Isaakos,
Wikipedia and the "Orthodox" wiki are not completely reliable sources of information. They can be a useful resource, but I have encountered number of errors on these sites. Anyone can go in and edit them. As I said, it's a resource, just like the NY Times can be a resource, but we don't unquestioningly trust everything that is printed in the NY Times, right? Neither should we with regards to "Orthodox" Wiki.
I am aware of the site you linked to, partisans of Met. Kyrikos, and their calling it "Pan-Orthodox," but once again, on what authority do they consider the Council "Pan-Orthodox"? Just because someone puts some information in a wiki or on a website does not mean it is true.
That Moscow council was 350 years ago. If it was truly Pan-Orthodox, then there ought to be plenty of testimony from reliable Orthodox sources in the intervening centuries testifying as much. So, perhaps it might be a good idea to ask the followers of Met. Kyrikos on whose authority they call the council of 1666-67 "Pan-Orthodox". I have asked before, years ago, but have never received a satisfactory answer.
And besides Christ words himself: no man has seen the father at any time.
That is true, no man has seen the Father. He is invisible. It is no different for the Son. No man has seen the Son either. He is also invisible. The Son is the icon of the invisible God. (Col. 1:15)