This sounds incredible, does anyone know if it is authentic?
Keizer tells a fascinating story about how the Russian Orthodox line of succession became available to the American Catholic Church. Henry Joseph Kleefisch, an American, was fleeing Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution in 1918, and found himself in the company of Archbishop Sergius (later Patriarch of Russia) and two other Orthodox bishops, Raban Ortinski and Theophilus. The four men were stopped by revolutionaries and imprisoned for summary execution. Since Kleefisch was an American, however, they were told that he could go free.
Realizing that their execution would literally end the Russian Orthodox Apostolic Succession, Archbishop Sergius asked to be given half an hour of prayer with his bishops and Mr. Kleefisch (who was soon to be released). When they were alone, the Archbishop explained the situation and begged Kleefisch to accept the burden of the episcopacy, with the trust that he would later transmit it to a properly constituted Archbishop for the Russian Orthodox Christians.
Stunned by the gravity of the trust, Kleefisch accepted and was consecrated under the Canon of Necessity at Harbin, Siberia. Shortly thereafter he was released and returned to Europe. Meanwhile, however, the Bolsheviks had decided to release the Archbishop and his companions, and the Russian Church was saved.
When Kleefisch later came to understand the importance of his commission, he willingly shared the line for the sake of future unity among the churches. In 1945, Archbishop Lowell Wadle of the American Catholic Church obtained the Russian Orthodox succession from Bishop Kleefisch. By that time, Archbishop Wadle had already obtained the Vilatte lines (Malankara Orthodox, Syrian Malabar, and Jacobite Antiochean) from Bishops Boyle and Clarkson, and the Syrian/Melchite Uniate and Byzantine Uniat lines from Archbishop Aneed, who was in Communion with Rome. He also obtained the Old Catholic line of Bishops Mathew, De Landas, and Francis from Bishops Verostek and Cooper. Finally, in 1957 he travelled to England and obtained the sixteen lines of Mar Georgius I.
Two of the bishops who consecrated Bishop Bowman in 1996 were in the direct line of Archbishops Wadle and Aneed. One of them, William Donovan, was at that time the Primate of the American Catholic Church. Two other consecrators, Bishops Lima and McCormick, are in the Old Catholic line of Vilatte, Mathew, De Landas, and Carfora. Bishop Bowman’s fifth consecrator, Bishop John Reeves, is in the Vilatte line and also has a succession from Bishop Costa of Brazil, a Roman Catholic bishop who broke with Rome in 1960.
It sometimes seems that bishops in the independent Catholic movement are obsessed with their "pedigree." But there is good reason for that. For one thing, our validity is often challenged by clerics who have never heard of the Old Catholic Church and assume that we are self-appointed. Secondly, many of us in the Independent Catholic Movement are attempting to bring a measure of unity to the Body of Christ. Mutual recognition of the validity of Orders and sacraments is critical to that unity.
