Palm/Willow/Flowery Sunday - First Day of Holy Week -

Reading from the Old Testament, Holy Gospels, Acts, Epistles and Revelation, our priests' and bishops' sermons, and commentary by the Church Fathers. All Forum Rules apply.


Post Reply
User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Palm/Willow/Flowery Sunday - First Day of Holy Week -

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

Palm Sunday - Entrance into Jerusalem
John 12:1-18
From The Explanation of the Gospel of St. John
by Blessed Theophylact, Archbishop of Ochrid and Bulgaria

1-3. Then Jesus six days before the Pascha came to Bethany, where Lazarus was who had been dead, whom He raised from the dead. There they made Him a supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with Him. Then took Mary a pound of myrrh of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped His feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the fragrance of the myrrh. On the tenth day of the month the Jews take the sheep which will be slaughtered for the Pascha, and from that time they begin the preparations for the feast. Therefore, six days before the Pascha, which is the ninth day of the month, they make a bountiful dinner which they consider a prelude to the feast. Coming to Bethany, Jesus also dines. To emphasize the great miracle of the raising of Lazarus the Evangelist says, Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with Him. Having appeared from the tomb alive, he did not soon return to death, but remained among them a long time, eating, drinking, and living a normal life. By saying that Martha served, the Evangelist indicates that the dinner was in her house. Behold the faith of this woman, who did not permit servants to do the serving, but herself performed this duty. Paul says of the widow who was well reported of for good works, "if she have washed the feet of the saints." [I Tim. 5:10] Martha, then, serves all, but Mary reserves her honor for Christ alone, attending to Him not as a man but as God. She poured out the myrrh and wiped His feet with her hair, not regarding Him a mere man, as did many of the others, but Master and Lord. Maria can be understood allegorically to mean that which leads upwards to the divinity of the Father and Lord [kyrios] of all. For Maria means "mistress ruler" [kyria]. Thus the Ruler of all, the Divinity of the Father, has anointed Jesus' feet, signifying the flesh of the Lord in the last times, namely, God the Word, with the oil of the Spirit. As David says, Wherefore God, Thy God, hath anointed Thee with the oil of gladness. [Ps. 44:6] And the great Peter says, Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. [Acts 2:36] The Flesh, assumed by the Word, and anointed by the divine Spirit Which entered the Virgin's womb, became what the Word is--God. And It filled the world with fragrance, just as the house was filled with the fragrance of Mary's myrrh. What meaning do we see in the hairs which wiped the feet? They represent the saints who the adorn the head of God and His supreme authority. Existing for the glory of God, they may be called His adornment and have become fellow sharers in the anointing of Christ's Flesh. Hence David says [in the Psalm quoted above], more than Thy fellows. And Paul says to the Corinthians, Now He Who establisheth us with you in Christ, and hath anointed us, is God. [I Cor. 1:21] We know that throughout the world those who live according to Christ are called "Christs." (1) Therefore the hairs that wiped Jesus' feet represent Christians, who share in the divine anointing. Just as hair is something dead, so too those who belong to Christ are dead. They have crucified the flesh, mortified their members that are on the earth, and died to the world. [See Gal. 5:24.] Hair is the adornment and glory of the head--the saints are the glory of God, their light shines before men, and the Father is glorified by them. [See Mt. 5:16.] Even their eating and drinking is to the glory of God, Whom they glorify in their members. And for you, O reader, Jesus has also resurrected your fallen mind like another Lazarus, and you have received Him into the house of your soul, and that which is risen feasts together with Him. Therefore anoint the feet of the Lord six days before the Pascha, before the dawning of the Pascha of the age to come, while you still live in this world which was fashioned in six days. The feet of Christ are the Apostle [Book] and the Gospel, in a word, His commandments. By these Christ walks in us. To these commandments bring myrrh, namely, a disposition composed of many virtues, of which the finest is faith as warm and pungent as costly spikenard. If you do not show a fervent, zealous and virtuous bond to Christ's commandments, and wipe them with your mortified members, as with hair, taking them to yourself, you will not be able to make your house fragrant. The Lord's feet are also the least brethren, in whom Christ walks to each man's door asking for what is needed. Anoint these too with the myrrh of almsgiving. There are many who give alms, but make a show of doing so, and thereby gain nothing. For they have their reward in this world. [Mt. 6:2] Wipe the feet [of these brethren] with the hair of your head and receive the benefit in your soul, and gather the reward of almsgiving in that principal and governing part of a man. If there is a part of you that is dead and lifeless, like hair, anoint it with this good chrism. For it is written, "Blot out your sins with almsgiving." [See Dan. 4:24.]

