Genuine GOC of America: A Proclamation on Ecclesiology

Discussion about the various True Orthodox Churches around the world including current events. Subforums in other langauges, primarily English on the main forum.


Moderator: Mark Templet

Post Reply
User avatar
GOCTheophan
Member
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon 11 September 2006 7:46 pm
Location: Ireland.
Contact:

Post by GOCTheophan »

Deacon Nikolai wrote:

Dear Theophan, thank you for clearing that up, that is usually what ones mean when they believe in the "light-switch theory". That may be where some of the confusion is coming from. :-)

But Father the problemn is that even if I dont believe the Light of Sacramental Grace was switched off on the Serbian Patriarchate in 1924 or 1935, I do sincerely believe it went off for her when she commited fornication with the WCC in 1965. Something that I am presuming that Ioannis and Anastasios dont- though I could be wrong.

Theophan.

Last edited by GOCTheophan on Tue 26 September 2006 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
GOCTheophan
Member
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon 11 September 2006 7:46 pm
Location: Ireland.
Contact:

Post by GOCTheophan »

Orthodox New England wrote:

If I am reading this correctly, I think it is a good proclamation: it is clear, direct and uncompromising, yet does not view NC's are Graceless.

Gregory

This is really sickening.

ROCOR no matter what the actual play according to the canons of Holy Church and not the whims of their Hierarchs will inisist with even batting an eyelid that ROAC and ROCOR under Vitaly are without Sacramental Grace while when it comes to the New Calendarist schismatics even though they fall under the anathema of three Pan-Orthodox synods aswell as the anathema of 1935 ROCOR is shocked that any would consider them as Graceless even after they have added heresy to schism by signing up to the WCC.

Theophan.

User avatar
ioannis
Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri 22 July 2005 9:38 am

Post by ioannis »

But Father the problemn is that even if I dont believe the Light of Sacramental Grace was switched off on the Serbian Patriarchate in 1924 or 1935, I do sincerely believe it went off for her when she commited fornication with the WCC in 1965. Something that I am presuming that Ioannis and Anastasios dont- though I could be wrong.

I think the lights went out with the Serbs (and basically everyone in communion with the well known condemned calendar) before 1965; that the lifting of the anathemas could even happen demonstrates that. If there are any exceptions to Gods law then that is His business - I am just to follow it and that is enough.

There seems to be way to much talk about Grace in the new-calendar churches and not enough concern with what we are doing with the Grace we have. If one found a huge pearl after completing a search of hundreds and thousands of empty oysters, I doubt one would talk much and be concerned about the empty ones. This is not directed at you Theophan, or anyone, just my general observation, which is more borne out of what I see on the internet (including myself), and not at all what I see at our actual churches.

User avatar
Orthodox New England
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri 10 December 2004 10:39 am
Location: Rhode Island

Post by Orthodox New England »

This is really sickening.

ROCOR no matter what the actual play according to the canons of Holy Church and not the whims of their Hierarchs will inisist with even batting an eyelid that ROAC and ROCOR under Vitaly are without Sacramental Grace while when it comes to the New Calendarist schismatics even though they fall under the anathema of three Pan-Orthodox synods aswell as the anathema of 1935 ROCOR is shocked that any would consider them as Graceless even after they have added heresy to schism by signing up to the WCC.

Dear Theophan --

During the 50's and 60's, the ROCOR was in communion with parishes that used the New Calendar. So, I suppose the ROCOR was heretical since it was in communion with churches that used a heretical calendar.

I am not defending the New Calendar - far from it. But lets be honest about historical circumstances.

And ROCOR never engaged in talks with the heterodox? That makes one a schismatic?

Gregory

User avatar
ioannis
Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri 22 July 2005 9:38 am

Post by ioannis »

Gregory,

If I may say a word. I don't think anyone has ever said the new calendar was "heretical", it is ecumenism (really syncretism) that is heretical. The new calendar by itself is schismatic.

In addition, from memory I believe what you are talking about is when the ROCOR received a large group of Romanians who were on the new calendar, and they were tolerated "as is" in order to get them into the church - with the expectation that they would be converted to the Church calendar.

Also, talking to heterodox is not heretical, nobody has every said that. It is when you sign your name to documents like Balamand, and generally confess that heretics are part of the Church that makes one non-Orthodox (it is after all, simply put, not the Orthodox faith).

1937 Miraculous Cross
Member
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat 25 December 2004 2:47 am
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Post by 1937 Miraculous Cross »

Ioannis said:

There seems to be way to much talk about Grace in the new-calendar churches and not enough concern with what we are doing with the Grace we have. If one found a huge pearl after completing a search of hundreds and thousands of empty oysters, I doubt one would talk much and be concerned about the empty ones. This is not directed at you Theophan, or anyone, just my general observation, which is more borne out of what I see on the internet (including myself), and not at all what I see at our actual churches.

I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately, it seems that the sole reason
Orthodox discussion groups exist is to continually speculate and debate issues. I always admired the elderly people who faithfully come to church and know nothing about internet discussion groups. We should just live the Orthodox life and maintain silence. there is not one thing in any of these discussions that will change the bishops of the various synods, and they ultimately are the bottom line.

In Christ,
Nectarios

User avatar
Jean-Serge
Protoposter
Posts: 1451
Joined: Fri 1 April 2005 11:04 am
Location: Paris (France)
Contact:

Post by Jean-Serge »

1937 Miraculous Cross wrote:

Ioannis said:

There seems to be way to much talk about Grace in the new-calendar churches and not enough concern with what we are doing with the Grace we have. If one found a huge pearl after completing a search of hundreds and thousands of empty oysters, I doubt one would talk much and be concerned about the empty ones. This is not directed at you Theophan, or anyone, just my general observation, which is more borne out of what I see on the internet (including myself), and not at all what I see at our actual churches.

I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately, it seems that the sole reason
Orthodox discussion groups exist is to continually speculate and debate issues. I always admired the elderly people who faithfully come to church and know nothing about internet discussion groups. We should just live the Orthodox life and maintain silence. there is not one thing in any of these discussions that will change the bishops of the various synods, and they ultimately are the bottom line.

In Christ,
Nectarios

THIS IS ENTIRELY TRUE... Why taking care about the Grace in heretical churches (when it left, which percentage is left and so on) if we do not commune there... It is a non-sense... And is is not spiritually edifying. Let the dead bury the dead...

Priidite, poklonimsja i pripadem ko Hristu.

Post Reply