The Roman Pseudo-Church under Bergoglio alias Francis is to-day an apostate organisation from the Christian Faith.
Modernism in today's RCC & the SSPX
-
- Member
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue 25 April 2006 8:34 am
-
- Member
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue 25 April 2006 8:34 am
Re: Modernism in today's RCC & the SSPX
When we speak about Modernism today's Roman Church we must also speak about the roll of all these organisations in this pseudo-church who are external conservative but in no way sedisvacantists. They serve to deceive the so called right wing of this apostate organisation, in other words the "Anglicanisation" with different wings right and left and are coworkers of Bergoglio alias Francis. A very dangerous organisation is the so called "Brotherhood of Pius X" founded by Marcel Levèbvre. Also the "Bishop" and Rosicrucian Richard Williamson (born 1940), formerly an Anglican, is an important person in this performance.
http://1amendmentcont.blogspot.ch/2014/ ... amson.html
- Maria
- Archon
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
- Faith: True Orthodox Christian
- Jurisdiction: GOC
- Location: USA
Re: Modernism in today's RCC & the SSPX
Here is an interesting development:
A bishop within the SSPX, Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta, speaks out against union with Francis.
http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/gala ... x-rome.htm
Here is a summary (excerpt only): See the above link for the entire article written by Christian Lassale
I—The Atmosphere in Rome
We are witnessing an upsurge of modernism in Rome with Pope Francis. This can have a positive effect in that more and more cardinals and bishops are strongly and publicly reacting against this waywardness.II—The State of Our Relations with Rome
Concerning our relations with Rome, there exist two distinct paths since the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith sent Bishop Fellay two new documents in July 2015, one doctrinal, and the other canonical.
The doctrinal document is less demanding than the one of 2012, but the required conditions are still unacceptable. They will always be undoubtedly so, given their purpose is to make us accept Vatican II. Even if it were acceptable, it would be necessary to go through the second stage, the canonical one.
The canonical document is also unacceptable, as it puts us in practical dependence upon authorities who want the Church’s harm. They will never be able to accept our necessary conditions for our security. Even if, by some remote chance, they were to accept them, there would remain the third stage: impossible to circumvent, that of the SSPX general chapter.
Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.
- Maria
- Archon
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
- Faith: True Orthodox Christian
- Jurisdiction: GOC
- Location: USA
Re: Modernism in today's RCC & the SSPX
The same Novus Ordo Watch website also revealed Bishop Williamson's vague answers when he was asked if someone could attend a Novus Ordo Mass. This very fact was one reason why I never joined the SSPX when Bishop Williamson was in charge of the USA. His statements back in the early to mid 1990s were too vague. My friends who were Taditional Catholics were not pleased with him, nor did they like the way he was running the SSPX seminary in the USA.
In his answer, Bp. Williamson argues the following and then some:
Code: Select all
The New Mass is a key part of the New Religion and the worldwide apostasy Stay away from the New Mass! You can go to the New Mass under certain circumstances The New Mass is wrong as a whole If it nourishes your Faith, you can go (this “seems” to be the “absolute rule of rules”) You cannot cause scandal by going to the New Mass Archbishop Lefebvre said the New Mass is a danger to the Faith There are Eucharistic miracles in the New Mass The New Religion, of which the New Mass is a key part, is dangerous and strangles grace The New Mass can build your Faith The New Mass does harm in itself Decide for yourself Ask a priest you trust and heed his advice — maybe The rite of the New Mass was designed to get you away from the Catholic Faith If you can trust your own judgment, use your own judgment All of this is just his opinion and “almost heresy” Maybe none of this should be said in public Etc., ad nauseam[/quote]
Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.
-
- Member
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue 25 April 2006 8:34 am
Re: Modernism in today's RCC & the SSPX
Williamson is in no way trustworthy. He is an agent of Bergoglia alias Francis. Your Traditional Catholics friends have no opinion about the real conditions in the apostate Roman synagogue. Galaretta also is dangerous agent of the same Bergoglio.
- Maria
- Archon
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
- Faith: True Orthodox Christian
- Jurisdiction: GOC
- Location: USA
Re: Modernism in today's RCC & the SSPX
Okay, this Galarreta is the current SSPX Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta.
Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.