4-8. Then saith one of His disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, who would betray Him, Why was not this myrrh sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor? This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and held the bag, and bare what was put therein. Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of My burying hath she done this. For the poor always ye have with you; but Me ye have not always. Being a lover of money, Judas criticizes Mary's way of showing honor. What he is saying is, "Why did you not offer Him money (so that I could steal it) instead of myrrh?" How can it be that another Evangelist says that all the disciples asked this question? [Mt. 26:8-9] We may say that all the disciples did speak these words, but the others did not share Judas' disposition. The Lord does not rebuke him although He knew that he spoke with a thieving mind. He wished to avoid shaming him, thus teaching us also to be patient and long suffering with such individuals. But in a veiled manner He does chide him for his treachery and willingness to betray Him to death out of love of money. He mentions His burial to wound Judas' unfeeling heart with a pang of conscience, in order to correct him if at all possible. His next words have the same purpose: "the poor always ye have with you; but Me ye have not always, because in a little while I will go away, since you are plotting My death. If I am annoying to you and the honor shown to Me grieves you, wait a short while and you will be free of Me; then you will know if it was indeed for the poor that you needed the sale of the myrrh." If Judas was in fact a lover of money and a thief, why did the Lord give him control of the purse? For the very reason that he was a thief, so that he could not use his love of money as an excuse for his betrayal. He had sufficient consolation for his weakness from handling the purse, but despite this he was not faithful. He bare, which means, carried off and stole, what was put therein, committing sacrilege by taking for himself what had been given for godly purposes. (Let plunderers of sacred things take note whose fate they share.) But the culmination of his wickedness was that he betrayed the Lord. Do you see where love of money leads? To betrayal. Well does Paul call it the root of all evil, since it lead, in this case, to betrayal of the Lord, and in every other instance does exactly the same. [I Tim. 6:10] Some say that Judas was entrusted with the ministry of the funds because it was lower than the other forms of serving. To care for the funds is a lesser ministry than teaching, as the Apostles say in the Book of Acts, It is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables. [Acts 6:2]

9-11. Much people of the Jews therefore knew that He was there: and they came not for Jesus' sake only, but that they might see Lazarus also, whom He had raised from the dead. But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death; because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed in Jesus. These people who came to Jesus showed good sense and judgment, as opposed to those who senselessly raged against Him. For they came, the Evangelist says, not for Jesus' sake only, but that they might see Lazarus also. Indeed, because the miracle was so astounding, many wanted to see the resurrected man, and perhaps hoped to hear something from Lazarus about the others who were with him in hades. But the Pharisees were so inhuman that they desired to kill not only Jesus, but also Lazarus, who had become the cause of salvation for many of the guileless who were lead to faith by means of the miracle worked in him. Thus the Pharisees considered the good he had experienced to be his crime. Above all they were vexed that with the great feast approaching all the people were rushing to Bethany to hear about the miracle and become eyewitnesses of the resurrected man.

12-13. On the next day much people that were come to the feast, when they heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem, took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet Him, and cried, Hosanna: Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord,the King of Israel. Jesus had first withdrawn into the desert for a while to calm the rage of those intent on His murder. Now He enters boldly into the city and appears to all. The time of His Passion is at hand, and He no longer hides, but gives Himself for the salvation of the whole world. Consider the sequence of the Passion. Saving the greatest miracle for last, He raised Lazarus from the dead. As a result many ran to Him and believed. Because many believed, there was greater envy and rage, leading to the plot and the Cross. When the multitude heard that Jesus was coming, they met Him with greater glory and honor than a mere man would deserve. They no longer considered Him merely a prophet, for which prophet had their fathers ever honored in this manner? Thus they also cried out, Hosanna: Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord. From these words we may infer, first, that He is God. For Hosanna means "Save now [sson d]," as it is written in Greek in the 117th Psalm according to the Seventy. There the Hebrew Hosanna is rendered in Greek as O Lord, save now. (2) The power to save is God's alone, and to Him are addressed the words, "Save us, O Lord our God." From many passages one must conclude that Scripture attributes salvation to God alone. First of all, the Psalms of David which refer to Christ say that He is God. Furthermore, they say that He is true God. For it says here, He that cometh, and not, "He that is led." The latter would be the sign of a servant; the former is the sign of power and authority. The words, in the name of the Lord, show the same thing, that He is true God. They do not say that He comes in the name of a servant, but in the name of the Lord. They also reveal that He is not an adversary of God, but one who comes in the name of the Father, as the Lord Himself says, I am come in My Father's name, whereas another shall come in His own name. [Jn. 5:43] And they called Him the King of Israel, as if thinking of a physical kingdom. They were awaiting a king stronger than human nature to be raised up who would save them from the Roman power.

