Do I sense a hint of sarcasm?
How much to concede to human weakness is a very delicate pastoral question, one which is rightly left to the bishop to determine. On the one hand, the people should struggle to follow the Church's rules, which are only there to save us; on the other hand, the bishop has to discern where the bar is set too high and the people will be unable to attain it, just as God saw that we were unable to pay our debt of sin and condescended to pay it for us.
Relaxation of the rules has a long history in Orthodoxy; if you're Greek, you should be aware that the Typicon you now use was considerably modified by Violakis in the late 19th century, in order to accommodate the pastoral needs of the people, e.g. having the Matins Gospel postponed until after the Canon to give people time to turn up and reverence the Gospel.
It is true that an ongoing capitulation to the spirit of the world is characteristic of World Orthodoxy, and perhaps you see the same thing occurring at St Markella's. But the laxity of practice in World Orthodoxy is a symptom of their lack of faith. The reason we don't recognize them as truly Orthodox is because their bishops preach heresy, or are silent when others do. We haven't broken communion with them simply over the fact that they have pews or organs or shortened services.
I think one should give Metropolitan Paul the benefit of the doubt and not be smug about how much more correct one's own practice is.