CGW wrote:ICONOPHILI wrote:1. It doesn't take hundreds of thousands, just the top learders, of the Military and Government, (The simple fact I have to explain this shows you CAN be lead to believe "FANTASTIC LIES" http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4525
Let's go to the link:
The photos below from a Closed Circuit Television Camera in the Pentagon's parking area show something impact against the Pentagon�s walls on 9/11 2001. However, as can be seen these images show absolutely no sign of American Airlines Flight 77.
In other words it could have been caused by anything, even a missile.Now, back to a message I posted six days ago:
Let's go to the eyewitnesses for a minute. One of the things one might notice on these conspiracy sites is that the same small set of pictures and statements appears over and over. One might think that only a few people saw the Pentagon plane, for instance.
So we go to an official government response to one of the conspiracy theorists. Near the bottom of the page is a list of twenty-five or so eyewitness statements. The plane is identified as an American Airlines jet in all but a handful of these. The two people who identified it as a commuter plane were at considerable distances, and the "cruise missile" identification was cherry-picked out of Mike Walter's account, in which he specifically identifies the plane as an American Airlines jet. Moreover, the remains found at the accident site tally with the passenger roster of Flight 77.
The truth is that nobody has to rely upon a security camera taking pcitures at one second intervals (I watched the "film", Iconophili, and about all it's good enough for is to show that something hit the pentagon). There were dozens of eyewitnesses who testified to fact of an airliner. You already know this, yet you just keep repeating the same old stuff. When I refute something you've claimed (the witnesses, the absence of the commission report on-line) you don't even have the Christian decency to admit your sins.
This is worthwhile for me when it leads me to new sources of evidence and the like. But when you just reuse old garbage, you're not worth anyone's time.
HOW am I wrong, 1. What I was stating was that the Gov never explained on T.V. or in "The 9/11 Comission Report" how, the "Supposed" terrorists managed to fly, the 757/767's when they trained to fly "Cessnas" not 757's, I stated that I couldn't find "The 9/11 Comission Report" on the net, looks like it can be found, that doesn't proove that, in the book, (Like I said before) The Gov explained 1.How the "supposed" terrorists flew the 757/767's, 2. How the Cell phones worlked at 25,000/30,000 feet? SO you didn't proove nothing, now go to page 8 in the "Iconophili's Great Big Thread of Conspiracies" Section look at my Feb 22, 2006 Post Notice who I posted that site that showd the Pebntagon Video Crash, look before the Gov showed it, Yesterday 05/16/06 was the first time the Gov showed it, notice the site I posted had it before, now 1. Also that site says that, what went into the Pentagon could have been a large cruise missile that was designed to look like a small version of a 767, but it was not a real 767 that went into the Pentagon, so maybe it was a Cruise missile that the Gov designed to look like a 767, and what half of the Eye witnesses saw was that, the other half of those "supposed" eye witnesses I believe are Gov agents told to say the saw a 767 going into the Pentagon. Go and look at my 02/22/06 post on page 8 so you'll see I'm not lying I did post that. SO ALL IN ALL 1. You haven't shown in the "9/11 Comission Report" that the Gov DID exlain how they mannaged to fly the planes, AND 2. Who did the Cell phone work at 25,000/30,000 feet??