In one [ outrageous ] interview, false-sister Teresa did mention the Savior. However, here, she invents rather a conversation which trivializes Him. Though - probably merely for the sake of creating a laugh for the magazine's readers - she admits His authority to preside at the Last Judgment, the wayward Benedictine 'nun' clearly regards him as her buddy, who can be joked around with like a garden sprite.
This interview was conducted by a dreadful organization called "United Church" for its magazine this past October.
Neither the interviewer nor the purported nun bother to capitalize the pronoun He when referring to the Savior. Then, too, for all her vaunted English skills, the Catalan separatist advocate fails to have Jesus speak grammatically. He should have said : "No, Teresa, it wasn't I".
In fact with such radical stands, one might rather safely assume that the Savior did NOT call her to become a nun to stridently attack her Church -- calling men's ordination as clergy as 'sinful', as she does in the extract below. Surely it was a demon which gave her the idea to enter a convent and St Benet in particular, which looks quite liberal from a glance at its website.
Hence, what sister Teresa speculated was in fact right : the Savior would tell her "No, Teresa, it wasn't I : it was the Devil who lured you into putting on a nun's habit in order to sabotage religious orders in general and to stir up major trouble on the European political and religious scene."
Note that the only manner in which this imposter nun employs the word sin or sinful pertains to the Catholic Church hierarchy, a convenient punching bag for Freemasons, Protestants, and so many others.
No hint has emerged of her discussing how she worries about saving her soul. Or where her soul will sent after that Judgment chat with her imagined pal, Jesus.
Q How do you reconcile being a feminist with your active role in the Catholic Church, an undeniably patriarchal institution?
A ....If you were to ask me, “Are you sure it was God calling you?” I would say, “Yes, I am existentially sure.” But my intellect tells me I could be deceiving myself.... Sometimes I imagine that when I go to the final judgment and I’m face to face with Jesus, he might say, “No, Teresa. It wasn’t me.” But I will tell him, “Okay. Fair enough. You know better, but I thought it was you. And that was enough for me to give my life to this.” I think he would like this answer.
Q I think he would too. But what about this question of patriarchy?
A I do call my church structurally misogynist. It’s not just a couple of priests here and there or a particular bunch of cardinals. The whole structure needs to be undone. Fully. Because it’s based on clericalism, and clericalism is based on ordination, and only males can be ordained and access the places where decisions are made. I find this completely sinful.
http://www.ucobserver.org/interviews/20 ... _forcades/