GOA now tonsuring women as clergy?

Feel free to tell our little section of the Internet why you're right. Forum rules apply.


Post Reply
User avatar
George Australia
Sr Member
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat 17 January 2004 9:26 am
Location: Down Under (Australia, not Hades)

Post by George Australia »

joasia wrote:

I still feel it necessary to wall myself off from the EP and MP.

And I respect your right to make this choice, whether it is an informed choice or not, you still have the right to make it. But this is completely seperate to the issue you raise next:

joasia wrote:

When do we know when the Holy Spirit has withdrawn from the Church of Constantinople?

Why does this question require an answer? If you have walled off from the Ecumenical Patriarchate it is not because you consider it "devoid of Grace". The only reason to "wall off" is to seperate yourself from something which is clearly and unequivocally an heresy in the Church. The question of whether or not it still has Grace is immaterial. You have not "walled off" because the EP is devoid of Grace, but because you believe it is clearly, publically and unquestionably holding and teaching a heresy, and you have undeniable proof of this. I personally have no proof that the Ecumenical Patriarchate is holding and teaching the heresy of Ecumenism. For something to be an heresy, it must be a doctrine, and I see no doctrine that the Ecumenical Patriarchate has taught which is heretical. Praxis is not doctrine. For example, if someone refuses to venerate an Icon of Fr. Seraphim Rose, that does not make them an "Iconoclast". It may simply mean that the person does not consider Fr. Seraphim Rose to be "Venerable" since the Church has not Glorified him yet. The person's praxis looks like the heresy of Iconoclasm, yet it cannot be deduced from his praxis that the person holds and teaches the heretical doctrine of Iconoclasm. In the same way, until the Church clearly teaches the doctrine that all christian denominations form branches of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, then I cannot accuse it of heresy on the basis of the praxis of some of it's Bishops and Priests. And in fact, the Church has made clear statements to the opposite effect (for example, the Thessaloniki Communique" in which the Orthodox delegates to the WCC not only clearly stated that they will not budge on the issue of the Ecclesiology of the Orthodox Church, that she, and she alone is the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, but also forbad the Orthodox delegates from attending any further joint worship in the WCC.)

joasia wrote:

Patriarch Bartholowmew allows con-celebrations with papists. He is openly showing his acceptance of union with them; they are already concelebrating with those who do not "worship the same God" that we do.

"Concelebration" means that two or more priests or bishops offer the Eucharist together. Patriarch Bartholemew has never done this, nor has he ever allowed his clergy to do this.

joasia wrote:

I know of a priest who allows a papist priest con-celebrate in the Holy Altar with him, on Pascha. He says that it is a time of great joy and that it's an act of brotherly love.

Again, are they "concelebrating" or is the heterodox priest merely present?

joasia wrote:

So when is the line drawn and who has the authority to draw it?

The only authority which can draw the line is a pan-Orthodox Synod. This does not mean that we cannot withdraw from Bishops who we consider to be clearly teaching an heresy condemned by the Fathers. But we cannot depose him. Not even a Patriarch has the authority to do that. Only a Synod has this authority. One of the greatest assets the Orthodox Church has is it's Concilliar nature. Are we going to descend into a laissez-faire group where anyone can depose anyone and declare anyone devoid of Grace or anathema? By all means, follow your conscience, but do not presume to anathemise or depose or excommunicate anyone before a Church Synod has.

joasia wrote:

This is the reason why I wonder about the presence of Grace with the EP.

And I hope that I have shown you that this kind of idle curiosity is harmful, and can only lead to schisms. Wait until the Church makes her pronouncement. As I said, the presence or not of Grace in the EP is not the reason you should wall off from it if that is your choice. You don't need this question answered to make your decision.
George

"As long as it depends on Monothelitism, then Miaphysitism is nothing but a variant of Monophysitism."

User avatar
rafael.daher
Jr Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat 28 January 2006 10:59 am

Post by rafael.daher »

Greeks and Ukranians under EP concelebrating with papist bishop, Brazil:

http://www.ecclesia.com.br/galeria/s_ca ... andria.htm

User avatar
rafael.daher
Jr Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat 28 January 2006 10:59 am

Post by rafael.daher »

"Concelebration" means that two or more priests or bishops offer the Eucharist together. Patriarch Bartholemew has never done this, nor has he ever allowed his clergy to do this.

