Debate/Discussion: Suaidan v Whiteford

[Barbara]

This post is not related to the thread.
But i didn't see any other place to put - not important enough to start a NEW thread fo.

It's about Fr John Whiteford's daughter Catherine.

She recently won a political race to be Co=Chairman of Young Republicans.

But when she was running for some other office, she was outright campaigning with homo...uals ! Catering to them, visiting their "celebrations" etc.

How could Fr John ALLOW this from his only daughter ???

She is supposed to be an Orthodox Christian, but look at THIS attire ! Besides the ridiculously immodest top, in bright red, her jewelry is gaudy and tacky.

This image speaks poorly for how Catherine was raised by a Rocor-MP Priest, no less !

[haralampopoulosjc]

I know Father said his last word on this, but me and our dearest brother Ezekiel were talking about the debate/discussion with Fr. Joseph and Fr. John, and it was interesting that Fr. John said Sergianism "isn't a heresy", yet will argue that the definition of Sergianism doesn't fit the MP anyway, and that Sergius "repented" in this unlikely story he tells about some MP pseudo-elder.

So which one is it? If Sergianism isn't a heresy, then by his standard Sergius didn't have to repent, nor need to. And if it's not a heresy, even if the MP did fit the definitions he will argue about, they're not in heresy!

His point is that what Sergius did constituted a major sin but not heresy, and this is what he was repenting of.