14-16. And Jesus, when He had found a young ass, sat thereon; as it is written, Fear not, daughter of Zion: behold, thy King cometh, sitting on the colt of an ass. These things understood not His disciples at the first: but when Jesus was glorified, then remembered they that these things were written of Him, and that they had done these things unto Him. Why do the other Evangelists [speak of the Lord's instructions to find the young ass] and say, Loose him and bring him hither, while John is silent about this, saying merely, when He had found a young ass? [See Mt. 21:2; Mk. 11:2; and Lk. 19:30.] Do they perhaps disagree? Not at all. What the others said in more detail, John expresses in summary by saying, when He had found a young ass. When the disciples had untied it and brought it to Him, then He found it and sat thereon. In doing so He fulfilled the prophecy of Zechariah who said, Fear not, daughter of Zion: behold, thy King cometh to thee, sitting on the colt of an ass.[See Zech. 9:9.] Because most of the kings of Jerusalem were wicked and tyrannical, the prophet said, "Fear not, O Zion. The king of whom I prophesy to you will not be like the others, but meek and humble, displaying no arrogance whatsoever." This is shown by the fact that He came seated upon an ass. He did not enter the city at the head of an army, but conveyed by a donkey. His sitting upon an ass was also a symbol of things to come. Being unclean according to the law, the ass represents the uncleanliness of the Gentile race, upon whom Jesus, the Word of God, sits, subduing like a colt this insubordinate and uninstructed people, this new race, and leading it into the true Jerusalem once it has been tamed and made obedient to Him. Has the Lord not gathered the Gentiles into heaven, once they became His people and were obedient to His preaching? As for the palms, do they not indicate perhaps that He Who raised Lazarus has become the Victor over death? For palms were awarded to those who were victorious in games and contests. Perhaps they also indicate that He Who is being praised is a heavenly Being Who has come from above. Of all trees it is the palm that appears to soar upwards to the very heavens, so to speak; it bears foliage at the top, and at the peak puts out young white shoots, but the stump and the middle section of the trunk, all the way to top, are rough and hard to climb because of the sharp spines. So it is that he who strives to acquire knowledge of the Son and Word of God will find it a hard and uphill journey because of the toil of gaining virtue. But when he has arrived at the pinnacle of knowledge, he will be met, as if by the whitest palm shoots, by the bright light of divine knowledge and the revelation of ineffable things. Marvel with me, O reader, how the Evangelist is not ashamed, but boldly displays the former ignorance of the Apostles. These things understood not His disciples at the first: but when Jesus was glorified. By glory he means the Lord's Ascension after the Cross and Passion. Only then, by the coming of the Holy Spirit, did they understand that these things were written of Him. That these things were written, perhaps they knew; but that they referred to Jesus, they did not know, and providentially so. They would have been scandalized by His Crucifixion if [they had understood that] Scripture Itself had proclaimed Him King, and then He had suffered these things.

17-18. The people therefore that was with Him when He called Lazarus out of his grave, and raised him from the dead, bare witness. For this cause the people also met Him, for that they heard that He had done this miracle. The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing? Behold, the world is gone after Him. The Evangelist is saying that the people who saw the miracle which He worked for Lazarus were witnesses and heralds of His power. This is why He was met with glory by the people who had heard, that is, believed, that He had done this miracle. If they had not believed, they would not have congregated so swiftly.

  1. "Christ" [Christos] means literally "the Anointed One." For the followers of Christ, instead of the usual word "Christians" [Christianoi] Blessed Theophylact here uses the simple plural form of "Christ," Christoi, to stress the close union between Christ and the members of His mystical Body, the Church.
  1. O Lord, save now; O Lord, send now prosperity. Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord. We have blessed you out of the house of the Lord. God is the Lord and has appeared unto us. Ps. 117:25-26.
Last edited by 尼古拉前执事 on Wed 7 April 2004 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Palm Sunday - First Day of Holy Week

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

Beloved Clergy and Parishioners in the Lord, Grace and Peace be with you.
 
