[quote="Kybihetz21"] This is a short article I quickly wrote for another site where the main administrator had changed the name of the group to reflect a more "lukewarmness" stand (either consciously, or as I am prone to believe, rather unconsciously) toward the MP:
Good article Michael. I was wondering though. What was the name of this site that your talking about and what is it called now ?
I like the short article by Kybihetz21, too. I might want to post it on the Remnant R0C0R blog, or link to it.
About if 0bama can be the Antichrist: Certainly he serves the antichrist spirit [Mystery of Iniquity], I do not doubt in the least that Pravoslavnik saw 0bama's true demonic nature through his mask on the TV one time. But 0bama can not be "The" Antichrist. The Antichrist who will establish one world government and one world church will have a pretended virgin for a mother, and an unknown father [some kind of artificial insemination or test tube conception]. And also before he comes on the scene, Russia is going to have a short "flowering" [maybe 15 years] with thousands of people coming by the boat loads from all over the world to be baptized, and there will be a God appointed Tsar of the Romanov house at that time. And Antichrist will set up his capital in Jerusalem. So it is not 0bama, but 0bama is one of antichrist's servants, for sure.
Someone brought to my attention the following headline found at http://remnantrocor.blogspot.com:
“This is a recent post taken from the Euphrosynos Cafe forum. Some in the ROCOR-MP are not entirely happy with the union, and they are still being monitored by pro-unionists positioned in strategic places on the internet.”
Please do clarify this as I have NEVER been a part of the Moscow Patriarchate, nor of the pseudo church organization created by archbishop/metropolitan Laurus after he ousted Metropolitan Vitalii from his see.
The site in question where I published those comments is NOT a MP site, but a forum where different factions/remnants of the old ROCA post pictures, comments, etc., and which name was changed by one of the administrators for personal reasons. My comments were not done to insinuate his participation or support of the MP, but to reassure him and everyone that any stance we have in the matter must and shall only be defending the Truth and against the falsehood of the parasynagogue of Satan that the soviet “church” is.
That’s all I have to say.
I was curious too where the article had appeared.
I think I came across that facebook place. Was it called anti-union or similar?
A link several times took me there to a neat pic.
I meant to go back and look at it in more detail.
Is the site still active, then?
Here on this site, we know that you left with Met Vitaly way way back.
Remnant Rocor probably thought the article was so good [as did I and many others] that the editor rushed to post it, leaping to several conclusions which were not merited.
For example, you did not say that your co-administrator was in the MP.
Merely that the person was [maybe being bombarded by subconscious suggestion - that HAS happened more than is realized, I believe] changing the name to something more waffly and you were disapproving, hence wrote to protest that.
That little icon smiley makes me chuckle, it's so expressive!
I checked that, too, because there was a note referring readers back to a new comment on that post.
But there was neither Comment, nor Correction of what amounts to a gross misrepresentation of Kyb's analysis.
An unintentional oversight of course.
But it does give entirely the wrong twist on his essay.
Such a description may set off alarm bells on 93rd and Park, and, if allowed to continue, could even trigger a ROCOR-MP witch-hunt for people of Latin American origin in the ranks.
Somebody's sound asleep in Oregon.