"And so the English constitutional monarchy is not monarchical in its origins at all, but actually arises from the first successful European revolution against the monarchy..."
And yet, how curious that the British Royal family is the last monarchy still standing. Surely, this did not just happen by accident or chance? Long ago, the British Royal family made a deal with the devil—by joining in league with the Jews. The evil fruit of this union became manifest with the Balfour Declaration, which led to the establishment of the Antichrist Zionist kingdom in Palestine. The Jews wielded their influence over America, bringing her into the war, bailing out the British, in exchange for their long-sought-after homeland. Make no mistake, the re-establishment of a Jewish kingdom in Palestine is not purely a political aim, as some would believe, but in fact is religious (more properly: irreligious) in motivation.
The Russian tsars would not betray the Faith like the Royal House of Great Britain in fact did, and so the Tsar-Martyr Nicholas II was abandoned by his earthly kin, and was taken out of the way. "Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it."
The Royal House of Great Britain has long been thoroughly and completely corrupted, is wholly given over in league with the Jews and Papists, and is at the forefront of establishing the final kingdom of Antichrist on earth. All the key players are members of secret societies.
The notion put forth to the public that the British monarchy is completely powerless, and impotent, is a deliberate facade. The British monarchy controls everything behind the scenes. The members of Parliament and the Prime Minister are mere puppets, they do not tell the Queen what to do, it's the other way around. Since the British monarchy is a prime instigator behind the worldwide revolution, and toppling of monarchies, to usher in anarchy, and the final reign of Antichrist, they can't very well appear to be autocratic in their rule, now can they? After all, what's good for the goose (is good for the gander). The masses that foment revolution around the world would eventually direct their brunt right back at the autocratic regime in Britain. So it is in her best interest to appear impotent, while operating in the shadows, to avoid bringing upon themselves the same fate that they are instigating for others.
We would do well to recognize that subversive power does not always dare to wield itself openly, but lurks behind the scenes, to deflect attention. Bill Gates is not the richest person in the world, not even close. That is laughable. The actual richest people in the world do not even get put on lists, for if the public knew how much money these banking houses really controlled, they would be shocked, angry, and revolt, calling for their heads.
Obama does not hold any real power, it is just an illusion. He is a puppet, and does what his masters ask of him. If he tried to resist or rebel against their wishes in any way, he knows he would be taken out very quickly, and easily replaced.
Everything the media spews forth is lies, designed to mislead and deceive. All the Democrats and Republicans are on the same team, and the seeming differences (what little there are) and squabbling are merely a facade and contrived. They are all actors. If anyone is naive enough to believe that they have any real convictions, they are totally deluded.
As for Berezovsky and his notions of returning a monarchy in Russia?
Berezovsky Proposes Prince Harry [Potter] Be Made Russian Monarch
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/arti ... 56796.html
London exile Boris Berezovsky announced Sunday that under his new Resurrection Movement political party, he would instate a constitutional monarchy in Russia and named Britain's Prince Harry as a candidate for king.
"He has more Russian blood than the last Russian Emperor Nicholas II."