ECUMENISM "FINALLY" REJECTED!

Feel free to tell our little section of the Internet why you're right. Forum rules apply.


John Haluska
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu 1 July 2004 6:23 pm

ECUMENISM "FINALLY" REJECTED!

Post by John Haluska »

"In love, we reject Ecumenism, because we desire to offer to the heterodox precisely that which the Lord richly bestowed upon all of us within His Holy Orthodox Church: the opportunity to become members of His Body."

This, among other things, was stressed at the Inter-Orthodox Conference: "Ecumenism: Origins, Expectations, Disenchantment", which was successfully co-sponsored by the Department of Pastoral Theology of the Theological School of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and the "Society of Orthodox Studies" in the midst of large crowds who filled Ceremony Hall at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

The conference took place from September 20-24, 2004. His All-holiness Metropolitan Anthimos of Thessaloniki declared the commencement of the conference. Other Metropolitans and Bishops, the mayor of Thessaloniki, Mr. Panagiotis Psomiadis, Parliament representatives, and university professors were all on hand to offer greetings to the conference and its attendees. Before a packed audience composed of the Abbots of holy monasteries, clergy, monks, and laity, among which were many theologians and students of the Theological School, over a five day period roughly sixty speakers, including Hierarchs, from nearly all of the Local Orthodox Churches, analyzed thoroughly the phenomenon of Ecumenism.

At the conference it was noted that the roughly one hundred year old movement of Ecumenism -- the organized efforts to unite divided Christians -- even if it was, in the beginning of its development, animated by good intentions, has today reached a total dead end – a truth which is confessed by even the most fervent supporters of inter-Christian dialogue. This is due to the way in which these dialogues were established and directed, and are conducted even today.

Inter-Christian dialogues, with their unacceptable joint prayers and their syncretism, quickly led to inter-religious syncretism, the underpinning of which is the new age theory which proclaims that all of the religions are paths which lead to the same God.

Ecumenism, with these dialogues, gatherings and joint prayers, is placed among the so-called New Age, the New Order, and Globalization and serves political and geo-strategic aims, which are especially visible, even to the most uninformed observer, after the eleventh of September, 2001.

The ultimate conclusion of the conference is that the conditions have matured and been met and now render imperative the re-examination of the Orthodox Church participation in the World Council of Churches, and the so-called Ecumenical Movement more generally, as well as inter-religious gatherings.

Joint prayer must be flatly condemned and the Local Orthodox Churches must undertake their heroic exodus from these assemblies.

For this aim to be attained a pan-Orthodox decision is not required, given that he Local Orthodox Churches were incorporated into the W.C.C. and ecumenical movement separately.

Report from the Inter-Orthodox Conference:
Ecumenism: Origins, Expectations, Disenchantment

Press Release

gphadraig
Member
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon 23 August 2004 4:19 pm

Post by gphadraig »

May this message, even at the eleventh hour, be heard and taken to heart by all Local Orthodox Churches, by the mercy of Almighty God...

romiosini

Post by romiosini »

Hey! Has anyone noticed why His Holliness Archbishop Christodoulus of Greece sent an open letter for dialogue of the New Calendar/Old Calendar Issue to all old Calendar Churches? Well Quite obvious, one of the Churches that aren't Ecumenist (compared to other Churches) is Hellas'. Which prooves it, Metropolitan Athimus of Thessalonica is like one of the strongest and closest hierarchs to Archbishop Christodoulus, who can have his voice heard in the Synod of Greece. And also another proof that Serbia isn't Ecumenist is, that Metropolitan Amphilohius (Amfilohije) who is the right hand of His Holliness Patriarch Paul of Serbia, himself openly with the other hierarchs present there declared no to Ecumenism. (Quote, Masters Amphilohius of Montenegro and Artemius of Kosovo are both spiritual sons of Saint Justin Popovich of Serbia! The Father who broke communion with the Serbian Patriarchate and returned once Serbia repented from Ecumenism! If it did then, then it can do it again! Same for most Orthodox churches! Look at the Church of Cyprus. Cyprus is the only that the people can vote the candidates to thrones along with the Synod's voting too. Metropolitan Athanasius former Abbot of the Holy Monastery of Machaeras (the first Icon of the Theotokos) is an Athonite, feared by other hierarchs due to his desire of Return of the Traditions. He is an open Candidate for the Archbishopic Throne due to the sickness of the present Archbishop of Cyprus. You will see, many Fathers will come out and their piety will show with their love for the Church by their stance of Ecumenism!)

John Haluska
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu 1 July 2004 6:23 pm

Post by John Haluska »

http://www.orthodoxnet.gr/conf/ecumenism-en.html

is the place from which the quote that was sent above was taken. Sorry.

John

John Haluska
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu 1 July 2004 6:23 pm

Post by John Haluska »

Apologies:

As far as it is known, the following was/is the first actual rejection of Ecumenism.

"Those who attack the Church of Christ by teaching that Christ's Church is divided into so-called "branches" which differ in doctrine and way of life, or that the Church does not exist visibly, but will be formed in the future when all "branches" or sects or denominations, and even religions will be united into one body; and who do not distinguish the priesthood and mysteries of the Church from those of the heretics, but say that the baptism and eucharist of heretics is effectual for salvation; therefore, to those who knowingly have communion with these aforementioned heretics or who advocate, disseminate, or defend their new heresy of Ecumenism under the pretext of brotherly love or the supposed unification of separated Christians, Anathema!"

John

romiosini

Post by romiosini »

John Haluska wrote:

Apologies:

As far as it is known, the following was/is the first actual rejection of Ecumenism.

"Those who attack the Church of Christ by teaching that Christ's Church is divided into so-called "branches" which differ in doctrine and way of life, or that the Church does not exist visibly, but will be formed in the future when all "branches" or sects or denominations, and even religions will be united into one body; and who do not distinguish the priesthood and mysteries of the Church from those of the heretics, but say that the baptism and eucharist of heretics is effectual for salvation; therefore, to those who knowingly have communion with these aforementioned heretics or who advocate, disseminate, or defend their new heresy of Ecumenism under the pretext of brotherly love or the supposed unification of separated Christians, Anathema!"

Metropolitan Philaret and the rest of the Synod on the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia
John

Through the prayers of Saint Philaret of New York the newly revealed Father of our Church, Lord Jesus Christ have mercy on us and save us!

User avatar
Ephraem
Jr Member
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun 2 May 2004 9:09 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post by Ephraem »

Through the prayers of Saint Philaret of New York the newly revealed Father of our Church, Lord Jesus Christ have mercy on us and save us!

I don't mean to be picky, in an unfriendly way, but I think the term "newly revealed" has a specific meaning in regards to saints (I could be wrong). As I understand it, when either by vision, miracle, or by the discovery of relics, the existence of a saint becomes known, they are referred to as newly revealed. Newly glorified might perhaps be more accurate in the case of St Philaret.

Ephraem
~He who seeth his own sins, seeth not the sins of others.

Post Reply