How could a calendar be such a big deal?

This is a safe harbor for inquirers and catechumen to ask questions and share their journey into Holy Orthodoxy. Please be kind to our newcomers and warmly welcome them. All Forum Rules apply. No polemics. No heated discussions. No name-calling.
Post Reply
User avatar
Isaakos
Member
Posts: 266
Joined: Sat 4 January 2014 8:27 pm
Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin- Discerning the GOC’s.

How could a calendar be such a big deal?

Post by Isaakos »

"WHY is a calendar such a big deal you bigoted fanatics? Have you no scope for economia? Are you greater and more strict than our fathers?"

This is a common objection usually raised by New Calendarists who haven't much researched what anathema IS...

Here is why, in simple language, it is such a big deal and in fact a betrayal of the faith:

The Church has anathematized the Papal Gregorian calendar. Both the Paschalion and the Menologion.

Now, that which is anathematized is cursed. That means to place ourselves willfully under anathema is to invite communion with Satan, rejection of Christ, and to fall outside the Church.

Now, given how serious the anathema is, there is absolutely zero legitimate use for "economia" in regard to that which is anathematized. That which is anathematized is under the dominion of Satan, and there can be no fellowship or communion between Christ and Satan.

But the Calendar reform was initiated precisely for this reason: as a way to prepare us for being ready and able and willing to "tolerate" the setting aside of the anathema. It was instigated precisely to foster the notion that the Orthodox and heterodox together constitute one Church of Christ. In other words, if the Church was a fortified city, and the liturgical calendar was the outer wall, the barrier that was the first line of defense, that which clearly, and in the minds of the faithful, distinguished them from the world and from the heretics in it, then it's overthrow must be considered a betrayal of the faith.

We would say, "But wait, it was only a calendar! Nobody denied the dogmas of the faith!" This is missing the point.

If a person sneaks out at night to the outer wall of the city and gently unlocks the gate, is this such a terrible thing? I mean, it's such a small lock, the key is so tiny, it's such a simple action: just lift the latch and slide it over and sneak back to bed. It's not so significant is it?

But in the morning, what do we awake to? The enemy of our souls is crossing the square and attempting to march on the outposts that guard the citadel of the King!

So, no, it is not a small thing. The man who sneaks out at night and lifts the latch to the city gates is no less guilty of treason than the one who steals the guards sword and slaughtered the princes of the city.

Both have placed themselves under anathema, both have fallen into heresy, and both have ceased to be members of Christ and his Church.

And look at what we see: the New Calendarists are all at the forefront of ecumenism, they all want to set aside the anathemas of Chalcedon for unity with the Monophysites. The Old Calendar ecumenists of Russia and Jerusalem lag slightly behind, but are nevertheless perishing because of their communion with heresy. Now the Patriarch of Moscow signs joint declarations with the Pope.

And you are not helping, Conservative New Calendarists! Foolishly you hope to battle in the square but insist that the outer gate be left open! You insist on retaining the anathema of the New Calendar for yourself and yet claim to fight ecumenism! No, you are, perhaps unwittingly, serving its agenda and will never see victory! You have not yet in nearly 100 years WON a single battle!

There is only one solution: Denounce the anathematized, confess the faith, and commune solely with those who refuse any communion with innovation or ecumenism.

Shut the gates, heal the sick, bury the dead, regroup, and pray.

Blessed is the man who has volunteered to hold and keep until the end of his life our holy Orthodox faith, the faith of the one Church of Christ and our mother, the Catholic and Apostolic Church.

Archbishop Matthew Karpathakis

User avatar
Cyprian
Sr Member
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat 12 November 2005 6:40 am
Faith: Orthodox Christianity
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: near Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: How could a calendar be such a big deal?

Post by Cyprian »

With the schism of Rome, the Roman pontiffs sought to place themselves above the conciliar nature of the Church. They regarded themselves as possessing supreme authority over all other bishops of the Church, including Ecumenical Councils, viewing themselves as being imbued with the power to dictate faith and practices to all of Christendom.

The unlawful imposition of the New Calendar can be understood as an imitation of the Papal schism.

The EP, and the ecclesiastical authorities of the State Church of Greece, as well as Romania, sought to unilaterally impose a calendar reform without obtaining the universal consent of the entire Church, and this calendar had also been previously rejected by multiple Church councils, as well as the phronema of the Church.

Even though it was a small portion of bishops who cast aside the Church's dogmatic principle of conciliarity, and not one lone bishop, as is the case with the Roman Pope, nevertheless, the essential violation of Church dogma in both cases is a rejection of the conciliar nature of the Church.

In the case of both, whether the Papal schism or the New Calendar schism, a minority sought to impose its will against the whole of the Church.

New-Calendarists are crypto-Papists, whether they realize it or not. New-Calendarists have rejected the conciliar nature of the Church, preferring to obey and follow lawless authorities who tried to unilaterally impose their will against the rest of the Church. This is unacceptable and demonic.

As a result, New-Calendarists no longer celebrate the Holy Nativity of Christ with the Church of the saints, but rather with the apostate Roman pontiff. More evidence that they are crypto-Papists, and that the imposition of the New Calendar was about luring Orthodox Christians into the heresy of Papism, which is the forerunner of Antichrist.

That is why we see Bartholomew invite the pope of Rome to the Phanar, having his deacon commemorate him as the Orthodox bishop of Rome, and Bartholomew and other New-Calendarists playing the role of pope-kissers, etc.

The holy fathers (St. Pope Gregory the Great, St. Cosmas Equal to the Apostles, etc.) tell us that Papism is the forerunner of Antichrist. The pope styles himself as the infallible "Supreme Vicar of Christ on earth," and presumes to be invested with the authority to rule over all Christendom in the place of Christ. He does this by placing himself above all the councils of the Church and above all other bishops. Who is unable to recognize these papal pretensions as a precursor to Antichrist, one man, dictating to everyone who must be worshiped as God?

Roman Catholics are already worshiping Antichrist in spirit, via their submission to the unlawful Antichrist office of the pope. New-Calendarists are already treading the path of Papism, when they join themselves to an ecclesiastical schism that imitated the schism of the pope when it cast aside the dogmatic principle of conciliarity.

Papists are on the road that ultimately leads to the worship of Antichrist, and New-Calendarists are on the road to becoming Papists. They are both on the same road, and we know where it ends—Antichrist.

Post Reply