PALM SUNDAY
The Reading is from the Epistle of Saint Paul to the Philippians [§ 247]. Brethren:
     4  4Be rejoicing in the Lord always; again I will say, be rejoicing. 5Let your reasonableness be known to all men. The Lord is near: 6Cease being anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and by entreaty, with giving of thanks, let your requests be made known to God. 7And the peace of God, which surpasseth all understanding, shall guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.
     8For the rest, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are worthy of respect, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are pleasing, whatsoever things are of good report, if there is any virtue and if there is any praise, be considering these things. 9And what ye learned and received and heard and saw in me, these things be practising; and the God of peace shall be with you.
 
The Reading is from the Holy Gospel according to Saint John [§ 41].
     12  1Six days before the passover, Jesus came to Bethany, where Lazarus was who had died, whom He raised from the dead. 2So they made a supper for Him there, and Martha was serving; but Lazarus was one of those reclining at table with Him. 3Then Mary, having taken a pound of very precious perfumed ointment of pure spikenard, anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped His feet with her hair. And the house was filled with the odor of the perfumed ointment. 4Then one of His disciples, Judas Iscariote, Simon's son, who was about to deliver Him up, saith, 5"Why was this perfumed ointment not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor?" 6But he said this, not that he was caring for the poor, but because he was a thief, and had the money box, and was taking away what was put in it. 7Then Jesus said, "Let her alone, for the day of My laying out for burial hath she kept it. 8"For ye have the poor among yourselves always, but Me ye have not always." 9A great crowd of the Jews therefore knew that He was there, and they came not because of Jesus only, but also in order that they might see Lazarus, whom He raised from the dead. 10But the chief priests took counsel that they might put to death Lazarus also, 11because by reason of him many of the Jews were going away and were believing in Jesus.
     12On the morrow a great crowd which came to the feast, after they heard that Jesus was coming into Jerusalem, 13took the palm branches of the palm trees, and went out to meet Him, and were crying, "Hosanna, blessed is He Who cometh in the name of the Lord, the King of Israel [cf. Ps. 117(118):25(26)]." 14And Jesus, having found a young ass, sat upon it, even as it is written: 15"Cease fearing, O daughter of Sion, behold, thy King cometh, sitting on a colt of an ass [cf. Zach. 9:9]." 16But the disciples knew not these things at the first; but when Jesus was glorified, then they remembered that these things were written in reference to Him, and that these things they did to Him. 17Then the crowd that was with Him when He called Lazarus out of the grave and raised him from the dead bore witness. 18On this account the crowd also went to meet Him, because it heard that He had done this sign.
 
     In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.  Amen.
    
THE LAZARUS OF THE PARABLE
AND THE LAZARUS WHO WAS FOUR DAYS IN THE TOMB
By Blessed Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky)
 
     Have you ever noticed, dear reader, that in all of Christ's parables there occurs but one proper name? If you have noticed, have you ever attempted to ascertain why the Lord calls only this Lazarus by name, while even his rival during his earthly sojourn remains under the general title of the Rich Man? Evidently, the Divine Teacher wished His followers to keep firmly in mind both the earthly and the eternal lot of poor Lazarus, although the main idea of the parable is concentrated nonetheless in the person of the Rich Man: Lazarus remains silent in the parable, while the Rich Man speaks and prays for himself and his brethren. The Savior's wish did not go unfulfilled: Lazarus has become a favorite theme in the songs of good Christians! The poor are comforted by such hymns amid their misfortunes, the hearts of the rich are turned from greed thereby, and all are taught to be mindful of death, the judgment of God, and generosity towards the poor. Yet, our problem remains unresolved. The parable of the Prodigal Son is also a favorite topic, if not for folk songs, at least for ecclesiastical hymns, and there are others as well in which mercy and repentance are extolled; but there are no proper names therein. Furthermore, in songs about Lazarus the singers do not draw inspiration from his name, but from the depictions of heaven and hades, the hardheartedness of the Rich Man on earth, and his belated repentance in hades.

     Perhaps we would sooner find what we seek, were we to attempt to elucidate the individual ideas expressed in the Lord's parable. Is everything in it clear? Is our heart reconciled to Abraham's hope-shattering reply to the Rich Man who was bemoaning his brethren: "If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead"?

