self-proclaimed as a monk.

Грешник · Post by **Грешник** » Tue 28 August 2007 1:01 am

Could he be involved with a satanic cult?

He is a recognized member of the ROAC. As previously stated his actions are condoned and accepted by the American Diocese of the ROAC. The bishop of the diocese is Nathanael's spiritual father and he has condoned all of his actions with either acceptance of silence.

Either way, he's not a real monk. He's self-proclaimed as a monk.

According to the administration of the ROAC in America Nathanael is a monk in good standing and his blog and actions are condoned and accepted by those that are in charge. Maybe this is a good chance to call those in authority over him to ask questions regarding all of this and their apparent nonchalant reaction to him? Regardless, this is not Orthodoxy... any of it...

Sean · Post by **Sean** » Tue 28 August 2007 9:48 am

TomS wrote:
Sean wrote:
Ihttp://911revisited.com/video.html

You are also very gullible.

And you are also very caustic. Are you an Ecumenist or an agnostic this week?

尼古拉前执事 · Tue 28 August 2007 7:28 pm

Juvenaly wrote:
Could he be involved with a satanic cult?

He is a recognized member of the ROAC. As previously stated his actions are condoned and accepted by the American Diocese of the ROAC. The bishop of the diocese is Nathanael's spiritual father and he has condoned all of his actions with either acceptance of silence.

Either way, he's not a real monk. He's self-proclaimed as a monk.

According to the administration of the ROAC in America Nathanael is a monk in good standing and his blog and actions are condoned and accepted by those that are in charge. Maybe this is a good chance to call those in authority over him to ask questions regarding all of this and their apparent nonchalant reaction to him? Regardless, this is not Orthodoxy... any of it...

Actually he has never been tonsured a monk. He was only a novice at HOCNA's HTM and he was only a novice at Dormition Skete. When a novice leave the monastery he is a novice at, he is simply a layman, although in this case, he is a minor clergyman or lay clergyman, as he is a subdeacon.

I am sure Metropolitan VALENTINE, if he knew, would not approve of his wearing a pectoral cross, a skufiya, and giving blessings as if he was a priest with a blessing cross.

If one wants to know why the bishop he has chose to be under, Vicar Bishop ANDREI of Pavlovskoye allows this behaviour, he can be questioned and called at +1(347)321-4870, faxed at +1(208)730-7551, or emailed ar BishopANDREI@ROACusa.org

Грешник · Post by **Грешник** » Tue 28 August 2007 9:06 pm

Oh I agree, I think things would be different of the Metropolitan knew what was going on, all I was trying to say is that as it seems now all authority has been placed on Bishop Andrei and he seems to do nothing about it and as far as he is concerned he sees nothing wrong with Nathanael's website or actions.