ROCOR-L's Lesna Convent Votes to Join the RTOC

News about traditional Orthodox monastics and how these monks and nuns are living out their vocations in monasteries and convents. All Forum Rules apply. No polemics. No heated discussions. No name-calling.

Moderator: Mark Templet

User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: Euless, TX, United States of America
Contact:

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

From what I am hearing they have voted, but will not take action until the document is signed by Met. Laurus and Pat. Alexei II. I think that is the "line in the sand" that many are waiting for before they leave the ROCOR-L.

User avatar
michigan
Jr Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue 9 August 2005 2:24 pm
Location: here

Post by michigan »

I lived there for two years, and keep regular contact with them. In fact, I called just last week. They are not going to take any action to leave ROCOR until the reunification actually takes place. (hoping for a last-minute change)In fact, the sister I spoke to specifically said that the internet rumors aren't true.

User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: Euless, TX, United States of America
Contact:

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

DOCUMENT: Letter of Lesna Monastery sisters concerning their passage under the jurisdiction of the True Orthodox Church of Russia

Dear in Christ friends and benefactors of our monastery! Christ is Risen!

We wish to inform you that as of the feast of Mid-Pentecost, 19.04/02.05.2007, our monastery will be under the jurisdiction of the True Orthodox Church of Russia. Beginning on Tuesday evening with the Vespers of the feast, we will His Grace, the Most Reverend Archbishop Tikhon, Archbishop of Omsk and Siberia, as our ruling hierarch. Many of you know our unwillingness to accept the pending union of the Moscow Patriarchate and the Church Abroad and of our reluctance to follow that path. Our decision was not made lightly. We gave it much thought, sought the advice of many, prayed hard and wept throughout this troubled time.

Sincerely and from the bottom of our hearts we thank our many, many friends and well wishers, from many different jurisdictions, holding the most varied opinions and headed in various directions, for the assistance that they have offered and for the support that they have voiced as we struggled to come to the right decision in choosing a new path for our monastery.We understand that not everyone will agree with us, but we ask you to believe that we have acted according to our conscience, and that we felt we could not decide otherwise without betraying our past, our heavenly protectors, our instructors and the sisters who have gone before us.We do not press anyone to follow us, we do not condemn anyone, nor consider them to be "without grace" or "outside the Church". Our times are very complicated and treacherous and it is truly difficult to come to a decision and to discern the best way without being swayed by one's passions.We do not feel that we have the right to condemn anyone that has come to different conclusions in these matters.The great majority of our sisters support our decision. We will not force anyone to comply with it.And we will assist those sisters that decide otherwise to find homes with other monastic communities.

Some of you have expressed doubts about various jurisdictions, pointing out the weaknesses, mistakes or faults of certain hierarchs.We wish to clarify that we did not choose hierarchs that we liked personally, but the Church body and path that we felt best preserved and perpetuated the teachings and traditions of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad.

Along with the rumours of our refusal to accept union with the Moscow Patriarchate, there has been much talk over the past few months of an imminent move by our monastery to Russia.It is true that since the appearance in Russia of parishes of the Church Abroad, and once sisters from the former Soviet bloc countries began entering our community, we had hoped to found a dependent monastic community there and undertook several steps in that direction.This is something our abbesses had prayed and hoped for, consciously preserving our monastery as a largely Russian-speaking community, with services in Church Slavonic and the traditions of pre-revolutionary Russian monasticism. We do hope eventually to start at least a small skete in Russia. On the other hand, we are well aware of all of the risks and dangers involved in doing business and even just plain living in contemporary Russia, especially for inexperienced foreigners, and we have no intention of dropping everything in Provemont and forcibly transporting our sisters to some unknown destination.We intend to continue our monastic life within the walls of our present monastery according to our strength and financial possibilities.

Many of you know of the complications with the legal status and ownership of our property.The church, houses and land in Provemont officially belong to the so-called "Association of Friends" of the monastery, comprised of clergy and laity from many different jurisdictions; in short, of everyone except the sisters of the monastery. It is entirely possible that our adherence to the True Orthodox Church of Russia will lead to claims on our property, to legal action, to inter-jurisdictional squabbling and financial difficulties.Many lawyers and notaries have assured us on numerous occasions that, as the monastery has been paying the property tax on this real estate for many years in it's own name and from it's own funds, and has maintained the estate at it's own expense, with virtually no help from the hierarchy of the Church Abroad, it de facto belongs to us and that it is impossible to evict us.Nevertheless, our uncertain situation worries the sisters, and we ask for your prayers and support.

