The Acacian Schism and the Akoimetoi

Feel free to tell our little section of the Internet why you're right. Forum rules apply.


User avatar
haralampopoulosjc
Member
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue 3 June 2025 9:22 pm
Faith: Orthodox
Location: Toronto

The Acacian Schism and the Akoimetoi

Post by haralampopoulosjc »

In 482, the Emperor Zeno and Patriarch Acacius of Constantinople co-wrote a document which would become known as the Henotikon, in order to unite the fracturing empire. The document reaffirmed the Nicean Creed, endorsed the Council of Ephesus (431), absolutely condemned both Nestorius and Eutyches, defined Christ as Jesus, the Logos made flesh, who is: "...one and not two; consubstantial with the Father as touching the Godhead, and consubstantial with us as touching the manhood... one and the same Son." (without specifying whether this oneness referred to the nature or person of Christ), and also said: "...and we anathematize every person who has thought or thinks otherwise, either now or at any time, whether at Chalcedon or at any other synod."

This document was signed by Patriarch Matyrius of Jerusalem in order to attain peace among the non-Chalcedonians and Chalcedonians in Palestine, even though he had previously had Chalcedonian sympathies; and had been tonsured a monk at the Lavra of Euthymius.

The Chalcedonian Patriarch of Antioch Calendion refused to sign the Henotikon and supported the rebellion of the Roman general Flavius Illus against the Emperor. Emperor Zeno crushed the rebellion in 484, and recalled the exiled non-Chalcedonian Patriarch Peter the Fuller, who signed the Henotikon and was restored to his see.

The Chalcedonian Patriarch of Alexandria John Talaia refused to sign the Henotikon, and was expelled from his see by the Emperor who recalled the exiled non-Chalcedonian Patriarch Peter Mongus, who signed the Henotikon and was restored to his see. Talaia fled to Italy and sought refuge with Pope Simplicius of Rome. This pope, or his successor Felix III, refused to recognize Mongus and defended Talaia's rights in two letters to Acacius of Constantinople. Felix sent two of his legates to Constantinople in 484, where they participated in a liturgy where Acacius commemorated Peter Mongus as Patriarch of Alexandria in the diptychs. The legates returned to Rome, reported this to the Pope, who subsequently excommunicated Acacius and the rest of the Eastern Churches, resulting in the thirty-five year Acacian schism.

The only clergy in the East who retained communion with Rome, during this period were the so-called Akoimetoi (or "Sleepless Monks"). They earned their name from their defining religious practice: maintaining uninterrupted, 24-hour prayer and divine service. To achieve continuous prayer without sleep deprivation, the community divided its monks into three alternating shifts or choirs (turmae), organized by language (typically Greek, Latin, and Syriac). As soon as one choir finished its service, the next immediately took over, ensuring the liturgy never ceased. The main stronghold of the monastic brotherhood was at the Monastery of Eirenaion on the Asiatic shore of the Bosphorus. In 484, the Akoimetoi broke communion with Patriarch Acacius and placed themselves under the jurisdiction of the pope of Rome. Legend says that an Akoimetoi monk secretly pinned the papal decree of excommunication onto the back of Acacius's robes during a divine liturgy in the Hagia Sophia. During the entire thirty-five year period of the Acacian schism the Akoimetoi acted as the Pope's spies and agents in Constantinople. Their downfall came about when they refused to acknowledge the Emperor Justinian's 'Theopaschite formula' ("One of the Trinity suffered in the flesh"), and in 534 they were condemned as Nestorians by Pope John II of Rome. The Akoimetoi continued to subsist at their monastery for decades after their official condemnation, outside of communion with everyone.