     These stern words, by the very force of their implications, probably troubled many of the Lord's followers, and to this day continue to trouble many who read the Gospel, for they seem to be an exaggeration until they are confirmed by actual events. And in fact, they were confirmed. Not Lazarus the pauper of the parable, but another Lazarus, the friend of Christ, known to all the Jews, plainly, rose from the dead, before the eyes of a large crowd of people, having spent four days as an unbreathing, malodorous corpse. "Then many of the Jews which came to Mary, and had seen the things which Jesus did, believed on Him." Many, but not all. "But some of them went their ways to the Pharisees, and told them what things Jesus had done" (Jn. 11:45, 46). They assembled, and not only were not mollified in their stubborn unbelief, or, more accurately, their disobedience to the truth, but, in accordance with the voiced intent of Caiaphas, determined to kill the Slayer of Death; yet even this did not seem enough for them. "The chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death; because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus" (12:10, 11). Note that in their decision there is neither a denial of the miracle, nor an indication of any guilt on the part of either of those they had condemned: an unjust execution, decided beforehand, was their sole means of keeping the people in unbelief, and they determined to utilize such means.

     The words which the Lord put on the lips of Abraham concerning the extent of man's hardheartedness were thus proved true in all their terrible accuracy: whoever does not want to listen to Moses and the prophets will not believe one who has risen from the dead. The Apostle John does not cite the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus, but somewhat earlier cites Christ's words which link the Jews' disbelief in His miracles to disobedience to Moses and secret unbelief in his law, which proceed from moral callousness and the seeking of their own, not God's glory. "There is one that accuses you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed Me: for he wrote of Me. But if ye believed not his writings, how shall ye believe My words?" (Jn. 5:45-47).

     Yet another puzzle remains which is often put to theologians: Why is the resurrection of Lazarus mentioned neither by the evangelist who cites the Lord's parable of the inheritor of paradise of the same name, nor by the other two synoptic evangelists? Metropolitan Philaret of Moscow asked this question on one Academy examination, and when no one undertook to answer it, he replied thus: when the first three Gospels were written, Lazarus was still alive and, forever burdened as it were by the inquiries of those around him concerning what his soul experienced when it separated from his body, he would have become upset and embarrassed should this event have been made public in all the Churches during his lifetime; therefore, it was included only in the fourth Gospel, which was written after the death of Lazarus.

     The scholarly biographer of Metropolitan Philaret marvels at the wisdom and simplicity of this explanation, but he did not know that this explanation is drawn entirely from the Synaxarion of the Lenten Triodion. The pre-eminence of the late metropolitan over his colleagues lies in the fact that in their introductory research the latter merely travelled along the paths of the negative critics, trying to defeat them with their own weapon, and studied the Bible too little outside of these polemical maneuvres, while the metropolitan delved into it and into the Church's Tradition, not only with a critical interest, but with a positive one, free of polemic.

     A similar point of view will help us clear up an even more frequent problem. From the very sequence of the narrative of the fourth Gospel, we can see that the Apostle is writing a supplementary narrative to books that were written earlier concerning events already known to his readers. Such a supplementary narrative is the description of the miracle performed on Lazarus who was four days dead, composed with the same clarity of detail which in general distinguishes St. John's accounts from those of the first three evangelists, and completely demolishes the pitiful theory of the German negative critics on the spuriousness of the fourth Gospel, which they allege was composed in the middle of the second century by "obscure gnostic philosophers."

     Thus, St. John wishes to relate the raising of Lazarus to those readers who knew of the anointing of the Lord with oil at the meal, of His Entrance into Jerusalem, and of the treachery of Judas, but did not know of this great miracle of the Lord, whereby He assured us of the General Resurrection.

     Readers of the first Gospels may have been puzzled as to why the people of Jerusalem who before had met the Lord with wary curiosity and disputations, now so unanimously went forth to meet Him, rendering Him royal, and even divine, veneration. True, the Evangelist Luke says that the people glorified Him for all His miracles, but this hint is not very clear to the reader, for the miracles of the Lord were known to the teachers of Jerusalem even during His previous visits to the city. Thus, only the Evangelist John, linking this event with the raising of Lazarus, dispels the reader's perplexity.

     It is with precisely this thought that he ended his narrative with the words: "For this cause the people also met Him, for that they heard that He had done this miracle" (Jn. 12:18). A similar, more detailed elucidation of events which were known, but not clear, to readers of the first three Gospels, we find in John's account of the miracle of the five loaves and the Savior's subsequent walking on the water. The fourth evangelist explains that the people, carried away by the miraculous visitation, wished to seize the Wonderworker by force and proclaim Him king. To escape the frenzy of the people, the Lord hid for a time in the desert, sending His disciples ahead by boat; and later, after the people had fallen asleep, the Lord, postponing the fulfilment of His intention until the next day, withdrew from the people by walking on the waters of the lake.

