As a doctor, you must be familiar with the word "research". The problem with Nathaniel/Milton's "news reports" is that none of his information is researched. His "facts" are nothing but rumor and hearsay with a ROAC slant. If Nathaniel would like to talk all day and night about the MP/ROCOR ordeal (why it interests him, I haven't a clue since he's never been a member of either), that's fine with me. But please, for the love of common sense, back up your position with researched facts not conjecture and rumor. Despite Deacon Basil's good intentions, how does he know the percentages in Austrlia? Despite whatever your intentions might be, Dr. Alajaji, how do you have ANY idea why Protopriest Alexander Lebedeff has decided to go to Australia? Despite Nathaniel/Milton's supposed knowledge of a supposed conversation that took place in a park supposedly involving Archbishop Mark of Berlin, in reality he has no idea what transpired or if the supposed "famous walk"(as he puts it) ever even took place. Until you know, BE QUIET ABOUT IT because you're acting like old crotchity women sitting around a sewing circle gossiping about the neighbors you're not even friends with.
If you have an idea, how about trying this format for presentation.
1.) My idea about a topic
2.) Other people's ideas about the same topic
3.)FACTUAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT MY CLAIM(please refer to a dictionary for clarity on the words FACTUAL and EVIDENCE, they're key here)
4.)FACTUAL EVIDENCE(no need to be redundant, but umm...well...look in the dictionary again) to refute other claims.
5.)A nice, tightly wrapped conclusion.