Thomas_Deretich
Member
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri 14 September 2012 10:23 pm

Re: The Acacian Schism and the Akoimetoi

Post by Thomas_Deretich »

haralampopoulosjc wrote: Sat 4 July 2026 6:52 pm

Henotikon .... Nestorius and Eutyches .... Chalcedon .... the thirty-five year Acacian schism .... Akoimetoi

Another one of countless examples where the Church's teaching is precise and balanced, but heretics go to distorted extremes or compromises with distorted extremes. Dioscorus compromised with the Eutychian heresy, the Henotikon compromised with the Dioscorians, whereas some of the later Acoemetae (Ἀκοίμητοι) seem to have compromised with a form of semi-Nestorianism. Acacius went into schism and some Acoemetae went into schism. It should be obvious that both the Nestorians and semi-Nestorians on one side and the Miaphysite anti-Chalcedonians on the other side went to one distorted side at the expense of the precise and balanced truth maintained by the Church at the consensus councils, including Chalcedon.

Jn: πάτερ ἅγιε, τήρησον αὐτοὺς ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί σου. CyrA: ἐν ὀνόματι τοῦ Πατρὸς … οἱονεὶ τὸ ἐν δόξῃ καὶ δυνάμει θεότητος…. Πατρός ἐνέργειαν. 1Clem: τῶν ἐν καθαρᾷ συνειδήσει λατρευόντων τῷ παναρέτῳ ὀνόματι αὐτοῦ…. τὸ ἀρχέγονον πάσης κτίσεως ὄνομά σου. HermSim: τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ Υἱοῦ τοῦ Θεοῦ μέγα ἐστὶ καὶ ἀχώρητον καὶ τὸν κόσμον ὅλον βαστάζει . GrP: ὅτε μίαν Θεότητά φαμεν, πάντα ὅσα ἐστὶν ὁ Θεός φαμεν, καὶ τὴν οὐσίαν καὶ τὴν ἐνέργειαν. GrP: ἑκάστη δύναμις ἢ ἐνέργεια αὐτός ἐστιν ὁ Θεός. GrP: τοῦ θείου ὀνόματος…. μόνῳ Θεῷ. MēnJan6: δοξάζηταί σου τὸ πανάγιον ὄνομα, σὺν τῷ Πατρί, καὶ τῷ Ἁγίῳ Πνεύματι. JnKr: Имя Божіе есть самъ Богъ. TikhM: Имя Его не считать за сущность Божию, не отделять от Бога, не почитать за особое Божество, не обожать букв и звуков и случайных мыслей о Боге

User avatar
haralampopoulosjc
Member
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue 3 June 2025 9:22 pm
Faith: Orthodox
Location: Toronto

Re: The Acacian Schism and the Akoimetoi

Post by haralampopoulosjc »

@Thomas_Deretich Who are the "Nestorians and semi-Nestorians" that you're referring to?

Thomas_Deretich
Member
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri 14 September 2012 10:23 pm

Re: The Acacian Schism and the Akoimetoi

Post by Thomas_Deretich »

To simplify, Nestorius and Theodore are Nestorians. Semi-Nestorians would/could include any Acoemetae or others who proclaimed Chalcedon but distorted it in a semi-Nestorian direction. The point is that there were distortions in two opposite directions. Some violated “unconfused.” Some violated “indivisible.” The Orthodox Church adhered to the truth, and excluded distortions in either direction. Just as Nestorianism is a clear distortion, anti-Chalcedonianism became a clear distortion.