     The tradition of the Church that the Evangelists did not record the Lord's raising of Lazarus before the day of his second death renders quite plausible the theory that all of chapter eleven, or perhaps only the first 45 verses of it, as well as the second half of the first verse and verses 9-11, 17, and 18 of chapter twelve, were written by the Evangelist after he had completed the Gospel, that is, when Lazarus reposed a second time. We are led to such a conclusion by the narrator's second return to the day of the raising of Lazarus ("six days before the Passover," etc.) and to the solemn evening meal which took place that day at his home. Here we are told how Mary poured ointment on the Savior's feet; while in chapter eleven, where, upon first mention of Mary and Martha, it is said: "It was that Mary which anointed the Lord with ointment, and wiped His feet with her hair," as of an event already known to the reader (but not from the first two Gospels, for there the pouring of ointment on the head of the Lord in the house of Simon the Leper is spoken of). Thus, it is very likely that the Gospel according to John was written during Lazarus' life, and that the narrative of his resurrection was added by the Evangelist after his death, exactly as all of chapter twenty-one of that Gospel was added by the Apostle later, as a result of the stories spread during his old age that he would never die. This is why, let us add, the Gospel according to John has two concluding epilogues, each rather similar to the other: one at the end of chapter twenty, and another at the end of chapter twenty-one, in which his original silence concerning the appearance of the Lord at the Sea of Tiberias is explained by the words "if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written." Thus the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus, written down by one of the first three evangelists, the synoptics, was, b y the resurrection of Lazarus and the unbelief of the Jews described by the Evangelist John, actually vindicated in its puzzling idea expressed in the words: "if they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." But did the Evangelist have this internal connection between the event and the parable in mind? There are no direct indications of this in the Gospel, but he unintentionally lets reference to the unalterable obstinacy of the unbelief of the Jews slip from his pen and, having finished his depiction of the events of these two great days in the earthly life of the Savior, in disregard of his usual manner, he abandons the tone of an objective, unbiased narrator, and says: "But though He had done so many miracles before them, yet they believed not on Him: That the saying of Esaias the prophet might be fulfilled which he spake, Lord, who hath believed our report? and to whom hat! h the arm of the Lord been revealed? Therefore they could not believe, because that Esaias said again, He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them. These things said Esaias, when he saw His glory and spake of Him" (Jn. 12:37-41).

     Indeed the unbelief of the leaders of the Jews and of the more influential teachers of Jerusalem, not yielding before such a striking, obvious miracle performed in the sight of a whole crowd of people, is one of the amazing phenomena of the history of mankind; thenceforth, it ceased being unbelief, and became rather a conscious opposition to the obvious truth ("Now have they both seen and hated both Me and My Father" - Jn. 15:24), which is also expressed in the mood of the chief priests and the multitude of the people at the trial before Pilate.

     In all five of his works, the Evangelist John discloses to his readers his main theme: that, as the world, that is, human obstinacy and malice, fought against Christ, even though His righteousness shone upon the world like the sun, so will it fight against His followers, hating their righteous life as Cain hated Abel (I Jn. 3:12), so will it hate God and His servants to the end of time, despite the manifest works of His might and His righteous retribution (Rev. 9:20, et al.)

     We have long wished to publish an analysis of St. John's writings as works which supplement the New Testament teachings of the first evangelists with a view to encouraging the Christian martyrs and shaming the faint-hearted (Rev. 21:8), both of which groups were awaiting the thousand-year reign of Christ in the lifetime of their own generation (II Thess. 2); official duties, however, deprive us of the opportunity of undertaking this worthwhile task in the near future, but we invite other lovers of the word of God to do so. Having set about it, they would see that all the narratives of the fourth Gospel are permeated and bound together by this thought; the entire Apocalypse is devoted to it, as are all three of the epistles of the Apostle.

     The above-mentioned hindrance does not afford us an opportunity to verify our conjecture as to why the Lord called the blessed poor man of His parable by name. All the same, we know one very authoritative corroboration for it in Church teaching: viz., for six days, the whole of the sixth week of the Great Fast, the Church exalts Lazarus who was four days dead and the Lazarus of the parable. Having in mind not the enemies of Christ, but those who worship Him, who gather in the holy churches for the podvig of prayer, the Church teaches us to understand under the guise of both Lazaruses our sovereign mind and conscience, which the sinner neglects as the Rich Man did Lazarus, and which, having died within man's soul, can be restored to life (like Lazarus who was four days dead) only by the power of Christ; but this connection is nearly the same which we indicated at the beginning of this article, the only difference being that here the historical Lazarus (four days dead) also takes on the significance of a moral symbol.

