Bartholomew Denounces Moscow's "3rd Rome" Theory

Feel free to tell our little section of the Internet why you're right. Forum rules apply.


Post Reply
User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Bartholomew Denounces Moscow's "3rd Rome" Theory

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

"ORTHODOXOS TYPOS": Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Denounces Moscow's "3rd Rome" Theory

According to the Athens newspaper To Vima of 8 July 2004, Ecumenical
Patriarch Bartholomew responded to the "3rd Rome" theory of the
Patriarch of Moscow (which had been brought up for discussion during
the 8th International Assemblage of the Russian Orthodox Church) by
calling it "...foolish, hubristic, and blasphemous," because "...it
resounds with the spirit of caesarpapism and vaticanism; something
totally unacceptable to the Orthodox Church."

To Vima went on to report that the Ecumenical Patriarch replied
specifically to the positions and arguments posited by the attending
Church hierarchy and political representatives of Moscow by sending --
via the Secretary of the Assemblage -- letters pertaining to this
matter to the Patriarch of Moscow, Alexion; the President of External
Affairs for the Russian Church, Metropolitan of Smolensk, Cyril; as
well as to some of the politicians in attendance. Along with other
matters, the letter contained the following:

To the representatives of the Russian government, Patriarch Bartholomew stated: "The gathering together of Orthodox faithful into one flock under the leadership of a single powerful leader, who would be carrying out the agenda of a particular government, will unavoidably lead the Church into becoming nothing more than an organ of that government, and not the means by which mankind achieves salvation."

To the Minister of the Exterior, Ivanoff, he stated the following: "The
involvement of government into the decision-making process of the
Church smacks of unacceptable caesarpapism. During the communist era
there occurred an intolerable politicization of the Russian Church. ...
We hoped that things would be different after the fall of that
monstrous system. However, to our dismay, we see that the current
Russian government continues to unhesitatingly interfere, and, indeed,
to even 'make policy' concerning matters that are strictly
ecclesiastical."

The Patriarch went on to ask the following question of the Metropolitan
of Smolensk: "Are you telling us that the unity of Orthodoxy is a
question of numbers, political strength, secular and diplomatic power?"
According to the article in To Vima, the Ecumenical Patriarch went on
to declare: "What we have heard regarding the unity of the Church is,
in its entirety, an unfortunate echoing of the spirit of vaticanism,
which construes unity as a single organizational structure, as opposed
to the unity of the spirit and of the heart, which has been the way it
has always been construed in the Orthodox Church."

To the Vice President of the Parliamentary Committee, the Ecumenical
Patriarch emphasized the following: "The foolish theory pertaining to a
'3rd Rome' is hubristic (in accordance with the ancient Greek
definition of this word [having to do with overweening arrogance] ),
and blasphemous. New Rome may be the first among equal Patriarchates, but she has never sought to dominate and exercise power over the other Orthodox Churches. We recognize her primacy in the stewardship of our unity, and she has performed this function humbly and absent any exercise of power."

Finally, as reported in the To Vima article, the Ecumenical Patriarch,
wanting to send a clear and unambiguous message to all Orthodox
faithful everywhere, stated: "Those who speak of a 3rd Rome are totally
unsuited to hold leadership positions in the Orthodox Church, because
they will play a role in transforming her from a Christ-worshipping
faith to a feudalistic organization based upon the exercise of raw
power."

On the other side of this issue, the official representative of the
Russian government, Vladimir Zorin, spoke of the need to unite all of
the Orthodox nations "...under the banner of the Russian Church, which
is the largest, and, as such, holds the leadership position among the
Orthodox Churches."

Russian Minister of the Exterior, Igor Ivanoff, stated: "Our diplomatic
service cooperates and works with the Russian Orthodox Church, which
represents the connecting link between all of the Slavic Orthodox
Churches."

The Metropolitan of Smolensk, Cyril, stated unequivocally that: "The
Russian Orthodox Church holds the de facto first place among all of the
other Orthodox Churches because of her great spirituality, her ethics
and virtues, her tradition, and her political influence; as such, she
speaks for the over 350 million Russians throughout the world.
Moreover, she exercises influence in all of the Orthodox Churches of
the Balkans, as well as in those countries where the Orthodox faithful
represent a minority. We are the rightful spiritual heirs of
Byzantium."

The Vice-President of the Parliamentary Committee declared that the
Russian Orthodox Church was "...the only one able to lead a
Pan-Orthodox unity of a multinational character. For that reason, the
3rd Orthodox Capital prophesied by Saint Seraphim of Sarof is needed.
We must adhere to the historical necessity of founding a '3rd Rome.' "
The Metropolitan of Minsk, Philaretos, argued that: "The Church of
Constantinople was the Church of the Byzantine Empire, and her role
within Orthodoxy has diminished as a result of the termination of that
Empire; this has resulted in the Ecumenical Patriarchate becoming
increasingly animated by papist tendencies."

Finally, the representative of the Metropolitan of Odessa, Milan
Gerkas, declared: "We are the leaders of Orthodoxy, and we have to
demonstrate that fact."

http://grecoreport.com/Bartholomew_Denounces.htm
Orthodoxos Typos. 16 July 2004. p. 6.
(Translation by GRECO REPORT staff.)

User avatar
ioannis
Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri 22 July 2005 9:38 am

Post by ioannis »

"3rd Rome", as in, 3rd Vatican - there is no competetion with Istanbul in this regard.

User avatar
Priest Siluan
Moderator
Posts: 1939
Joined: Wed 29 September 2004 7:53 pm
Faith: Russian Orthodox
Jurisdiction: RTOC
Location: Argentina
Contact:

Post by Priest Siluan »

ioannis wrote:

"3rd Rome", as in, 3rd Vatican - there is no competetion with Istanbul in this regard.

Good point!

User avatar
jacqueline
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat 5 March 2005 2:28 am
Faith: RussianOrthodox
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by jacqueline »

Interesting thread on Russia as the 3rd Rome

http://thefinalphaseforum.invisionzone. ... /t875.html

"Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and today, and for ever." ( Heb.13:8 )

Post Reply