Jn: πάτερ ἅγιε, τήρησον αὐτοὺς ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί σου. CyrA: ἐν ὀνόματι τοῦ Πατρὸς … οἱονεὶ τὸ ἐν δόξῃ καὶ δυνάμει θεότητος…. Πατρός ἐνέργειαν. 1Clem: τῶν ἐν καθαρᾷ συνειδήσει λατρευόντων τῷ παναρέτῳ ὀνόματι αὐτοῦ…. τὸ ἀρχέγονον πάσης κτίσεως ὄνομά σου. HermSim: τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ Υἱοῦ τοῦ Θεοῦ μέγα ἐστὶ καὶ ἀχώρητον καὶ τὸν κόσμον ὅλον βαστάζει . GrP: ὅτε μίαν Θεότητά φαμεν, πάντα ὅσα ἐστὶν ὁ Θεός φαμεν, καὶ τὴν οὐσίαν καὶ τὴν ἐνέργειαν. GrP: ἑκάστη δύναμις ἢ ἐνέργεια αὐτός ἐστιν ὁ Θεός. GrP: τοῦ θείου ὀνόματος…. μόνῳ Θεῷ. MēnJan6: δοξάζηταί σου τὸ πανάγιον ὄνομα, σὺν τῷ Πατρί, καὶ τῷ Ἁγίῳ Πνεύματι. JnKr: Имя Божіе есть самъ Богъ. TikhM: Имя Его не считать за сущность Божию, не отделять от Бога, не почитать за особое Божество, не обожать букв и звуков и случайных мыслей о Боге

Thomas_Deretich
Member
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri 14 September 2012 10:23 pm

Re: The Acacian Schism and the Akoimetoi

Post by Thomas_Deretich »

In order to adhere to Orthodoxy, one must keep “without confusion” and “without division” in balance. Both in Triadology and Christology, one must distinguish between “essence/substance/nature” and “person” (υπόστασις or πρόσωπον), in order not to distort the truth. Not just Eutyches, but also Dioscorus (who exonerated Eutyches), went in a one-sided direction. Anti-Chalcedonianism rejects Cyril-like language in Leo. Anti-Chalcedonianism is incoherent and confused in the way it refuses to clearly distinguish essence/nature and person. Anti-Chalcedonianism grossly violates “without confusion,” even though Anti-Chalcedonians admit “without confusion” is a requirement of orthodox truth. Anti-Chalcedonians say completely opposite things on essence and energies and on deification. Anti-Chalcedonians lie when they claim “all” early Fathers used “one nature” language. As the Patristic Greek Lexicon states (under the word φύσις), the Fathers before Nestorius and Cyril predominately used “two physeis” not “one physis” language. Cyril used both. In Latin, natura and persona were already distinct. So, Chalcedon followed the majority tradition (sometimes followed by Cyril himself) in clearly distinguishing hypostasis and physis and in clearly proclaiming one hypostasis in two physeis.

Jn: πάτερ ἅγιε, τήρησον αὐτοὺς ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί σου. CyrA: ἐν ὀνόματι τοῦ Πατρὸς … οἱονεὶ τὸ ἐν δόξῃ καὶ δυνάμει θεότητος…. Πατρός ἐνέργειαν. 1Clem: τῶν ἐν καθαρᾷ συνειδήσει λατρευόντων τῷ παναρέτῳ ὀνόματι αὐτοῦ…. τὸ ἀρχέγονον πάσης κτίσεως ὄνομά σου. HermSim: τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ Υἱοῦ τοῦ Θεοῦ μέγα ἐστὶ καὶ ἀχώρητον καὶ τὸν κόσμον ὅλον βαστάζει . GrP: ὅτε μίαν Θεότητά φαμεν, πάντα ὅσα ἐστὶν ὁ Θεός φαμεν, καὶ τὴν οὐσίαν καὶ τὴν ἐνέργειαν. GrP: ἑκάστη δύναμις ἢ ἐνέργεια αὐτός ἐστιν ὁ Θεός. GrP: τοῦ θείου ὀνόματος…. μόνῳ Θεῷ. MēnJan6: δοξάζηταί σου τὸ πανάγιον ὄνομα, σὺν τῷ Πατρί, καὶ τῷ Ἁγίῳ Πνεύματι. JnKr: Имя Божіе есть самъ Богъ. TikhM: Имя Его не считать за сущность Божию, не отделять от Бога, не почитать за особое Божество, не обожать букв и звуков и случайных мыслей о Боге

User avatar
haralampopoulosjc
Member
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue 3 June 2025 9:22 pm
Faith: Orthodox
Location: Toronto

Re: The Acacian Schism and the Akoimetoi

Post by haralampopoulosjc »

Thomas_Deretich wrote: Sun 12 July 2026 10:44 am

To simplify, Nestorius and Theodore are Nestorians. Semi-Nestorians would/could include any Acoemetae or others who proclaimed Chalcedon but distorted it in a semi-Nestorian direction.