     Instead of the struggle between faith and unbelief, the struggle in the soul of man between the passions and the conscience is depicted, since those who do not believe do not appear among those who pray; on the other hand, according to the teachings of Christ, the struggle between faith and unbelief takes place not in the realm of abstract thought, but is shown to be a particular aspect of the struggle between good and evil in our soul, the struggle between the passions and the conscience. Herein lies the explanation of the Lord's words: "If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." The hard-hearted Jews' disbelief in the risen Lazarus has borne out this saying with such force that now no one can consider it an exaggeration.
 
Translated by Seraphim F. Englehardt from the series The Biography and Works of His Beatitude Metropolitan Anthony of Kiev and Galich, edited and compiled by Archbishop Nikon (Rklitsky), (New York: 1969) Vol. XVII, pp. 49-54.
 
Church / Monastery News:
 

     This Palm Sunday marks the first year anniversary of the ordination of the first ROAC priest in Bulgaria, Father Lyudmil. We wish to congratulate Father Lyudmil on this anniversary, and we send up thanks and glory to God for the blossoming of true Orthodoxy in this ancient nation.

     This week we would like to congratulate Father Fotios and Matushka Rachael with their purchase of a new home in Virginia. The new home has over 2800 square feet of living area, which, Lord willing in the future, will have a house chapel.


     On the Fifth Sunday of the Great Fast, whereon we commemorate our Holy Mother among the Saints Mary of Egypt, Bishop Gregory served the Divine Liturgy at the house Chapel of the Great Martyr George in DuBois, Pennsylvania.

     Among the faithful in attendance was Thomas Panowicz, whom Vladyka Gregory tonsured to the rank of Reader. Reader Thomas comes from New York and entered the Russian Orthodox Autonomous Church a year ago. Reader Thomas grew up in the Carpatho-Russian Church, and joined the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad.

     He was received into the ROAC by Father Dionysi McGowan. To save Vladyka the burden of carrying a communion set all the way from Colorado, and also in anticipation of a future parish in Pennsylvania, or western New York, Thomas purchased a communion set, which Vladyka blessed and used for the first time during that Divine Liturgy.

     We pray that Reader Thomas' service for the Holy Church will prove spiritually fruitful.

     On Monday, the 29th, Vladyka was driven to the airport in Pittsburgh by Gregory Charnisky, and his wife Catherine. Gregory and Catherine were baptized by Vladyka a few years ago on one of his pastoral visits to Virginia. While he was visiting with the Charniskys,  Vladyka was told a very charming story, which happened to them not too long ago, which we wish them to relate in the future.

     From Pittsburgh Vladyka flew to Orlando, Florida, from whence he drove all the way to Tallahassee, the capital of Florida, because he had an appointment the following day to visit with another inmate who converted to Orthodoxy, Leo Weaver. The appointment was for 9am, and he was only given one hour, enough for confession and communion and renewal of the spirit. Leo converted to holy Orthodoxy and was baptized in the prison two years previous.

     From there, Vladyka drove across the border to Georgia to meet with the Cook family in Colquitt, Georgia. There, Mark, Catherine, Maria, Anastasia, Jonathan, Sarra and Mark received confession and communion. The rest of the day was spent in an edifying manner, encouraging the young children and their parents in their life on the narrow path of true Orthodoxy.

     The following day Vladyka drove all the way down past Tampa, Florida, to Palmetto, where Stephen Tanner received holy confession and Holy Communion. Stephen was baptized two years earlier in Tampa Bay. Thank God our faithful are holding fast to the proper conduct of life in the midst of so much apostasy. In the Tampa Bay area there are many, many Orthodox churches, but not one with confessing bishops, as in all of Florida. This situation we hope to remedy in the near future.

     As Vladyka was returning to the east side of the state, Clement Mills phoned him from the city of Tampa. He and his two daughters have moved to Florida, and are trying to find a suitable place for a home in the Tampa area. So we see that Florida is growing with Orthodox ROAC faithful. Glory to God.

     Vladyka spent that night with his 99 year old aunt, and the next morning flew back to Colorado. All together, Vladyka drove over 2000 miles during this pastoral trip to Florida and Pennsylvania. Of course, there were many, many more faithful in Texas, Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina. However, Vladyka was away for about a week and a half, and time constraints would not allow his further travel before Holy Week.
 
Please pray for:
 
     The health of our Vladika Metropolitan Valentine and Father Savvas, that the blood clots may continue to evaporate in his leg.

     For the servant of Clement, that he find work in Florida.
 
