romiosini wrote:Yes indeed. But the idiot, was directed to Athenagoras of sad memory.
You go too far. Perhaps "misguided" would be a better term?
romiosini wrote:Yes indeed. But the idiot, was directed to Athenagoras of sad memory.
You go too far. Perhaps "misguided" would be a better term?
----------------------------------------------------
They say that I am bad news. They say "Stay Away."
You only know what you have read. And probably from only those sources that already had formed an opinion. None of us are perfect and he held a very difficult poistion.
----------------------------------------------------
They say that I am bad news. They say "Stay Away."
romiosini,
I understand. But anyone who writes or otherwise communicates, whether it be a book, a post, or a phone conversation, must reply on trust, reputation, or cited resource material when making statements of fact. Trust and reputation is earned, and since I don't know you, all I have is to ask for some/any kind of verifiable fact to back up your claim.
And since I have seen heaps of one-liners from ecumenists, including one monk who recently was able to sqeeze in a stupid remark about zealots in an otherwise perfectly good sentence, I am rather eager to start requiring some substance to all these disparaging and useless remarks.
So please, if you want to make a claim about our priests saying another human being is actually a demon (not demon-possesed, but actually a demon) I think you should at least be able to state the name of the priests that said this; a resonable request I think.