Regular Session of the Synod of Bishops of the ROCOR(L)

Discussion about the various True Orthodox Churches around the world including current events. Subforums in other langauges, primarily English on the main forum.


Moderator: Mark Templet

Post Reply
User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Regular Session of the Synod of Bishops of the ROCOR(L)

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

NEW YORK: February 19, 2004

Press Release on the Regular Session of the Synod of Bishops
of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia

On February 17 and 18, 2004, at the Synodal House in New York City, a regular session of the Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia was held. Under the Presidency of the First Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, Metropolitan Laurus, the members of the Synod include Archbishop Mark of Berlin and Germany, Archbishop Kyrill of San Francisco and Western America, Bishop Ambroise of Vevey, Bishop Gabriel of Manhattan and Bishop Michael of Boston.A series of questions was discussed on church life and the life of the dioceses. The Synod heard the report of Archbishop Mark on the life of our monasteries in the Holy Land, and also reports of legal and financial matters of our Church. The Committee appointed by the Council of 2000 for reviewing the ТRegulations of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of RussiaУ submitted its comments on the need to amend several areas of the Regulations.

The Synod of Bishops welcomed the members of the Committee on the Unity of the Russian Church, heard the Committee’s plan, and gave its members directions for its further work.

The forthcoming visit to Russia of the First Hierarch of the Rocor, Metropolitan Laurus, was discussed.

After the meeting of the Synod of Bishops with President V.V. Putin of the Russian Federation held in September 2003, and the trip to Russia of the delegation of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia in November, the Synod was faced with the task of preparing the visit to Russia of the First Hierarch. Over recent months, besides the President and leadership of the Moscow Patriarchate, a wide scope of people of Russian Orthodox society has expressed its hope that Metropolitan Laurus visit Russia soon, and that normal ecclesiastical relations between the two parts of the Russian Orthodox Church be established.

During the sessions in New York, details of this visit were proposed. The Synod of Bishops, headed by our First Hierarch, accepted the invitation for the second half of May, and considered whom to include in the delegation which is to escort Metropolitan Laurus.

The goal of the trip by the First Hierarch and his delegation will be to become personally acquainted with the present leadership of the Moscow Patriarchate and with church life in Russia, and also to prepare the two parts of the Russian Church for the pre-conciliar period, which in principle should conclude with an All-Russian Church Council for the healing of wounds inflicted upon the Church by the atheist state in the 20th century.

bogoliubtsy
Sr Member
Posts: 666
Joined: Wed 16 April 2003 4:53 pm
Location: Russia

Post by bogoliubtsy »

I thought it was only the members of ROCiE who refer to ROCOR as "ROCOR (L)".

User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5126
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Clarification is good.

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

Nope. But I figure we should be completely clear, since we have members of ROCiE here that call themselves ROCOR(V).

Justin Kissel

Post by Justin Kissel »

Has anyone heard which groups are going to be invited to participate in the mentioned "pre-conciliar" discussions? Obviously the ROCA and MP, but what about the ROCiE, ROAC, and other groups that are "Russian" to a lesser or greater extent? and what about those groups who are descended from the Russian Church, and will be effected by a ROCA-MP union (e.g., the OCA)? The reason I ask is, I do not believe that ROAC or ROCiE (or whoever) could be left out simply because they are viewed as schismatics, since (until a few years ago at least) the MP viewed ROCOR itself as schismatic. Can you call a council to heal a schism and then say you won't invite certain people because you deem them to be schismatic? :) Of course, I realise that the different divisions have different causes, but it would be nice to at least hear that representatives/theologians for Churches other than the MP and ROCA were participating, since the stated goal has been, from the beginning, one unified Russian Church, not simply a union of two jurisdictions.

Post Reply