Vladimir Soloviev

Chapter discussions and book or film reviews of Orthodox Christian and secular books that you have read and found helpful. All Forum Rules apply.
Post Reply
Reader Nilus
Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue 26 November 2002 9:10 pm
Contact:

Vladimir Soloviev

Post by Reader Nilus »

Does anyone know of any Church comment or feelings of the Church on Vladimir Soloviev? On another board someone posted this link, Russia and the Universal Church by Vladimir Soloviev (originally published in 1889) http://praiseofglory.com/solovievrock.htm and asked me how Soloviev is viewed in Orthodox Circles. I know he flirted with Roman Catholicism and is said to even take communion from RC priests which would put him out of communion with us if he did that.
Nilus

bogoliubtsy
Sr Member
Posts: 666
Joined: Wed 16 April 2003 4:53 pm
Location: Russia

Post by bogoliubtsy »

My understanding is that Soloviev's writings were kind of a precursor to what would come with Bulgakov, Schmemann, and the rest of the Parisian school. Soloviev's writings dabble in Sophianism and are at times far removed from a traditional Orthodox spirit...this I gather from the little bit I have read about him, as I have not actually read him. I don't believe ROCOR thinks too highly of him.

User avatar
Methodius
Member
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 25 February 2003 5:50 pm

Post by Methodius »

I know the Russian Uniates consider him their Father of their flaw-sophy. He was a philosopher rather than a theologian and this caused him to sometimes come up with flawed thought when dealing with the Church.

Nevski
Jr Member
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu 6 February 2003 12:39 am

Re: Vladimir Soloviev

Post by Nevski »

Hello, Nilus (O you of The Dalles who are known by another name elswhere!)

Based on what little I've read, Soloviev was indeed a sophiologist, a sort of gnostic philosophy that has been condemned by the church. He was also a Romaphile (which is why many Catholics like him) and is also said that he received communion from a Roman priest.

I'm not sure that, as a poster mentioned above, that he greatly influenced the Parisian school, and while sophiological tendencies are certainly noted in Bulgakov, I've never heard that Schmemann ever imbibed any of this.

Soloviev was an intereting and engaging writer, and had some good things to say. But, theologically, he was quite off the mark.

Nevski

Post Reply