Is Barak Obama the Antichrist?

[Euthymios]

Yes, and the school in Indonesia he attended had extremest views.

Your theory he might be the antichrist is interesting. He does seem to have a charisma and "likability" about him. Edwards even supported him several times in the debates.

I personally believe Edwards is an implant to point people toward Obama.

But people always see the antichrist behind every corner. I remember people thought Reagan was the Antichrist.

He certainly is AN antichrist, but I don't know if he is the main guy.

With regard to Saint John, I think the story I heard or read was that he stopped on the street, crossed himself, and said something to the affect that the Antichrist is here. I don't recall him saying he was born in 1960, but I could be wrong. It was a long time ago I read that.

[Euthymios]

Also, I believe Hillary will be the next appointed president. Not because of votes, but because she has been appointed by the Freemasonic republic. That's what I believe. I believe this nation is a Masonic nation. Satan and his minions hi-jacked the world governments long ago.

[Pravoslavnik]

Euthymios,

Code: Select all

 People have always been known to see the Antichrist behind every tree--Reagan, Clinton, Bush, the Pope, etc.  I am not one of those, but do certainly wonder about Barak Obama. Many in the early Church apparently thought of Nero or Caligula as the Antichrist.  Orthodox Russians certainly wondered whether Napoleon Bonaparte was the Antichrist.  According to St. John of San Francisco, and the Holy Scriptures, the Antichrist will be a descendant of the Hebrew tribe of Dan, and will achieve great worldly power in the end times, persecuting the Church after coming to power.   This "son of perdition" must surely be a man who secretly hates Christ and the Church, and champions a general denial of Christ's divinity.

   A denial of Christ's divinity is certainly central to Islam, which regards our Lord Jesus Christ as "Isa," a lesser prophet than Mohammed, who described himself as the "Paraclete," or Holy Spirit, who would lead Christ's Apostles in the way of all truth.  Certainly, any serious Christian cannot but regard Islam as an abomination.  Yet, modern agnostic Americans are now embracing Obama as if he were some sort of New Age messiah, and the press has scarcely addressed the issue of Obama's Islamic/Unitarian worldview.  Our modern culture has rendered such a topic virtually off-limits.

 Two other comments.  I heard the story about St. John and the birth of the Antichrist from a Russian priest who was very close to a man who was with St. John when this incident occurred.  My version of the story is, therefore, second hand, but it is not "third hand."

  Finally, it is concerning that [i]both[/i] of Barak Obama's parents are from families which actively denied the divinity of Christ God.  Obama's mother, as nearly as I can tell, was clearly, vocally, anti-Christian--even marrying two Moslems and enrolling her son in a Moslem school, despite having grandparents in Kansas who were (nominal) Christians.  His father, Barak Obama, Sr., was actively involved in the government of Jomo Kenyatta--notorious for murder and pillaging of Christian communities in Kenya.  Barak was also descended from a family of Christians in Kenya who rejected Christianity to become Moslems.   Hence, both sides of Barak Obama's family actively denied Christ and embraced Satan.

[nyc_xenia]

I don't believe there is any way for us to know who the "Man of Lawlessness" is until he reveals himself.

Actually, there are heaps of writings on the Antichrist and plenty of ways to know who he is once he comes.

I'll try to keep it short:

He will be born of a Jewess woman who will appear pure but be full of uncleanliness. The devil will appear to him at an older age and will promise to help him. He will rise to power and be acknowledged as the awaited "moshiach", http://www.moshiach.com/ then he will be crowned the "King of Israel". The signs leading up to this point are fire coming down from heaven, the temple being re-established, the golden gate (in Jerusalem) being reopened for his mocking of Palm Sunday as well as the possible planning and establishment of a global economic system.

Reading through the Protocols of the elders of zion helps to point out the ultimate "plan" for the preparation of the Antichrist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protoc ... rs_of_Zion

Just keep in mind that the "Antichrist" is he who will come "as if" he were Christ. So, all that see him will marvel and wonder if he is Christ "come again".

Obama doesn't cut the mustard.

[Ekaterina]

NYCXenia wrote:

Reading through the Protocols of the elders of zion helps to point out the ultimate "plan" for the preparation of the Antichrist.

Excuse me but how can a work that has long been proven to be a HOAX be taken for anything but a hoax?

Katya

[GOCTheophan]

NYCXenia wrote:

Reading through the Protocols of the elders of zion helps to point out the ultimate "plan" for the preparation of the Antichrist.

Excuse me but how can a work that has long been proven to be a HOAX be taken for anything but a hoax?

Katya

Katya the above reminds me of monk Gregory of Colorado's tactics aganist the Holy ones of God.

Do you consider St Seraphim's conversation with Molatov also a hoax?

Why do you repeat Freemasonic slanders aganist a great Russian confessor who was friends with the elders of Optina and St John of Kronstadht?

Do you consider yourself and the "scholars" of the apostate and demonized west better judges than clairvoyant Orthodox saints? If you seriously do you really disgust me.

Even though I disagreed with you strongly I still thought better of you.

I really hope you will take back what you have written above.

Theophan.

[Ekaterina]

Theophan:

My first reaction to what you wrote is ....HUH???????

I asked a simple question....if we Orthodox are for TRUTH than how can a proven hoax be anything worth our consideration?

There are literally TONS of writings about the Antichrist by the most saintly of personages within the Orthodox realm of writings, absolutely reams of it... Why oh why must we always get back to this piece of doodoo and even hold it up as something even remotely true?

As to your other statements.... first I can't even phathom where you got that from my one statement and second I won't even go there ...'cause, honey are you ever of the mark.
:ohvey: :ohvey: :ohvey: :ohvey:

Katya

Somewhere in this forum there is a whole thread about this piece of doodoo. Maybe someone with more time on their hands can dig it up and save us a whole lot of space, time and energy.