Calendar of Events for Upcoming Week:
 
     This week is Holy Week. Annunciation falls on Holy Wednesday, so wine and oil is permitted that day. Holy Friday is the most solemn fast day of the year. We do not eat on this day, if it is possible.
 
Crumbs from the trapeza table -- From the Life of Saint Afxentios:
 
     Now it happened, from time to time, that some of the saint's friends and comrades-in-arms would ascend the mountain in order to converse with, and receive spiritual benefit from, the holy man. One such soldier, planning a visit, also thought to ask a fellow soldier to accompany him up the mountain to see the great Afxentios. The other soldier, a scoffer, did not believe Afxentios to be a venerable man, but called him a deceiver, one led astray, and a trickster. That ignorant unbeliever further scorned the saint and said, "He pays the poor, he pays many of them, from three to six copper coins, so that some of them should feign demonic possession. Thus, he fools the people into thinking he is some kind of wonder-worker." The goodly soldier, despite his comrade's unholy doubts and slander, persuaded him to come along with him to the mountain. Once the two soldiers were in the presence of the saint, Afxentios spoke cheerfully with the believing ! soldier. As for the other one, the incredulous detractor of the saint, Afxentios spoke not the least word to him. Therefore, when both soldiers descended the mountain, the unbeliever once again resumed condemning the righteous man, saying that "all that Afxentios does is for the sake of appearance, that he might vaunt his supposed virtue."

     When the two soldiers approached Emero, on the side of Chalcedon, behold, the slave of the unbelieving soldier ran up to his master! Distressed, weeping, and with his tunic rent, he began to say, "Thy daughter, master, has become demonized. The lass has fallen into dire straits at thy home." Upon hearing those words alone, that soldier, as if he received a sudden blow to the head, straightway heard a great voice crying out in his mind, "Woe to me, the unbeliever!" Much broken in spirit and lamenting bitterly, he then turned to his God-loving friend, who in turn looked upon him compassionately and spoke those words which our Lord uttered to Jairos, "Cease being afraid; believe only, and she shall be made well [cf. Lk. 8:50]." The father, willing to correct his foolishness and a dilemma which he believed was of his own making and for which his daughter was suffering, very much wanted to believe and said as much: "I believe, but help my unbelief [cf. Mk. 9:24]. Let us go to my house." The soldiers and the servant then entered the city and the house. The father then bound his demonized daughter with ropes and brought her to Oxeia. They ascended the mountain and came before the window of the saint's cell. The demon within the damsel dreadfully tormented her. The holy man opened the window of his cell and saw that the damsel was cruelly troubled by a demon. He then thought it good to test the father and said, "Was it for three or six copper coins?" For what reason did the venerable man ask this? That he might demonstrate to the damsel's father that, on account of his disbelief, what he had spoken against the saint, had come to pass. Moreover, what the unbelieving soldier has said privately to his comrade was clearly revealed by the Holy Spirit to the saint. The soldier cast himself to the ground, together with his daughter. With a flow of warm tears streaming down his face, he begged to be pardoned. The saint said, "Christ, the Master and Savior of all, f oresaw all these things concerning thee. He knows what thou hast spoken and done from afar." The saint then summoned others who were also present to draw closer. He again asked the father in a meek manner, "What was the amount given to thy daughter? Three or six coppers?" The father again burst out weeping vehemently, and begged to be forgiven. The blessed one not only forgave him, but also bade him, together with his wife and daughter, to remain constant in prayer and fasting in their home for seven days. The man of God, for his part, promised to supplicate God on behalf of the damsel. He then dismissed them in peace, making the sign of the Cross over them. Both father and daughter returned home. They followed the saint's instructions carefully. However, before the father departed, Afxentios counseled him again not to have doubts about the miracles and wonders which are energized by God daily through His slaves.

     "Be having faith in God, and doubt not," said the saint. "And do bring to mind the words of our Savior: 'Whatsoever ye ask for yourselves when ye pray, keep on believing that ye are receiving them, and they shall be to you [cf. Mk. 11:22, 24]."' On the seventh day, after the saint sent up earnest prayer on behalf of the girl that entire week, both parents arrived with their daughter. The saint blessed her, and she was completely restored. Afterward, that father and his family reformed their lax lives regarding their spiritual welfare; and they attended church regularly, according to the saint's directions.
 
Excerpted from The Great Synaxaristes of the Orthodox Church, February Volume, by Holy Apostles Convent, 2004; used with permission, all rights reserved.
 
Through the prayers of our holy fathers, Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on us and save us.  Amen.
 
In Christ,
 
+Bishop Gregory, and those with me.

Post Reply