Only to remember: the antiochians in Brazil do that some times. And the Antiochians are in communion with EP.

User avatar
George Australia
Sr Member
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat 17 January 2004 9:26 am
Location: Down Under (Australia, not Hades)

Post by George Australia »

rafael.daher wrote:

Greeks and Ukranians under EP concelebrating with papist bishop, Brazil:

I'm afraid the link you provided does not show that. The link you provided was to photos of the veneration of the relics of St. Catherine of Sinai, not a Eucharist. Perhaps you meant to post a different link? You obviously understand what "concelebration" means because you quote me below:

rafael.daher wrote:

"Concelebration" means that two or more priests or bishops offer the Eucharist together. Patriarch Bartholemew has never done this, nor has he ever allowed his clergy to do this.

Only to remember: the antiochians in Brazil do that some times. And the Antiochians are in communion with EP.

Only to remember: you need to provide proof for your accusations. Typing something into a bulliten Board does not constitute "proof". So prove to me that the Antiochians concelebrate the Eucharist with Roman Catholics in Brazil, or repent of breaking the 9th Commandment of the Decalogue. There is no such thing as slander in the name of Christ. All slander is satanic in origin.

"As long as it depends on Monothelitism, then Miaphysitism is nothing but a variant of Monophysitism."

User avatar
rafael.daher
Jr Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat 28 January 2006 10:59 am

Post by rafael.daher »

Dear George,

George Australia wrote:

The link you provided was to photos of the veneration of the relics of St. Catherine of Sinai, not a Eucharist. Perhaps you meant to post a different link? You obviously understand what "concelebration" means because you quote me below...

A friend who attend this event see the papists eating their white crackers. The greek priest and the ukranian under EP don't commune, but they prayed, sing and blessing the presents. They do one prayer together to "bless" the chapel and the relichs, and after all, the roman catholics give the white crackers to the presents. This is not on the pictures, because the Orthodox priests don't "eat" those crackers (the same that the papists call of "body of Christ"). Celebrate one blessing with heretics is not concelebrate with heretics?

Only to remember: you need to provide proof for your accusations. Typing something into a bulliten Board does not constitute "proof". So prove to me that the Antiochians concelebrate the Eucharist with Roman Catholics in Brazil, or repent of breaking the 9th Commandment of the Decalogue. There is no such thing as slander in the name of Christ. All slander is satanic in origin.

I don't have the pictures here, but, if is the problem to you, i can take it on the next times when the antiochian Brazilian bishop invited the roman catholic cardenal Don Claudio Hummes to sit on his cathedra in the Antiochian Cathedral, while one jesuist priest help in the altar during Liturgy. This is not so difficult. Happily, i dont attend this cathedral, but when this things will happen, i will take pictures to you. This happen in 2005, 2006 and problaly will happen on 2007.

I see that you like to see bizarre things, so, watch this Liturgy:

http://www.badongo.net/vid/114052

One orthodox liturgy in Curitiba, Brazil, with two girls helping in the altar.

Make this proofs is not so difficult to me. Don't call me lyier, just wait a litle. Bizarre things like that ever happen on the Antiochian Church in Brazil. Oportunites will never lack :mrgreen:

User avatar
rafael.daher
Jr Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat 28 January 2006 10:59 am

Post by rafael.daher »

Justo to remember: ROCOR here don't give communion to antiochians. :D

User avatar
joasia
Protoposter
Posts: 1858
Joined: Tue 29 June 2004 7:19 pm
Jurisdiction: RTOC
Location: Montreal

Post by joasia »

What I see with the EP's activities is that they are focused on an inter-religious communication. Now, people may say...what's wrong with that? Well, my question is...what's wrong with teaching Orthodoxy to the other religions?? Afterall, if they are hierarchs of the Apostolic succession, then they hold the true faith passed down from them. So why are they walking on eggshells to be so compliant to other religions that are heretical?

Why aren't they there as the voice of Orthodoxy telling the other religions that they should come to the True Church of Christ to worship in the true faith...basically, to tell them that they are wrong in their "religions". What did the Orthodox saints live and die for anyways?

Instead, Bartholowmew is preparing to sign for a union with the papists...to denounce the Orthodox truth and allow papist innovations to infect the Orthodox Church. We need a St. Mark of Ephesus, in our times.

Joanna

Create in me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me. (Ps. 50)

Post Reply