Here are a few excerpts from an article:
One of the main arguments of the opponents of the canonization of the Tsar Family is the assertion that the death of Emperor Nicholas II and his Family cannot be acknowledged as martyrdom in Christ's name. The Commission, basing on the thorough consideration of the circumstances of the death of the Tsar Family suggests that they should be canonized as Saint strastoterptsy. In the liturgical literature and in Lives of Saints of the Russian Orthodox Church the word 'strastoterpets' is applied to those Russian Saints who, emulating Christ, humbly and with patience endured physical and moral sufferings and death at the hands of their political adversaries. The examples of strastoterptsy in Russian history were Saint Dukes Boris and Gleb (+1015), Igor of Chernigov (+1147), Andrei of Bogolubovo (+1174), Mikhail of Tver (1319) and Tsarevich Dimitry (+1591). All of them by their feat of strastoterpchestvo gave the lofty example of Christian morality and patience.
The Emperor unfailingly attended to the needs of the Orthodox Church, generously donating money for the construction of new churches in Russia and abroad as well. During the years of his reign the number of parishes in Russia rose by more than 10 000, more than 250 new monasteries were opened. The Emperor personally took part in the laying the first stone of new churches and in other Church festivities.
Deep piety singled out the Royal couple among the aristocracy of that time. The upbringing of the children of the Royal dynasty was imbued with religious spirit. All its members lived according to traditions of Orthodox piety. Going to Church on Sundays and every Church feast, fasting was an essential part of their life. The personal religiousness of the Tsar and his wife was not in merely following traditions. The Royal couple visited churches and monasteries during their numerous voyages, worshipped miracle-working icons and Saints' relics, made pilgrimages, as it was in 1903 during the glorification of St.Seraphim of Sarov. Short services in the court churches could not satisfy the Emperor and Empress. They went to the cathedral of St. Theodore in Tsarskoye Selo, where Empress Alexandra prayed before the lectern with liturgical books open and attentively followed the process of the Divine Service.
Devoutness of the Emperor revealed itself in the fact that during the years of his reign there were more saints canonized than during the two preceding centuries, when only 5 Saints had been glorified. At the time of the last reign Theodosius of Chernigov (1896), Venerable Seraphim of Sarov (1903), St. Duchess Anna of Kashino (veneration re-established in 1909), Holy Hierarch Josaph of Belgorod (1911), Holy Hierarch Germogen of Moscow (1913), Holy Hierarch Pitirim of Tambov (1914) and Holy Hierarch John of Tobolsk (1916) were canonized. And the Emperor had to show particular persistence in trying to achieve the decision of canonization of Venerable Seraphim of Sarov, Holy Hierarchs Josaph of Belgorod and John of Tobolsk. Nicholas II highly revered St. Righteous Father John of Kronstadt. After his beatific decease the Tsar ordered nation-wide commemoration of the departed on the day of his death.
As a politician and State figure the Tsar acted on his religious and moral principles. One of the most common arguments against the canonization of Emperor Nicholas II are the events of 9 January 1905 in Saint-Petersburg. In the historical note of the Commission concerning this question it is explained: Having read on January 8th Gapon's petition, which had the character of a revolutionary ultimatum not allowing to start constructive negotiations with the representatives of the workers, the Tsar had ignored this document, illegal in its form and undermining the authority of the State power, which was unstable under war conditions as it was. During the whole day of January 9th the Tsar hadn't taken any decisions directed at the suppression of the mass demonstrations of the workers. It was the Commander-in-Chief of St. Petersburg who gave the order to open fire to the troops. Historical evidence doesn't allow us to suggest that there was conscious evil will in the activity of the Tsar, which was turned against the people and was embodied in concrete sinful actions and decisions.
From the beginning of the First World War the Tsar regularly went to the Headquarters, visits the military units of the front-line forces, aid-posts, military hospitals, munitions, in short, everything that played a role in this war. The Empress devoted herself to the wounded from the very beginning of the war. Having taken a course in hospital nursing, she together with elder daughters, Grand Duchesses Olga and Tatiana, every day for several hours looked after the wounded in the hospital in Tsarskoye Selo. The Emperor regarded his being the Supreme Commander-in-Chief as performing his moral and State duty before God and the people, at the same time always giving the leading military experts broad initiative in the solution of military-strategic and operational-tactical schemes.
