Maria wrote:Francis of Assisi was called Francis de Petra.
Alright Maria, but how is this relevant that we should focus on this, and ignore all the detailed evidence I presented over the last couple of days in this thread, regarding both Benedict and Francis? Neither you nor Barbara have specifically addressed any of the evidence I brought forth from the The Da Vinci Code/Angels and Demons, and Hollywood. You both seem to gloss right over it, as if it didn't exist, or as if I never posted it.
I still haven't gotten an answer as to what Benedict did that made him so wonderful or admirable, and pious, and upright, aside from appearing refined and listening to classical music? I always thought Benedict had a diabolical and evil look about him, but I don't allow that to unduly influence me, just as the popes who appear to have a more refined countenance don't sway me either. Benedict's own words, statements, and actions betray his diabolical character.
Hieromartyr Cosmas of Aitolia Equal-to-the-Apostles:
"THE ANTICHRISTS ARE: one, the pope, and the other one, the one who stands over our heads. You understand whom I mean without my saying so. It is sad for me to say this to you, but these Antichrists are lost as they stand now. We practice abstinence, they perdition. We fast, they indulge in gluttony. We practice virginity, they fornicate. We are just, they are unjust."
St. Cosmas was teaching this approximately 240 years ago! How many heresies and blasphemies have the popes multiplied since that time? They have manifestly become much worse. Who is so blind as to not see this?