I thought that you were referring to the Church of the East and the Chalcedonians respectively.

Thomas_Deretich
Member
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri 14 September 2012 10:23 pm

Re: The Acacian Schism and the Akoimetoi

Post by Thomas_Deretich »

I see. If the Akoimetoi actually became semi-Nestorian, I have no problem admitting it. Eutyches forced Leo to emphasize the two natures without confusion, but Leo also emphasized the one undivided person. There were real Monophysite temptations in the East. So, although some Westerners wrongly opposed condemning the Three Chapters, they were not necessarily semi-Nestorian for doing so. They were suspicious of possible attempts to chip away at Chalcedon to placate Monophysites. The term “Neo-Chalcedonian” is a prejudiced (even slanderous) term based on the false idea that 451 and 553 were inconsistent. 451 admitted bishops who condemned Nestorius. 451 did not deeply investigate all the many writings of Theodore, Diodore, Ibas, and Theodoret. The purpose of 451 was to reject, by consensus, the Eutychian extreme, and confirm a consensus condemning the Nestorian extreme. So, again, those who rejected Nestorius were admitted in 451. By the time of 553, the Church had investigated Origen’s many followers, Theodore and associates, and the “moderate” Severan miaphysites. 553 was very judicious in method and Orthodox in result. It was not a corrective to Chalcedon. Rather, it decided on matters that Chalcedon never intended to investigate deeply, after an additional century allowed such deep investigations. The Holy Spirit guided the Church during the challenges from Arius, Apollinarius, Macedonius, Nestorius, Eutyches, Dioscorus, Severus, and various Origenists. Some Copts apparently honor Origen and Didymus the Blind because they were Egyptian heroes. Orthodoxy rejects them, along with Evagrius of Pontus, at the same time acknowledging that they wrote some very good things, but are not reliable overall. To repeat: Christianity believes in one person Christ with unconfused and undivided Godhood and manhood. The Nestorian distortion tends toward division. The Anti-Chalcedonians all tend toward confusion.

Jn: πάτερ ἅγιε, τήρησον αὐτοὺς ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί σου. CyrA: ἐν ὀνόματι τοῦ Πατρὸς … οἱονεὶ τὸ ἐν δόξῃ καὶ δυνάμει θεότητος…. Πατρός ἐνέργειαν. 1Clem: τῶν ἐν καθαρᾷ συνειδήσει λατρευόντων τῷ παναρέτῳ ὀνόματι αὐτοῦ…. τὸ ἀρχέγονον πάσης κτίσεως ὄνομά σου. HermSim: τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ Υἱοῦ τοῦ Θεοῦ μέγα ἐστὶ καὶ ἀχώρητον καὶ τὸν κόσμον ὅλον βαστάζει . GrP: ὅτε μίαν Θεότητά φαμεν, πάντα ὅσα ἐστὶν ὁ Θεός φαμεν, καὶ τὴν οὐσίαν καὶ τὴν ἐνέργειαν. GrP: ἑκάστη δύναμις ἢ ἐνέργεια αὐτός ἐστιν ὁ Θεός. GrP: τοῦ θείου ὀνόματος…. μόνῳ Θεῷ. MēnJan6: δοξάζηταί σου τὸ πανάγιον ὄνομα, σὺν τῷ Πατρί, καὶ τῷ Ἁγίῳ Πνεύματι. JnKr: Имя Божіе есть самъ Богъ. TikhM: Имя Его не считать за сущность Божию, не отделять от Бога, не почитать за особое Божество, не обожать букв и звуков и случайных мыслей о Боге

Post Reply