The judgements of Nicholas II as a State figure are extremely contradictory. In discussing this we should never forget, that considering State activity from the Christian point of view we must consider not this or that form of a State order, but the place, which is taken by a concrete person in the State structure. The subject to assessment is how this or that person has managed to embody Christian ideals in their life. We should note that Nicholas II looked upon his monarchic responsibilities as his holy duty.
There were two periods in the life of Emperor Nicholas II - the time of his reign and the time of his confinement. The Commission has attentively studied the last days of the Tsar Family, connected with suffering and martyrdom of its members. Emperor Nicholas often compared his life with the great suffering of Job's, on the day of whose Church commemoration he was born. Having taken his Cross as the Biblical righteous man, he endured all trials steadily, meekly and without a slightest murmur. This very patience was clearly revealed in the last days of the Emperor's life.
From the moment of the abdication it was not the outward events, but rather the inner spiritual state of the Tsar that takes our attention. The Tsar having taken, as it seemed to him, the only right decision, at the same time experienced severe spiritual torment. "If I stand in the way of the happiness of Russia and all the leading social forces ask me to leave the throne and pass it to my brother and son, I'm ready to do this, ready not only the reign, but the whole my life give for my Motherland. I think nobody who knows me can doubt it", - said the Tsar to General D. Dubensky.
"Tsar Emperor Nicholas, having seen so much betrayal around him… retained indestructible belief in God, fatherly love for the Russian people, readiness to lay his life for the honour and glory of his Motherland". On March 8th 1917 the commissars of the Provisional Government having arrived in Mogilev, announced through General Alekseyev about the arrest of the Tsar and necessity to go to Tsarskoye Selo. He addresses his troops for the last time, calling for the fidelity to the Provisional Government, the very one which had subjected him to arrest, appealing for performing one's duty before the Motherland to the completion of victory.
In methodical killing of every member of the Royal dynasty that fell in their hands, the Bolsheviks were first of all guided by ideology because the national view of the Emperor was still as of the Anointed Monarch, and the entire Tsar Family symbolized Russia, which was being destroyed. On July 21st 1918 His Holiness Patriarch Tikhon in his sermon at the Divine Liturgy in Moscow Cathedral of Our Lady of Kazan as if had answered the questions and doubts which after eight decades the Russian Church tries to comprehend: "We know that he (Emperor Nicholas II - M.J.) abdicated from the throne with a view to the good for Russia and because of his love for it."
The Royal Family spent a lot of time reading edifying books, first of all the Holy Scriptures and regularly, almost unfailingly attended Church services. Kindness and peace of mind hadn't left the Empress in this difficult time. The Emperor, being of reserved disposition, felt calm and placid only in close family circle. The Empress didn't enjoy the life of high society.
Moral dissipation, which reigned at the court, was alien to the strict upbringing of the Empress; her religiousness was regarded as oddity, even as hypocrisy. In the letters of Tsarina Alexandra one can see the whole depth of her religious feelings- there is so much strength of spirit, dolefulness about the fate of Russia, faith and hope for the help of God in them. Whoever she wrote to, she found the words of support and compassion. These letters are the real evidence of Christian faith. The prisoners found solace and strength for enduring sorrows in spiritual reading, prayer, divine service, taking Holy Communion.
In the letters of the Tsarina a lot is said about her spiritual life as well as the other members of her Family. "There is a great comfort in prayer: I feel sorry for those who find it unfashionable, unnecessary to pray…" In another letter she writes: "Lord, help to those who can't hold love of God in their embittered hearts, who only see everything bad and don't try to understand that all this will be gone, it can't be other way, Saviour has come and given us a lead. Who follows His way of love and suffering, comprehends all the glory of the Kingdom of Heaven".
The Tsar children meekly and humbly endured all humiliation and sufferings together with the parents. Archpriest Athanasy Belyayev, who confessed the Tsar children, wrote: "The impression [from the confession] was like this: Lord, let every child be so high morally, as the children of the former Tsar. Such gentleness, humbleness, obedience to parental will, full devotedness to God's will, purity in thoughts and total unfamiliarity of the earthly life - passionate and sinful, - wrote he, - amazed me and I was absolutely bewildered: should I, as confessor, remind them of the sins, which were probably not known to them, and how to bring them to repentance in sins which were familiar to them".
In almost complete isolation from the outward world, surrounded by rude and cruel guardians, the prisoners of the Ipatyev's house show remarkable nobleness and lucidity of mind. Their genuine greatness of spirit came not from their monarchical origin, but from extraordinary spiritual height, which they gradually had reached. Together with the Royal Family the servants who followed them in their exile had been shot to death.