1935 Confession to the State Church of Greece
Another 1935 Confession of Faith
"To the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church of Greece
It is well known among the members of the Hierarchy of Greece that we have always been opposed to its views regarding the substitution of ecclesiastical calendar for ...
Search found 56 matches
- Wed 25 February 2015 4:57 pm
- Forum: Anathemas: Past and Current Heresies
- Topic: The THREE confessions of 1935
- Replies: 1
- Views: 16758
- Tue 24 February 2015 2:24 pm
- Forum: Anathemas: Past and Current Heresies
- Topic: St Ignatius Brianchaninov on Anathema
- Replies: 1
- Views: 16330
St Ignatius Brianchaninov on Anathema
Taken from his homily on the Sunday of Orthodoxy:
http://orthodoxy1982.blogspot.com/2015/02/st-ignatius-brianchaninov-on-anathema.html?m=1
The word anathema means severance, rejection. When the Church anathematizes a teaching, it means that that teaching contains blasphemy against the Holy Spirit ...
http://orthodoxy1982.blogspot.com/2015/02/st-ignatius-brianchaninov-on-anathema.html?m=1
The word anathema means severance, rejection. When the Church anathematizes a teaching, it means that that teaching contains blasphemy against the Holy Spirit ...
- Thu 19 February 2015 11:50 am
- Forum: Theology and Tradition
- Topic: Can icons representing the Father be venerated?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 76666
Can icons representing the Father be venerated?
Yes, Western Icons in the cell of St-Mathew the New Confessor. This fact says all !!
But we do have to ask FR. Nilos: although we can venerate the Icon of the Trinity, is it PREFERRED? Would it not be better if these icons which have a Latin influence are eventually phased out? Or if people ...
But we do have to ask FR. Nilos: although we can venerate the Icon of the Trinity, is it PREFERRED? Would it not be better if these icons which have a Latin influence are eventually phased out? Or if people ...
- Tue 17 February 2015 3:36 am
- Forum: Liturgics and Mysteries
- Topic: Bishop Matthew on Frequent Communion
- Replies: 7
- Views: 32509
Re: Bishop Matthew on Frequent Communion
I have been recently reading some things about Metropolitan Kyrikos regarding communion. Although he came from the same synod he seems to have completely discarded Bishop Matthew's position.
He seems to believe that frequent communion is a bad thing for the laity, and makes it very difficult to ...
He seems to believe that frequent communion is a bad thing for the laity, and makes it very difficult to ...
- Mon 16 February 2015 6:36 pm
- Forum: Theology and Tradition
- Topic: Indulgences
- Replies: 3
- Views: 20001
Re: Indulgences
http://orthodoxwiki.org/Absolution_Certificates
A good brief description here. I think is it almost the same
Article?
- Fri 13 February 2015 2:39 pm
- Forum: Heterodox Groupings / Debate
- Topic: Why ROCOR was not enough.
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1390
Why ROCOR was not enough.
a letter by Fr Epiphanios (Anthony) Chernov:
[quote]THE WAY OF THE TRUE CHURCH OF CHRIST
[list]"And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein, But the court which is without the ...
[quote]THE WAY OF THE TRUE CHURCH OF CHRIST
[list]"And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein, But the court which is without the ...
- Fri 13 February 2015 3:01 am
- Forum: Anathemas: Past and Current Heresies
- Topic: 1935 Formation of GOC & Anathama of New Calendarists
- Replies: 0
- Views: 14321
1935 Formation of GOC & Anathama of New Calendarists
A question was recently asked about the history of the GOC back in 1935.
"How could hieromonk Matthew receive the three bishops from the state Church if it was truly schismatic in 1935? As a priest he could not give them their orders, and if they were schismatics, they would have been laymen? SO ...
"How could hieromonk Matthew receive the three bishops from the state Church if it was truly schismatic in 1935? As a priest he could not give them their orders, and if they were schismatics, they would have been laymen? SO ...