Ever since its foundation in a largely non-Orthodox area on the borders of the Russian Empire, our monastery has been open to all that seek God and the Truth, and such, God willing, it shall always remain.All pilgrims to our miracle-working Icon of the Mother of God of Lesna or wishing to venerate our many other spiritual treasures will always be welcome, and we will accommodate them as best we can according to our means and our monastic rules.In questions regarding participation in our liturgical life and in the Sacraments we will be guided by the instructions of our hierarchs.

Our life will undoubtedly change to some degree in these new circumstances.We do not know if we will be able to continue celebrating the Divine Liturgy daily, as for now only Hieromonk Evfimy (Trofimov) is remaining with us.We hope to continue celebrating the entire cycle of services, but we will have to take into account a smaller community and the necessity of providing for ourselves.Financially the monastery is managing, but donations have always been a great help, and we have no idea as to what sort of assistance we can rely on in the future. When the nuns in San Francisco separated themselves from the Church Abroad they were accused of taking funds that were intended for a monastery specifically of the Church Abroad.We dare to hope that you have made your donations with the intent of supporting our monastic life regardless of what jurisdiction we were under.

We humbly ask your prayers for us as we embark on this new path.Metropolitan Philaret, who considered Lesna his summer home, left us the words "…that which ye have already hold fast…" (Rev. 2:25) as his last testament, and such is our intention.The recently reposed Metropolitan Vitaly, who twice convened Church Councils at our monastery, ended his days in exile and poverty, and we do not fear a similar fate.Our sense of the unceasing protection of the Most Holy Mother of God, St. John of Kronstadt's letter preserved here, promising not to abandon our monastery, the appearance of St. John of Shanghai to the guardian of his chapel in San Francisco, reminding him that Lesna needed help, and the recent news that the remains of our foundress, Abbess Catherine, were discovered incorrupt, fill us with hope and strengthen our faith in the prayers and intercession on our behalf in heaven. And we ask your prayers for us sinners.

With profound gratitude and always with love in Christ,
Abbess Macrina and sisters

19.04/02.05.2007
Mid Pentecost

User avatar
Helen
Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed 20 September 2006 6:41 am

Post by Helen »

Very sober letter - nice to see

User avatar
GOCTheophan
Member
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon 11 September 2006 7:46 pm
Location: Ireland.
Contact:

Post by GOCTheophan »

helen wrote:

Very sober letter - nice to see

Is it?

Sadly "RTOC" has the same canonical irregularities in it's origin that the Milian synod has who no one else recognises, with the acceptation that Archbishop Auxentius actually did grant them independence with Metropolitian Vitaly denied doing such for "RTOC" despite their claims. Their founder archbishop Lazar had a repuation in the Catacombs of being a KGB agent and was not trusted at all. Than there is the question of their "Kyprianism"...So sadly "RTOC" was not a sober chioce and their joining them is not nice to see. ROCOR is in a mess true, but she remains the Church which RTOC for all its endeavours is not ( or at least I dont see how she could be). By ROCOR I mean of course "ROCiE" or "ROCOR-Vitaly" or whatever other name you would like to use.

Theophan.

User avatar
Jean-Serge
Protoposter
Posts: 1383
Joined: Fri 1 April 2005 11:04 am
Location: Paris (France)
Contact:

Post by Jean-Serge »

Well, ROAC was, according to me the best solution. But I read something really wrrying in this letter : ther will probably be a law suit for the control of the building. It becomes a Orthodox Tradition in France (Nices, Cannes, Provémont, Biarritz and so on).

Priidite, poklonimsja i pripadem ko Hristu.

User avatar
Helen
Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed 20 September 2006 6:41 am

Post by Helen »

Dear Theophan,

I know very little about all the ins and outs of who's canonical and who isn't. I was refering to the spirit of her letter which it seemed to me was written in a spirit of non-judmentalism and conscientiousness. They seem to have acted according to their conscience but in doing so have not name-called or judged anyone in the process. That is nice to see

Post Reply