Iconophili's Great Big Thread of Conspiracies!

The resting place of threads that were very valid in 2004, but not so much in 2024. Basically this is a giant historical archive.


Locked
ICONOPHILI
Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon 28 November 2005 2:52 am

Re: CNN-SchmeeNN

Post by ICONOPHILI »

Ebor wrote:
ICONOPHILI wrote:

I will give you quotes and I never said Fr. Seraphim was a Authority, I said the writtings of the Father's are the Authority, all he (Father Seraphim) did was Compily what the Father's wrote...

Well, you would seem to be thinking that his citations or collecting of the various writings and using them to support his assertions in that book are correct. So that is claiming him as some kind of authority.

I clearly posted this in my Previous post when I talked about it, but AGAIN you seem to AGAIN post here as if I didn't write that, hmmmm ARE YOU A DIS-INFORMATIONALIST????????????????????????????????? :? :? :? :?

Perhaps your intent in your posts are clear to you. Others may not find them so.

A "disinformationalist"? Is that better then a "heathen"? Sorry, I'm not sure just what that might be, but no, I don't think I am one of those.

Ebor

What is it he (Father Seraphim) is asserting??

User avatar
George Australia
Sr Member
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat 17 January 2004 9:26 am
Location: Down Under (Australia, not Hades)

Post by George Australia »

ICONOPHILI wrote:

I'm an American.
Your {sp: "You're"} not Hurting {gramm: incorrect use of capital} my feelings, {gramm: full-stop, new sentence} don't {gramm: capital "D"} worry.

:) Despite what you may think, ICONOPHILI, I don't think anyone here is trying to hurt your feelings. I think they are trying to reach out to you with Christian Love, despite the fact that you have been rude, agressive and hurtful towards them (e.g. calling them "heathens").

"As long as it depends on Monothelitism, then Miaphysitism is nothing but a variant of Monophysitism."

ICONOPHILI
Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon 28 November 2005 2:52 am

Post by ICONOPHILI »

George Australia wrote:
ICONOPHILI wrote:

I'm an American.
Your {sp: "You're"} not Hurting {gramm: incorrect use of capital} my feelings, {gramm: full-stop, new sentence} don't {gramm: capital "D"} worry.

:) Despite what you may think, ICONOPHILI, I don't think anyone here is trying to hurt your feelings. I think they are trying to reach out to you with Christian Love, despite the fact that you have been rude, agressive and hurtful towards them (e.g. calling them "heathens").

Thak you for CAREING, but I'm not hurt, even if they ment to hurt me, I'm soo HARDEN HEARTED what they say is child's play to me. BTW What I called Ebor is 100% CORRECT!!

Last edited by ICONOPHILI on Sat 25 February 2006 1:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
ICONOPHILI
Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon 28 November 2005 2:52 am

Post by ICONOPHILI »

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

User avatar
George Australia
Sr Member
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat 17 January 2004 9:26 am
Location: Down Under (Australia, not Hades)

Post by George Australia »

ICONOPHILI wrote:

Thak {sp: "Thank"} you for CAREING,{sp: "CARING", gramm: redundant capitals} but I'm not hurt, even if they ment {sp:"meant"}to hurt me, I'm soo {sp: "so"}HARDEN HEARTED {sp: "hard hearted", gramm: reduntant capitals; gramm: missing word: "that"}what they say is child's play to me. BTW What I called Ebor is 100% CORRECT!!{factual error: Ebor's confession is heterodox, not "heathen" according to the Orthodox Church, so what you said is "100% incorrect"; gramm: redundant capitals; gramm: repeated punctuation marks}

"As long as it depends on Monothelitism, then Miaphysitism is nothing but a variant of Monophysitism."

ICONOPHILI
Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon 28 November 2005 2:52 am

Post by ICONOPHILI »

George Australia wrote:
ICONOPHILI wrote:

Thak {sp: "Thank"} you for CAREING,{sp: "CARING", gramm: redundant capitals} but I'm not hurt, even if they ment {sp:"meant"}to hurt me, I'm soo {sp: "so"}HARDEN HEARTED {sp: "hard hearted", gramm: reduntant capitals; gramm: missing word: "that"}what they say is child's play to me. BTW What I called Ebor is 100% CORRECT!!{factual error: Ebor's confession is heterodox, not "heathen" according to the Orthodox Church, so what you said is "100% incorrect"; gramm: redundant capitals; gramm: repeated punctuation marks}

WRONG 100%, His "Confession" and "What he said" are two different things what he said is PURE Heathenistic, not "Heterdoxic" :mrgreen:

User avatar
George Australia
Sr Member
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat 17 January 2004 9:26 am
Location: Down Under (Australia, not Hades)

Post by George Australia »

ICONOPHILI wrote:

WRONG 100%, His "Confession" and "What he said" are two different things {factual error: "confession" is a "statement of belief"} what he said is PURE Heathenistic,{gramm: no such word} not "Heterdoxic" {gramm: no such word}

"As long as it depends on Monothelitism, then Miaphysitism is nothing but a variant of Monophysitism."

Locked