Philaret wrote: ↑Tue 9 September 2025 3:41 pm
I am tempted to take a defensive stance, but I didn't come here to put my personal struggle on display. Suffice it to say I have had a long run of dubious encounters with clergy from different jurisdictions. One priest, when discussing the problem of Cyprianism, patristically observed that my "trust generator" is broken. More than one priest gave advice in confession that nearly ended my marriage. And on and on. Please don't prejudge someone without knowing their story. I would love more than anything to have a fully functional trust generator and simply attend the closest church to me.
You need to attend AN Orthodox church even if it means occasional travel. If NO church is good enough, then indeed the churches cannot be the problem. You are falling for the temptation on the right. Priests making mistakes and being wrong are NOT reasons to write them off. If that is your standard, you will be your own church forever.
Sorry but the “don't judge me” thing isn't going to help our souls. You need a dose of realism and you WILL be judged at the end of days. It is really simple: go to church with an expectation of correct doctrine but not of perfect clergy.
And please keep in mind that advice is not the same thing as monastic obedience. Many people today learn of the Faith from monastic writings and unfortunately that has us showing up at parishes with an expectation straight out of the Philokalia. The Fathers we read about are not even ordinary monks, let alone parish priests.
You were commanded to pick up that cross and carry it.
yet you merely sideways glance at Cyprianism.
Nope. I said the union may be overblown. I did not say the writings of Metropolitan Cyprian were not a problem. His jurisdiction, which produced those writings, no longer exists.
The union may have been mishandled. Fine, maybe it was. What is the official ecclesiology of the GOC-K synod today--that is the question you should be asking. If their official position is that the state church is graceless, then how could we call that Cyprianism? The two are mutually exclusive.
If they are too tolerant of Cyprianites in their ranks, then can you really say that they are in bare-headed preaching of heresy in church, or have they merely not done as much as they might to stomp out crypto-ecumenists in the ranks? You do not have a canonical right to break from your bishop over crypto-heresy. It is about public profession.
On the other hand maybe it is really that bad. I'm not an expert on the union and I am not in the GOC-K, that's why I said “I wonder.” I can't think of anyone calling Cyprianism a “theolegoumenon” so maybe you are jumping at shadows.
Not every church is the GOC-K. If you don't want to argue, then pick one. Why not go to the Matthewites or something. Surely you have no grounds to accuse them of Cyprianism, right? Our brother @haralampopoulosjc can probably set you up.