Pravoslavnik wrote: Metropolitan Laurus and the current ROCOR-MP Synod have repaid our decades of American kindness and support with what I have begun to recognize as characteristically Russian ingratitude.
While I agree with much of what you have said, I would quibble with this.
Even Metropolitan Laurus admitted that it was the Russians - the old emigres - who proved intractable and immune to his "psychological plan," as it was translated somewhere.
The newer emigres are soviet people, raised in a Soviet state. I don't know what to call Metropolitan Laurus, as he specifically stated that he did not consider himself part of the Russian emigres.
I would say that those who joined in and advocated the disgrace of May 17 had lost their way and had not well learned what the Russians tried to teach them, including gratitude.
I think you will find that most Russians (as opposed to the Soviets) are very grateful to have made it to America. To those, like Abp Kyrill, who are American born and Jesuit and MP educated, we can only ask how "Russian" they ever were.
That is just my personal outlook and attempt to understand what has happened.
In reality, I don't think it is fair to make broad characterizations as to race or ethnicity or national origin, though it is fair to consider such issues in analyzing events.
I am sure there are good "Soviet" people and bad American people as well as holy people fron the MP and some fairly unholy ones within the ROCOR.
I don't see the ROCOR scandal as due to "Russian ingratitude." That would be too easy.